Crawley smash and grab

[cashman]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Don't know Cashy, seems like the twitter feed has taken it's place - to be fair we probably don't have enough personnel to run both - seems I'm gonna have to drag myself into this century

I thought it was a much better coverage on the fishy site. twitter is crap in my view

[cashman]

0-0 Half Time.

[Phil Whalley]

We're doing OK, trying to keep it on the deck, the better team. Just hasn't fallen quite right up front yet. Been caught on the break a couple of times, two tidy saves from Elliot, but apart from that they haven't threatened much. Not a bad game, Stanley trying to keep on the front foot and play at a good tempo. First goal, if it comes, will be crucial I think.

[yonmon]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Don't know Cashy, seems like the twitter feed has taken it's place - to be fair we probably don't have enough personnel to run both - seems I'm gonna have to drag myself into this century

Been following text from Dan all afternoon Di !.... BBC have been up to date as well..for once !

[AccyMad]

Any away point's always welcome I suppose, sounded a close game - guess a repeat of last year's route wasn't to be (we'll save that for Westley's lot next week)

[AccyMad]

Originally Posted by yonmon

Been following text from Dan all afternoon Di !.... BBC have been up to date as well..for once !

Where did you find the link for that Alan? I reckoned to look but must've missed it

[yonmon]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Where did you find the link for that Alan? I reckoned to look but must've missed it

Go to t'Fishy site...go to 'Team' on the menu bar ...drop the box...select 'match coverage '.

HEY PRESTO !

[maccawozzagod]

Me too

[AccyMad]

Originally Posted by yonmon

Go to t'Fishy site...go to 'Team' on the menu bar ...drop the box...select 'match coverage '.

HEY PRESTO !

Cheers, will remember that for next time

[cashman]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Any away point's always welcome I suppose, sounded a close game - guess a repeat of last year's route wasn't to be (we'll save that for Westley's lot next week)

The stats dont bear that out Di, we had 20 attempts to Crawleys 6 according to the bbc.

[KiTChener]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Cheers, will remember that for next time

me too, thanks Yonmon!

[sherry]

Text commentary been there all season apart from an odd one where there was a problem with the internet at the away ground.

[cashman]

Would have helped greatly if the club had mentioned that.

[Exile on Spencer St]

Pretty it was not, pretty dour it was. Stanley will no doubt feel they should have won as they created the better chances, but failed to convert any. Very crowded midfield, lots of beach ball heading, even more slipping backside over bosom, especially from MrGornell, when he wasn't bring penalised by the ref every time he challenged for the ball.
Was hoping to see Mr.Lacey strut his stuff in midfield but he just did OK, often needing or wanting a tad too much time and too many touches. But his task was made harder by rately having many options other than a short sideways pass to an already marked colleague.
Goalie and back four impressive again, and they dealt with Crawley's attempts to press in our penalty area much better than at Cambridge.
Best attacking move of the match, started by Matt Mattyhorn Pearson winning the ball just inside his own half and ending up barrelling his way onto their keeper, only to fire just wide.
Started the day being happy with the prospect of a point, so no complaints. But Stanley, especially their attacking midfield, still not quite there.

[maccawozzagod]

Originally Posted by cashman

Would have helped greatly if the club had mentioned that.

Why would they need to? Its always been there for any old numpty to find