FootballTalk about anything football related here..Any teams, any topic - so long as its football!
Welcome to Accrington Web!
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
its not the 6 months that is ridiculous but the fact that they won nothing and then sacked him. He should have been given at least a FULL season to see if he could get them some silverware then sacked if none. He did well in getting them to where they got this season but 2nd doesn't bring the glory
__________________
Please note s/n is Ber not bert thanks
looks like will have to new project in garden this year!!
Spoilt little Russian twerp, came second in 3 comps, toys come out of the pram, just goes to show spending £500 million don't guarantee sucess, who ever they get hope they win nuot again next year
__________________
I CAN ONLY PLEASE ONE PERSON EACH DAY
TODAY IS NOT YOUR DAY
TOMORROW DOESN'T LOOK GOOD EITHER
Last edited by jaysay; 25-05-2008 at 11:20.
Reason: error
I`m not a big fan of Man Utd but i wanted them to win everything rather than Chelski as i think its a sad day when teams can buy the silverware, i know Blackburn bought the league once but that was only ever going to be a one off.
As for Grant i feel sorry for him as he was just made a scapegoat, for the teams ineptness on the field, long may they always be runners up.
Would murhino have done any better? I dont think he would, I dont blame grant at all, more the prima donna's like the big daft ivorian up front! who is quality on his day, but there are a good number of chelsea players who consistently under performed for grant and for his predecessor.
__________________ www.familygascare.co.uk
If time travel were possible, wouldn't somebody have been back or forward and told us by now?