[QUOTE=NORTHERNSOUL;1245264][QUOTE=monkey hanger;1245201]
Quote:
Originally Posted by NORTHERNSOUL
But with respect that isnt really the point is it ?
When you have the 3 generations living in the 3 bedroom terraced house and the teenager goes out into the big wild world and brings the virus back into the house its pretty obvious and doesnt take a genius to work out that it wont be long before the other 12 of them catch it and are soon out in the community happily spreading it about probrably in most cases without even knowing it.
Ive said right from the start it was absolute madness to send people with positive tests back into their own households to isolate.
At the start of the crisis the government were offered both the Premier Inn and Travelodge estates so why the hell they didnt take them up on it and then a positive test would have meant 2 weeks of Borisis hospitality watching p o r n and sky sports for in relative luxury locked in a lodge room but in the knowledge they wouldnt be infecting anybody.
|
Councils spent a lot of money on hotels for homeless people, they were not free,and the money soon ran out.
They were not used for COVID positive people, as it could lead to more break-outs unless they would have been confined to a room by an armed guard. Plus it would be very dangerous for the staff and their families and here would only have a fraction of the numbers needed.