 |
|
|
Accyweb Radio
|
|
|
|
| Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
|
02-08-2008, 18:40
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 502
Rep Power: 10
|
barrow 2 1 stanley
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 18:43
|
#2
|
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: back in acc.
Posts: 4,180
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
Useless scored for us.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 18:47
|
#3
|
|
God Member
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
which one?
__________________
All the opinions in my posts are just that - 'my' 'opinion' They do not necessarily contain any fact so cannot be libellous or defamatory. So don't bother suing me or this website
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 18:50
|
#4
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 401
Rep Power: 14
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
If "Useless" Craney scored, what does that make those who didn't score - especially attackers such as Mullin, Clarke, etc. The Barrow unofficial forum says that if that was our first team (and I don't know if it was, though the fishy site might tell us!), we should be very worried.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 19:07
|
#5
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 5
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
I will tick the ones that did ok
arthur, cavanagh, king, murdock,edwards, miles, craney, ryan, richardson, mullin, clarke, subs used williams, grant, turner
nuff said
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 19:13
|
#6
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 11
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
...correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this pre-season, a time for results like this EVERYWHERE ?
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 19:22
|
#7
|
|
God Member
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christies Child
...correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this pre-season?
|
yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christies Child
...a time for results like this EVERYWHERE ?
|
no
__________________
All the opinions in my posts are just that - 'my' 'opinion' They do not necessarily contain any fact so cannot be libellous or defamatory. So don't bother suing me or this website
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 20:18
|
#8
|
|
Solipsist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Darkest Lancashire
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
Quite depressing overall today. Barrow were well in charge in the first half, where they not only scored twice (via Stanley 'reject' Jason Walker), but also hit the bar and the inside of the post. We didn't create anything, other than some poor shots from distance.
Second half was slightly better, not because we'd improved, but because Barrow seemed to let up and come down to our level.
The goal we scored was a Craney free-kick, but we created nothing from free play and as I said last week, I just don't know where the goals will come from.
The most worrying thing for me was when you looked at the bench, we had nothing there either. I know some people think that I always look for the negative and I admit that sometimes that is true, but today I saw some very worrying signs of what there is to come starting next week.
Anyway, here's a nice picture from today.

__________________
T.M.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 20:24
|
#9
|
|
Solipsist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Darkest Lancashire
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
To add to the humiliation, some old bloke seriously asked us if Stanley had sent their reserve team. He couldn't believe that the players on the pitch were the best we have. 
__________________
T.M.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 20:25
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Sonic Champion!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny Barrowford
Posts: 967
Rep Power: 8
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
That's quite a doody looking stand 
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 20:33
|
#11
|
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,359
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldgobbin
The Barrow unofficial forum says that if that was our first team (and I don't know if it was, though the fishy site might tell us!), we should be very worried.
|
If I was you I'd be more worried if it wasn't the first team playing than the result. I know Coley says they have crammed a lot of fitness training in but there's hardly been an abundance of matches to tone up on match fitness has there ?
Barrow beat what they say was an Oldham first team the other night, so maybe the result wasn't that bad. In friendlies the lower team does tend to try a bit more than the higher team, especially at home.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 20:44
|
#12
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 5
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
the team further up this thread was the team that played today  
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 22:13
|
#13
|
|
A True Accy Red
|
Re: barrow 2 1 stanley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pendle Red
That's quite a doody looking stand 
|
Joking aside if it was ours, the way it's going we would just about fill it with home fans by the end of the season. 
__________________
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They're only there to sign cheques." - Bill Shankly
|
|
|
|