Accrington Web - View Single Post

Greeny · 02-11-2009, 13:08

If / when the taxman is paid , in a realistic world Eric Whalley should be paid too, then that is another problem gone.Whilst he is still owed money for his shares , he has every right to be in Accrington Stanley., the real question I as is, is David ONiell right to be in there if he has not paid for the shares.Surely there is a loophole somewhere. Also if Eric does still own is shares is it legal for him to be involved at Chester ? Personally, I have no idea , it is only hearsay , but I am sure someone on this site will know the correct circumstances. How about you Tealeaf ? any idea.

02-11-2009, 13:08	#8
Greeny Full Member+ Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 817 Liked: 210 times Rep Power: 6828	Re: 'red letter ?'.. Mark 2 ! If / when the taxman is paid , in a realistic world Eric Whalley should be paid too, then that is another problem gone.Whilst he is still owed money for his shares , he has every right to be in Accrington Stanley., the real question I as is, is David ONiell right to be in there if he has not paid for the shares.Surely there is a loophole somewhere. Also if Eric does still own is shares is it legal for him to be involved at Chester ? Personally, I have no idea , it is only hearsay , but I am sure someone on this site will know the correct circumstances. How about you Tealeaf ? any idea.