Stanley v Mansfield - Page 8

Zero · 31-12-2006, 13:06

Really the club should have a contingency plan for "What If" circumstances like this. The vouchers is the simplest idea cos you could have generic coupons which you drag out of the cupboard should the worst happen, dish em out as people leave then the club only needs to compensate the attendees who were disappointed.

Look to me from Kipax`s pics that there were quite a few made the 100 mile trek from mansfield, they should have been going home with a chitty for a half price/free invite to the replay. Thanks for coming.

Seeing how this wasn`t in place and the club have said it will be reduced admission for the replay we`ve gotta look at it as an opportunity to lure a few more down and hopefully have a fuller squad to play with.

BIG UP TO ALL WHO WENT
Anyone know the (alleged) Gate ?

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 13:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero

Really the club should have a contingency plan for "What If" circumstances like this.

It seems they have... there letting everyone in for reduced price the next time we play.... why isn't that a good idea ?

Tin Monkey · 31-12-2006, 14:06

That isn't a contingency plan. It's a 'made up on the fly' plan.

A nice gesture from the club and one that I hope pays dividends in terms of attendance at the replay.

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 14:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

That isn't a contingency plan. It's a 'made up on the fly' plan..

really? I wasnt aware of that.. I presumed this was always in there plans that if a game is abandoned then the rearranged would be cheaper.... my apologies.... BTW whats your source for this information TM ?

Tin Monkey · 31-12-2006, 14:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

really? I wasnt aware of that.. I presumed this was always in there plans that if a game is abandoned then the rearranged would be cheaper.... my apologies.... BTW whats your source for this information TM ?

Hmmm... in a previous thread you warn Oggy about making presumptions, but here you are doing the very same thing.

I have no source, but it's a fair assumption. Unlike others I don't spend all my time hanging around at the club.

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 14:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

Hmmm... in a previous thread you warn Oggy about making presumptions, but here you are doing the very same thing.

I have no source, but it's a fair assumption. Unlike others I don't spend all my time hanging around at the club.

excuse me ???? where have I warned anyone about anyhting ?...

oh so when you post that something is this that or the other.. its actually just what popped into your head then.. at least i preceeded my version with "it seems" you just said no..this is how it is. and all the time its what you guess it is... tut tut

Oggy · 31-12-2006, 14:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

I presumed this was always in there plans that if a game is abandoned then the rearranged would be cheaperTM ?

I presume the club would have announced details if it was a plan.

Presumably

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 14:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oggy

I presume the club would have announced details if it was a plan.

Presumably

they don't normally.... and that isn't guesswork

Tin Monkey · 31-12-2006, 14:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

excuse me ???? where have I warned anyone about anyhting ?...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

you take it wrong then oggy... try not to presume too much

Looks like a disciplinary to me.

We have to presume things, as the club tells us very little. Let's put it this way... I would be very, very surprised if there was a contingency plan already in place.

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 14:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

Looks like a disciplinary to me.

Well it would wouldn't it.. and to everyone else... now you quoted it without the smiley... Sorry TM but thats a bit pathetic of you...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

I would be very, very surprised if there was a contingency plan already in place.

Thats fair enough... but what you originally posted with a quote from me and to argue my view and you stated that it wasn't a plan and that it was on the fly...

I can only presume your having a bad day if your putting all this effort into trying to take me to task... your missquoting and backtracking would seem to show it to be a bit of a pointless exercise eh TM

iI simply stated that it "seemed" to be a plan... maybe you missunderstood that?

Tin Monkey · 31-12-2006, 14:59

Leaving off the smiley does not remove the meaning of the words. I simply showed that you had 'warned' Oggy about presuming (lightheartedly or not) and that was the case. I didn't misquote you. I changed no words.

I am not backtracking either. My point still stands and is every bit as valid as your's in your next post. You state that the club have a contingency plan which involves a reduced admission price next time. How do you know that was an existing contingency plan and not a plan made up on the fly as I suggested?

KIPAX · 31-12-2006, 15:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

Leaving off the smiley does not remove the meaning of the words. I simply showed that you had 'warned' Oggy about presuming (lightheartedly or not) and that was the case. I didn't misquote you. I changed no words.

why do you keep saying i warned him when i didnt? also have you noticed your the only one remotely bothered...oggy doesnt seem to be and I aint.. so whats your problem.... Also removing the smiley takes away the intent of the message

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

I am not backtracking either.

your first poste stated it was a plan made on the fly.... you then backtracked by saying you guess it was.... either your saying it was or your summizing it was... make a choice

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

I. ou state that the club have a contingency plan which involves a reduced admission price next time. How do you know that was an existing contingency plan and not a plan made up on the fly as I suggested?

This is the bit where your falling flat on your face TM and I notice your not quoting what I said.. just re doing it in your own words

.... Unlike you who stated it as on the fly... I said "it seems they have a plan" as in SEEMS not as in fact....