Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up? - Page 40

Less · 13-03-2013, 17:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

He's got a cheek asking for apologies, when he is one himself

I find his objections to savile to be unfortunately Warranted, however I also find an illegal drug user wether he's ex or still using a to be a touch hypocritical from what i understand these countries that grow and supply drugs treat young girls in a similar fashion to what savile did.

jaysay · 13-03-2013, 18:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

I find his objections to savile to be unfortunately Warranted, however I also find an illegal drug user wether he's ex or still using a to be a touch hypocritical from what i understand these countries that grow and supply drugs treat young girls in a similar fashion to what savile did.

Something must have glazed his eyes Less

kestrelx · 14-03-2013, 11:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Welcome back, where have you been?
24 hours late with the news, shall we put that down to flash backs from what you took in the sixties?
A bit of a double Standard isn't it?
Although not quite as bad you are also guilty of breaking the law.

Mmm well Less it wasn't the 60's I was too young then! Also it may have been a day late but I have other things to do and wasn 't able to get on line on the day the news article was featured!

However the issue has no similarity to taking drugs - abusing someone sexually is harming them for your own advantage. Taking drugs is a personal activity and there is no comparison at all. There is no excuse for raping people, no exuse of Saville's evil activities.

Less · 14-03-2013, 12:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Mmm well Less it wasn't the 60's I was too young then! Also it may have been a day late but I have other things to do and wasn 't able to get on line on the day the news article was featured!

However the issue has no similarity to taking drugs - abusing someone sexually is harming them for your own advantage. Taking drugs is a personal activity and there is no comparison at all. There is no excuse for raping people, no exuse of Saville's evil activities.

No excuse for making a drugs baron wealthy enough to be above the law and do all the things savile did with impunity.

cashman · 14-03-2013, 13:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Mmm well Less it wasn't the 60's I was too young then! Also it may have been a day late but I have other things to do and wasn 't able to get on line on the day the news article was featured!

However the issue has no similarity to taking drugs - abusing someone sexually is harming them for your own advantage. Taking drugs is a personal activity and there is no comparison at all. There is no excuse for raping people, no exuse of Saville's evil activities.

Taking drugs can be more than personal,when it affects someones family,or do they not count.?

jaysay · 14-03-2013, 17:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

Taking drugs can be more than personal,when it affects someones family,or do they not count.?

Not in his crazy mixed up mind cashy

Wynonie Harris · 15-03-2013, 20:40

y

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Still I get no apologies for the slagging I got when i started this!

Are you some sort of obsessive? Yes, you started a thread about Savile being a child molester and you've been proved right about it. Congratulations! Now get over it, or are you going to continue whining about it indefinitely?

jaysay · 16-03-2013, 08:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

y

Are you some sort of obsessive? Yes, you started a thread about Savile being a child molester and you've been proved right about it. Congratulations! Now get over it, or are you going to continue whining about it indefinitely?

Stupid was as stupid is Wyn

kestrelx · 16-03-2013, 15:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Stupid was as stupid is Wyn

Your an idiot pal! Your the one who was defending Saville and claiming this was all a band wagon by money grabbers trying to cash in! When it's now being shown people complained back in the early 60's but were put off by the (bent) Police! You are the stupid one pal!

Less · 16-03-2013, 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Your an idiot pal! Your the one who was defending Saville and claiming this was all a band wagon by money grabbers trying to cash in! When it's now being shown people complained back in the early 60's but were put off by the (bent) Police! You are the stupid one pal!

No matter what Jay has said in the past, is the above a reasoned argument or just the rancid utterings of a half mad ex druggie? Shame on the guy That liked it.

annesingleton · 16-03-2013, 19:29

Has anyone gone back to the first pages of this thread, I have found it quite amusing to see the change in opinions!

cashman · 16-03-2013, 20:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by annesingleton

Has anyone gone back to the first pages of this thread, I have found it quite amusing to see the change in opinions!

When opinions change in light of evidence produced that can only be a good thing IMHO. Pity the birdy don't think so.

kestrelx · 19-03-2013, 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

When opinions change in light of evidence produced that can only be a good thing IMHO. Pity the birdy don't think so.

You and Jaysay are Dumb and getting Dumber!

MargaretR · 19-03-2013, 17:38

Latest news on the Fernbridge investigation are that there are several super injunctions in force. Which explains why mainstream newspapers are saying nowt.

As one who is following this sordid story on the web, I hope that the two names are publicly exposed, and you are in for a big surprise .

- an elderly tory ex cabinet minister and a very christian pop idol

Less · 19-03-2013, 18:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

You and Jaysay are Dumb and getting Dumber!

Down to your normal standard of insult, I almost 'liked' the post just for it's predictability.