Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Monkey
Although the name is well known, the problem is that it's known for largely negative associations. Resigning from the league mid-season and as a foil for many jokes (i.e. comparisons with general mediocrity and poorness ), doesn't really project the right kind of brand image.
|
Yes, as we've discussed elsewhere on here, Stanley is a convenient metaphor for the underachieving side of football for third-rate comedians and lazy journalists. But out there amongst the public at large, there's an amazing amount of affection for and interest in Stanley almost as a British institution. Phil Whalley described it perfectly in his book.
I'm sure there must be some way to turn that affection round to our advantage. I can't quite figure out how, but hopefully, Marcelle can!
