 |
|
|
Accyweb Radio
|
|
|
|
| Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
|
30-08-2008, 16:45
|
#31
|
|
God Member
|
Re: Gillingham match
buggering eck - it was 0-0 when I sat down for tea!
Kenny'll have to just start again then won't he? FREEDOM!
__________________
All the opinions in my posts are just that - 'my' 'opinion' They do not necessarily contain any fact so cannot be libellous or defamatory. So don't bother suing me or this website
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:47
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Good ole Accy x
Posts: 1,782
|
Re: Gillingham match
Can i still come if i dont know owt about football?or is someone willing to teach me?
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:49
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,442
|
Re: Gillingham match
Beeb site says Macc 0 Darlo 6 and Chester 5 Barnet 0
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
Avatar: Albert Rimmer (1908 - 1980). Mid 1930's Accrington Stanley inside forward twice related to me by marriage.
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:50
|
#34
|
|
Solipsist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Darkest Lancashire
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: Gillingham match
I see that Sean Whalley scored twice today for Wrexham. He's having a good season.
__________________
T.M.
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:53
|
#35
|
|
God Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ASFC Supporters Club
Posts: 2,289
|
Re: Gillingham match
Quote:
Originally Posted by misskitty
Can i still come if i dont know owt about football?or is someone willing to teach me?
|
Of course u can  u will soon pick it up 
__________________
Stanleymad
59
.U.F.A.F.S.
ACCRINGTON STANLEY MAD!
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:58
|
#36
|
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,442
|
Re: Gillingham match
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haggis316
Beeb site says Macc 0 Darlo 6 and Chester 5 Barnet 0
|
Mannix and Barry were unused subs when I last looked. For whatever reason Harris did not feature in the squad.
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
Avatar: Albert Rimmer (1908 - 1980). Mid 1930's Accrington Stanley inside forward twice related to me by marriage.
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:59
|
#37
|
|
God Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ASFC Supporters Club
Posts: 2,289
|
Re: Gillingham match
Full time guys oh ****** back to the norm, [i so wish i did the reverse psych on predictions worked last 2 times  ]
__________________
Stanleymad
59
.U.F.A.F.S.
ACCRINGTON STANLEY MAD!
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 16:59
|
#38
|
|
God Member
|
Re: Gillingham match
Chester five nil
Harris out
Any coincidence?
__________________
All the opinions in my posts are just that - 'my' 'opinion' They do not necessarily contain any fact so cannot be libellous or defamatory. So don't bother suing me or this website
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 17:05
|
#39
|
|
Solipsist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Darkest Lancashire
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: Gillingham match
By not having Barry, Mannix and Harris in the starting line-up, they probably had midfielders that passed forward.
__________________
T.M.
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 17:28
|
#40
|
|
Junior Member+
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Gillingham match
harris probably suspended
|
|
|
30-08-2008, 20:30
|
#41
|
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,442
|
Re: Gillingham match
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
Avatar: Albert Rimmer (1908 - 1980). Mid 1930's Accrington Stanley inside forward twice related to me by marriage.
|
|
|
31-08-2008, 17:12
|
#42
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 444
|
Re: Gillingham match
Anyone on here go ? Sounds like it was a dogged defensive effort, with Kenny starring, that nearly got a reward, but were Gillingham good/bad/average ? And did we look up for it ?
__________________
Cart On Stanley - Stanley Cart On
Football Genius (cn) Manager capable of taking a club to, and maintaining it in, a league
two or more levels above that logically possible given available resources and support
e.g. John Coleman, Manager Accrington Stanley FC 1999-2009 (not out)
|
|
|
31-08-2008, 22:12
|
#43
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Gillingham match
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimer
Anyone on here go ? Sounds like it was a dogged defensive effort, with Kenny starring, that nearly got a reward, but were Gillingham good/bad/average ? And did we look up for it ?
|
Hi Chris,
To answer your questions, it was frustrating having got so close to full-time to concede when we did, but the goal was the culmination of a 10-minute period when we had barely got out of our box, and were it not for a combination of poor finishing and inspired goalkeeping by Kenny, the game would have been beyond us earlier.
Gillingham looked a decent side to me, they were very committed and rarely gave us any time on the ball. There are no complaints either about Stanley’s commitment, they gave it their all and we saw some tremendously tenacious defending from the entire back-four, we were just beaten by a more creative attacking side on the day. John Mullin and Procky don’t give us much pace in the middle and we missed the attacking thrust that Craney gave us from midfield. Their No.10, Jackson, the best player on display, did exactly that for the Gills and caused us no end of trouble.
The front two of Mullin and Clarke looks potentially good if they can work out how to combine most effectively, but Clarke needs quality service, and that was lacking yesterday. Incidentally, Mullers will have been kicking himself all the way back up north yesterday as he missed the sort of chance we’ve come to expect him to put away, nodding wide when picked out at the back post, although he wasn’t able to really attack the ball.
So no real complaints about the result, just a few worries about how we are going to link midfield to attack without resorting solely to lumping it up to Mullin.
See you soon
Phil
|
 | |