Potential Labour Candidate for Hyndburn - Page 26

andrewb · 18-01-2010, 15:58

I think you should publish it now that the sender has given you permission. I'd like to know what it says that got you so excited.

garinda · 18-01-2010, 16:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

I think you should publish it now that the sender has given you permission. I'd like to know what it says that got you so excited.

As a moderator on Accrington Web, do you really think you should be using your position to encourage other members to break clear forum rules?

Rules which seem fairly transparent, and make no mention of it being fine to publish, even with consent.

12: All posts on the forum to be made in English. If you wish to communicate in a foreign language, please do so on the PM system,also PM=PRIVATE MESSAGE and all pm's are just that Private and must not be posted on the forum no matter how old they are or who they are from.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

I'm sure you'd love my right to a democratic voice on here to be silenced, but I have no intention of aquiring a ban. So that isn't going to happen.

cashman · 18-01-2010, 16:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

I think you should publish it now that the sender has given you permission. I'd like to know what it says that got you so excited.

Why don't you Andrew? you clearly thought the same. and YOU know what it said.

andrewb · 18-01-2010, 17:19

Garinda, that rule is in place to stop private conversations in PM from being spread from there, as one member may have sent a private message under the impression that it is indeed, private. As the sender has given his consent to that particular message being posted, there is no problem. As a moderator I can tell you now, you wont be banned.

Cashman, I haven't seen the PM. I've no idea if garinda sent it to others on request, but I didn't request it.

garinda · 18-01-2010, 17:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

Garinda, that rule is in place to stop private conversations in PM from being spread from there, as one member may have sent a private message under the impression that it is indeed, private. As the sender has given his consent to that particular message being posted, there is no problem. As a moderator I can tell you now, you wont be banned.

Cashman, I haven't seen the PM. I've no idea if garinda sent it to others on request, but I didn't request it.

Sent under the title 'Hi Andrew'.

Hello Andrew

Just thought i'd tell you that the party has not picked a candidate yet, but best not tell everybody on Any Web

John

Seems fairly obvious it wasn't intended for me, but a straightforward communication between Jaysay and andrewb.

blazey · 18-01-2010, 18:28

If the rules were followed by their strictest sense, it would mean that anything I discuss with someone via PM can never be discussed on the forum, which would cause all sorts of problems, wouldn't it?

cashman · 18-01-2010, 18:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

Garinda, that rule is in place to stop private conversations in PM from being spread from there, as one member may have sent a private message under the impression that it is indeed, private. As the sender has given his consent to that particular message being posted, there is no problem. As a moderator I can tell you now, you wont be banned.

Cashman, I haven't seen the PM. I've no idea if garinda sent it to others on request, but I didn't request it.

i never said you had seen it, i said you know what was in it n you do, are ya denying that?

turkishdelight · 18-01-2010, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

i never said you had seen it, i said you know what was in it n you do, are ya denying that?

Cashman Just been out for dinner with A.B. He had no idea what was in it, he was laughing about what had happened and i thought Jaysay may have named the conservative candidate, in the message, the reason why Gary was so exited. Andrew informed me that he did not know, what the message was about, because he had never received it.Turned out not to be as exiting ,as i thought,after reading it.

garinda · 18-01-2010, 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

Cashman Just been out for dinner with A.B. He had no idea what was in it, he was laughing about what had happened and i thought Jaysay may have named the conservative candidate, in the message, the reason why Gary was so exited. Andrew informed me that he did not know, what the message was about, because he had never received it.Turned out not to be as exiting ,as i thought,after reading it.

I suggest you might be wise to read the rules of this site too, not having my consent to use my real name.

8: No personal names, addresses & phone numbers to be left on the forum, unless with consent of the person concerned.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

Less · 18-01-2010, 19:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

next time I'll tell him the moons made of green cheese, it isn't really

And you can prove it isn't made of green cheese how?

We have more than our fair share of stick their head in the sand conspiracy theorists that claim the Americans never went to the moon, so unless you can prove those loony tunes wrong why should we believe anything from a tory with his head stuck up his own sand dune about what the moon is made of?

garinda · 18-01-2010, 20:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

Cashman Just been out for dinner with A.B. He had no idea what was in it, he was laughing about what had happened and i thought Jaysay may have named the conservative candidate, in the message, the reason why Gary was so exited. Andrew informed me that he did not know, what the message was about, because he had never received it.Turned out not to be as exiting ,as i thought,after reading it.

...and besides, as you once foolishly tried to recruit a close relative of mine into joining a pyramid selling scheme, promising riches beyond one's wildest dreams, your ability to judge the true facts of a situation, I don't hold very much store by.

Unless of course you're posting on Accy Web from a mansion on a private island somewhere.

Then l may have to reconsider your gullibilty, and not hold your opinion in such low esteem.

turkishdelight · 18-01-2010, 20:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

I suggest you might be wise to read the rules of this site too, not having my consent to use my real name.

8: No personal names, addresses & phone numbers to be left on the forum, unless with consent of the person concerned.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

As i have witnessed personal names used previously, i was not aware it was such an issue, however i guess i thought it was nice to use a name sometimes,polite, i thought. Read the rules previously but forgotten them now. Apologies.

andrewb · 18-01-2010, 20:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

I suggest you might be wise to read the rules of this site too, not having my consent to use my real name.

8: No personal names, addresses & phone numbers to be left on the forum, unless with consent of the person concerned.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

Get a grip. Loads of people use your name. Are you going to start picking and choosing who can or cannot use your name when replying to you despite it all being in the public eye? You can try reporting it and see what the other mods think. If you haven't already reported it, then I'd suspect you were just being petty.

turkishdelight, I reckon it would be best if you called him Garinda so he doesn't have a hissy fit.

Cashman as of today Jaysay told me the general content of the message, I thought it might have been longer. Seems not. Kind of amusing that Garinda is still under the impression that this was genuinely meant for myself. Makes me giggle whenever I read the thread. Too proud to admit he was done.