I've just listened to the interview now and, from what I could make of it, it didn't sound to bad. Yes he was saying players could have done better at the goal, the chance Josh had and going forward but I didn't take it to be in an overly critical manner.
Where I disagree with him is that we could have won it. Yes we created chances and made thr keeper save some but they were mostly from distance and were often blocked by the Bury defenders. Most of the follow up corners were either ineffective or straight to the keeper. Bury were not that good a team on the night and were probably the worst of the three we have just played but we had no goal threat in the centre. We were getting forward but often no one in the middle to press home an attack. Bury may have had fewer attacks but they were more likely to score with them than we were and there keeper had a better chance at scoring than most of our team

.
There is no point Coley going on about we weren't complaining 4 games ago because that is in the past. Anyone watching that style of play will know how to combat it and 3 games on we are on a 3 game losing run and with the games coming up I wouldn't be surprised if the winless streak continues if we keep playing like that. It needs to change and we need someone who is a striker playing as a striker.
If the players we have don't suit Coley's system then we either get new players or change the system and I can't see any money for new players. Greece didn't become European Champions by having a system and fitting players into it the manager devised a system to suit the players he had and it worked.
I won't read any response from Dav0 since he is on my ignore list but, in case he talks his usual rhymes with fish, I do not hate Coley nor do I want him sacked and replaced by Beattie, I just want to see us winning again and I doubt we will win many the way we were playing in the last three games.
So, Dav0 spare us your usual drivel!!