Calling For Deduction To Fill Stadium For Remaining Games!!

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 09-03-2007, 14:22

With none of the transfer kitty amounted due to the sales of GR & IC being spent, I call for the remaining games to be priced at half price or less? I have heard the pros and cons, but we must pack the stadium for the remaining home fixtures, and it will not happen unless we try this. It might not work, we might not get a significent increase, but they can say "hey we tried" and every one will know that fans wont come if you practically let them in for free. This should be implemented for the Torquay game especially.

K.S.H · 09-03-2007, 14:27

It has been spent, it paid for the roof that went up in Jan/Feb

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 09-03-2007, 14:29

That invisible one, the transparent effect eh, recreating the future of stadia. Its great, your covered but you still get the sensation of rain falling on you.

accymel · 09-03-2007, 14:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H

It has been spent, it paid for the roof that went up in Jan/Feb

Is it the imaginary one o'er clayton end

accymel · 09-03-2007, 14:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus_was_A_red_

That invisible one, the transparent effect eh, recreating the future of stadia. Its great, your covered but you still get the sensation of rain falling on you.

yup that sounds like the one - gee its so realistic u actually get wet you'd think we didnt have one its that good

LOL!!

mr bean · 09-03-2007, 15:25

it shouldnt be chaeper becuse it is all going to the club i have no comlaints however because i am a season ticket holder

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 09-03-2007, 15:29

Are you happy with 1000 home fans, Is Eric Ebernezzer, are the players, NO.

maccawozzagod · 09-03-2007, 16:10

I agree totally, and have requested it numerous times. The most recent was the Mansfield 'replay'. That was a huge chance to really give summat back to the fans an charge a fiver, because they had already covered the costs at the original game and a fiver a head would have more than covered the cost of staging a game.

It wont happen.

But it should.

lancsdave · 09-03-2007, 16:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod

because they had already covered the costs at the original game and a fiver a head would have more than covered the cost of staging a game.

An intriguing statement Macca, Wouldn't the costs have been the more or less the same for both games ? Everybody will want paying for the abandoned game and then paying again for the re-arranged game.

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 09-03-2007, 16:38

Why should supporters pay twice to see the same team. If the club could be bothered to give us receipts ( a piece of paper - ticket stub) as we pay at the gate there would of been no excuses for charging again.

Oggy · 09-03-2007, 16:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus_was_A_red_

With none of the transfer kitty amounted due to the sales of GR & IC being spent, I call for the remaining games to be priced at half price or less? I have heard the pros and cons, but we must pack the stadium for the remaining home fixtures, and it will not happen unless we try this. It might not work, we might not get a significent increase, but they can say "hey we tried" and every one will know that fans wont come if you practically let them in for free. This should be implemented for the Torquay game especially.

Wrexham have sold over 4,000 tickets at a fiver a go for tonight's game against Bury. Estimated crowd 6,000 to 7,000.

Club should go for it against Torquay, we all need a lift!

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 09-03-2007, 16:51

You know it makes sense - Derek Trotter

lancsdave · 09-03-2007, 17:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus_was_A_red_

Why should supporters pay twice to see the same team. If the club could be bothered to give us receipts ( a piece of paper - ticket stub) as we pay at the gate there would of been no excuses for charging again.

The club had a right to charge you again though, any reduction in replays of abandoned games is purely a PR situation.