is this good news for stanley

davo69 · 18-05-2007, 12:34

page 15 telegraph today

Traceyb37 · 18-05-2007, 12:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by davo69

page 15 telegraph today

whats it say?

not got telepgraph yet!

panther · 18-05-2007, 12:36

summat about council funding em?

davo69 · 18-05-2007, 12:37

soccer chiefs and council in surch for new funding

MikeA · 19-05-2007, 07:23

Here's the link: http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk...lp_stanley.php.

It looks like positive stuff from all sides ...and the differences have been ironed out. Let's hope it succeeds

Bagpuss · 19-05-2007, 07:57

So Peter Britcliffe has realised that to not be on Stanley's side is a vote loser. Also Eric must have finally paid what he owes to the council but some how I doubt it, must have done a deal. Peter Britcliffe if you read this just remember who actually owns the land where the FES is built.

Wynonie Harris · 19-05-2007, 10:54

Well, it seems good news to me and, I would imagine, most other Stanley fans, but you seem almost disappointed, Bagpuss. And what do you mean by this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

Peter Britcliffe if you read this just remember who actually owns the land where the FES is built.

Are you suggesting that, because the council own the land, they should make life difficult for Stanley or have I misunderstood you?

ossyclogger · 19-05-2007, 11:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

Well, it seems good news to me and, I would imagine, most other Stanley fans, but you seem almost disappointed, Bagpuss. And what do you mean by this?

Are you suggesting that, because the council own the land, they should make life difficult for Stanley or have I misunderstood you?

No I don't think that you misunderstand what Sourpuss says . He always makes himself most clearly understood .

ossy kid · 19-05-2007, 16:37

I think it,s pretty clear what,s meant. The land is owned by the PEOPLE of Accrington.

Bagpuss · 19-05-2007, 18:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by ossyclogger

No I don't think that you misunderstand what Sourpuss says . He always makes himself most clearly understood .

As I have already had one warning this week I will ignore your uneducated comment.

Bagpuss · 19-05-2007, 18:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

Are you suggesting that, because the council own the land, they should make life difficult for Stanley or have I misunderstood you?

I did not need to respond because the sentence was aimed at Britcliffe but to put it simply so even clogger can understand. If the land where the FES is sold quite a bit of money will be raised, this money should be made available for Stanley to go towards building a new ground and not to go anywhere else. The land is council owned not Eric Whalleys or Peter Britcliffes land.

Wynonie Harris · 19-05-2007, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

If the land where the FES is sold quite a bit of money will be raised, this money should be made available for Stanley to go towards building a new ground and not to go anywhere else. The land is council owned not Eric Whalleys or Peter Britcliffes land.

OK, thanks for the clarification, Bagpuss. Still somewhat puzzled, though. Are you concerned that HBC have designs on selling the ground and using the money for something else?

mthead · 19-05-2007, 21:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

As I have already had one warning this week I will ignore your uneducated comment.

PMSL mate I didn't know they gave yellow cards out on here

Never had one off them