 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Forum | Donate! | Join Today | Blogs | Arcade | Gallery | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room [1] |
| General Chat General chat - common sense in here please. Decent serious discussions to be enjoyed by everyone! |
|
Welcome to Accrington Web! You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
15-07-2008, 10:06
|
#16 |
|
The Meek and Mild Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a state of confusion
Posts: 4,943
Rep Power: 68
|
Re: Another Government Crackpot Initiative
I'm in the zero tollerance lobby on this one, drinking and driving don't mix no matter how much you've had
__________________
 I'M NOT AS GOOD AS I ONCE WAS, BUT I'M AS GOOD ONCE AS I EVER WAS |
|
|
|
15-07-2008, 10:31
|
#17 | |
|
Apprentice Geriatric
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwen, Lancashire
Posts: 3,547
Rep Power: 60
|
Re: Another Government Crackpot Initiative
Quote:
There is a tolerance on breaking the speed limits, allegedly 10% plus 2 mph, to take into account the inaccuracy of speedos. Even those signs that show what speed you are doing as you approach them show about 3 mph less than your own speedo does. So why not a small tolerance on the breathalyser?
__________________
Thanks for reading. If you have a few minutes to spare please visit my web site at http://uk.geocities.com/cdmxrn@btinternet.com |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| Other sites of interest.. | More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58.
Style Provided By: Wrestling Clique - Wrestling Forums
