Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pendy
It does seem from what appears above that the family were given the option of the father giving up work to assist mother in looking after the children. If he did so, the implication is that the children could remain with their parents. He did not choose to do so.
|
Well at least he was trying to support his, CHILDREN and his wife by working.
I know a lot of families that wouldn't really give a flying **** and just go straight onto benefits, loads easier wouldn't you say.
Yeah well the man did right, SELF RESPECT is important to. Who would have paid for these children had he given up work?? Yes the tax payers I most certainly think.
Isn't it better children grow up to see at least one parent working to support the family??.
And the social services had no right in trying to make a man that works for a living, give up work, just because his wife has learning difficulties.
