Hello and HELP finding a lost dog - Page 5

Less · 23-03-2012, 14:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM01

Less, I'm hurt. You haven't seen my post in another thread. Where's the love?

I've been a little diverted today, perhaps someone posted straight after you, thus preventing me seeing your name in lights?

My goodness, we seem to be getting on like a house on fire all of a sudden, could it be your growing to like me?
Or could it be you brushing over the fact that the dog wasn't yours to interfere with?

Whatever it is welcome to AccyWeb may you post long and sensible.

Margaret Pilkington · 23-03-2012, 14:12

Less, you keep on harping on about the dogs owner...the dog hasn't got an owner...it is a rescue dog.......probably given up, or the owner died.....it could even be a cruelty case.
Scruples(the rescue charity) have taken it on, and it is my understanding that it was with a foster family until a new home could be found for it. In the interim, the rescue charity was doing what most rescue charities do......neuter the animals..... to save new owners from having to get it done.

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 14:15

Less, it's just pure and utter lust I have for you...

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 14:16

Oh, just heard... there's a possible sighting of the dog. Fingers crossed

Margaret Pilkington · 23-03-2012, 14:16

OMG....don't tell him that!
He will have to take twice as many pills!

Margaret Pilkington · 23-03-2012, 14:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM01

Oh, just heard... there's a possible sighting of the dog. Fingers crossed

I really do hope so....and that he has taken no harm from his wanderings.
Keep us posted please PM01.

Less · 23-03-2012, 14:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

Less, you keep on harping on about the dogs owner...the dog hasn't got an owner...it is a rescue dog.......probably given up, or the owner died.....it could even be a cruelty case.
Scruples(the rescue charity) have taken it on, and it is my understanding that it was with a foster family until a new home could be found for it. In the interim, the rescue charity was doing what most rescue charities do......neuter the animals..... to save new owners from having to get it done.

Margaret the dog was lost, that doesn't mean it doesn't have an owner, they may not have access to the internet, they could be fretting their loss, it has been stated earlier the dog wasn't checked for a chip, nor did it have a chip applied at the time of it's operation.
Look back, I think you will find the dog was dealt with before the correct owner was notified or ownership was transferred to these so called rescuers.
Now, will you kindly get back to fretting less, and posting in something worthwhile?

susie123 · 23-03-2012, 14:26

I like the way the most recent post on Facebook says:
We have a possible lead on where Blue/Louis is.

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 14:27

Less, may I suggest YOU look back before you continually misrepresent what I said.

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 14:44

Just to stop the whining about this dogs balls and ownership, blah, blah... He was dumped at a dog pound where they kept him for the required time, before legally signing him over to the charity. The policy is to have all dogs 'fixed' before rehoming.

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 14:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by susie123

I like the way the most recent post on Facebook says:
We have a possible lead on where Blue/Louis is.

The foster carer must feel terrible!

susie123 · 23-03-2012, 14:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM01

Just to stop the whining about this dogs balls and ownership, blah, blah... He was dumped at a dog pound where they kept him for the required time, before legally signing him over to the charity. The policy is to have all dogs 'fixed' before rehoming.

Thank goodness for putting the record straight, now we can get our eye back on the ball (!) and look for him.

Margaret Pilkington · 23-03-2012, 14:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Margaret the dog was lost, that doesn't mean it doesn't have an owner, they may not have access to the internet, they could be fretting their loss, it has been stated earlier the dog wasn't checked for a chip, nor did it have a chip applied at the time of it's operation.
Look back, I think you will find the dog was dealt with before the correct owner was notified or ownership was transferred to these so called rescuers.
Now, will you kindly get back to fretting less, and posting in something worthwhile?

Where did you get that information Less......if you look at the very first post, it tells that the dog has recently come into rescue......and it goes on to say that it was lost after it had been neutered by the Rescue charity.
PM01 also told us that this animal didn't have an owner, but was being 'fostered' until new owners could be found.

I'm not fretting at all, but it is kind for you to be concerned about my mental welfare.

What thread would you consider to be 'worthwhile' for me to post in?

I'm not grabbed by much of what is on offer at present....many of these threads just seem to have a circular motion......and it is making me a bit seasick.
I'll go and get the Kwells.

PM01 · 23-03-2012, 15:30

“It's good sportsmanship not to pick up lost balls while they are still rolling” Mark Twain

Less · 23-03-2012, 15:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM01

Less, may I suggest YOU look back before you continually misrepresent what I said.

Take a look at posts, 11,12,13 & espescially 14 that one you admit the dog was operated on without knowing true ownership, If the dog has found it's way back home, is it me being annoying or your 'do gooding', facing court for damage of property?
Such operations can only be performed with consent of the owner, on your own admission there are doubts about your ownership and therefore the operation is premature, should have checked for a chip.