[WillowTheWhisp]

Originally Posted by Stanleymad

Actually its because of duty of care that they didnt, in law precidence has already been set where someone doing a good deed like saving someone actually was done criminally for duty of care even though they only tried to save someone. Legally u help or try to get involved & it doesn't go right or failure, the basic human instinct to help can become a criminal act - stangely, because u take the responsiblity for it.

Something i learnt in law about this type of thing in the duty of care legality. CSO's or any persons employed would be warned about taking something on without training or permission for this reason, so hence why could be deemed sackable.

So what is the point of learning First Aid? None at all as far as I can see if you then use it to save someone and become a criminal for having done so.

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J

Well someone want to tell me why the 13:00 NEWS which I heard it from originally broadcast it wrong then? I have no problem with taking the heat by the by and it may be justified but how many read the article plus the archive ones there as well.

I watched the story on Granada Reports at about the same time Spuggie and the reporter certainly told it as if the lad was there and clearly visible and the two CSOs just ignored his cries for help.