Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Oswaldtwistle (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f103/)
-   -   What a shame (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f103/what-a-shame-43040.html)

park381 03-10-2008 18:46

What a shame
 
3 Attachment(s)
LET Thursday 2nd October

Oswaldtwistle park's £1m lottery bid rejected (From Lancashire Telegraph)

What can you say about that.
I take my hat off to Neil & the friends of Rhyddings Park for saying that they will continue to bid for grants to complete the planned work, which includes improvements to pathways and drainage.

Are repairs to pathways not HBC's responsibility, are the parks not allocated a "maintenance budget"

How much has HBC spent on maintenance in Rhyddings Park over the last 10 years.............not a lot, or should that be nothing at all

Should HBC not be repairing paths and sorting out drainage in the park as an on going maintenance project, or should we say " Planned Maintenance"

What a sad mess Rhyddings Park has become, all because of the lack of maintenance budgets not being spent where they should be.






garinda 03-10-2008 18:55

Re: What a shame
 
It is a shame the bid for Lotto money wasn't successful. However the park, and others in the area, used to be maintained to a much higher standard, without the need to go cap in hand as a 'worthy cause'.

The paths aren't just unsightly they are dangerous.

I guess councils of years gone by were better at using money from our rates, which saw well cared for paths, tennis courts, a putting green, two top rate bowling greens, a paddling pool, beautiful flower beds supplied by the park's own green houses, and even paid for the services of a park keeper who chased out those who ventured in after dark.

AccyLass 03-10-2008 19:01

Re: What a shame
 
Are there no people to help, I mean volunteer with keeping the park tidy and stuff, obviously not fixing important things that will need doing I just mean helping with the general stuff so money could be spent elsewhere

Obviously I know nothing about the maintenance of the park, I'm just asking:)

katex 03-10-2008 19:06

Re: What a shame
 
Yes, 'tis sad, I don't think Rhyddings is too bad actually, presume you have read the threads on Milnshaw Park ... now that is a dump... hope they obtain the lottery funding they have applied for.

Again, only so much money in the pot for the HBC maintaining these parks ... :( (without increasing council tax !)

park381 03-10-2008 19:18

Re: What a shame
 
All sections of a council have/had a budget for maintenance, and for planned maintenance, be it for adverts, be it for what ever. The Parks section of HBC has/had a budget, both for what they call day/day maintenance and planned maintenance. What have they done with it over the last 25 years

So the question is asked what has the park's budget been spent on, not on the parks.

The decline of Rhyddings Park has been over the last 25 years. Maintenance funds were plentiful in those days.

AccyLass 03-10-2008 19:21

Re: What a shame
 
So they are given a 25 yr budget so to speak?

25 yrs before?

Or they have a yearly budget that obviously aint enough cos it hasn't sorted everything?

park381 03-10-2008 19:31

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 637560)
only so much money in the pot for the HBC maintaining these parks ... :( (without increasing council tax !)

Kate, we are not talking of the present here we are talking of the last 25 years.
I have watched Rhyddings Park in the decline, living facing the park for 27 years.
Things in local gov. were not as "tight" 25 years ago, councils used to have a "get it spent month" before the end of March. Money would be spent on anything and every thing, but obviously not Rhyddings Park.

Lilly 03-10-2008 20:17

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 637555)

I guess councils of years gone by were better at using money from our rates, which saw well cared for paths, tennis courts, a putting green, two top rate bowling greens, a paddling pool, beautiful flower beds supplied by the park's own green houses, and even paid for the services of a park keeper who chased out those who ventured in after dark.

In years gone by parks didn't suffer the trouble they do now.

They now suffer so much vandalism so it seems to me that the reason we don't have the things you mentioned is because it costs too much money to provide these things and then to have to constantly fork out for repairs/replacements due to vandalism. :(

In this age of the personal injury claim, nothing can be seen to be unsafe or have the potential to cause injury.....so best not put it there in the first place.

That's just my take on it.

WillowTheWhisp 03-10-2008 20:26

Re: What a shame
 
Bullough Park is a disgrace too. It's not fit to call a park and the path down to Perth Street is like something from Sleeping Beauty's Castle.

garinda 03-10-2008 21:22

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 637580)
In years gone by parks didn't suffer the trouble they do now.

They now suffer so much vandalism so it seems to me that the reason we don't have the things you mentioned is because it costs too much money to provide these things and then to have to constantly fork out for repairs/replacements due to vandalism. :(

In this age of the personal injury claim, nothing can be seen to be unsafe or have the potential to cause injury.....so best not put it there in the first place.

That's just my take on it.

Within my not that old a memory the council had a park warden, whose twenty four hour presence deterred vandalism, and those seeking to do mischief, and funded via our rates. Vandalism is nothing new, and is certainly not an excuse for properly maintaining the paths, and draining the playing field.

As for now living in an injury claim culture, the terrible state of the park paths mean that more accidents will happen, and as I believe our council pay out on any claim submittted without defending the action, in the short, as well as long term, it makes very little economic sense, even by H.B.C.'s standards.

Lilly 03-10-2008 21:26

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 637615)
Within my not that old a memory the council had a park warden, whose twenty four hour presence deterred vandalism, and those seeking to do mischief, and funded via our rates. Vandalism is nothing new, and is certainly not an excuse for properly maintaining the paths, and draining the playing field.

As for now living in an injury claim culture, the terrible state of the park paths mean that more accidents will happen, and as I believe our council pay out on any claim submittted without defending the action, in the short, as well as long term, it makes very little economic sense, even by H.B.C.'s standards.

I know vandalism is nothing new but it wasn't as bad 50 years ago as it is now.

Nothing's safe these days. Agreed, we could do with a return to the park warden but, as has been discussed on the corporal punishment thread, he would have very little powers these days and would probably be beaten up if he dared to challenge anyone. :mad:

garinda 03-10-2008 21:34

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 637620)
I know vandalism is nothing new but it wasn't as bad 50 years ago as it is now.

Nothing's safe these days. Agreed, we could do with a return to the park warden but, as has been discussed on the corporal punishment thread, he would have very little powers these days and would probably be beaten up if he dared to challenge anyone. :mad:

The appalling state of the parks, and the withholding of funding that should be used to maintain them, as nothing to do with vandalism. It's about the use of funds, and poor management.

They gave us flower towers, call us a 'Floral Market Town', yet our parks, once filled with beautiful displays of bedding plants, raised by the park's own gardening department, are now bare of flowers except for the odd Dandelion.

Neil 03-10-2008 22:09

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637554)
I take my hat off to Neil & the friends of Rhyddings Park for saying that they will continue to bid for grants to complete the planned work, which includes improvements to pathways and drainage.

Thank you for that.
We refuse to sit on our backsides and will be actively seeking other bids on our own. The main lottery bid was in fact made by the Council with us on the project team assisting in every way we could.
The Friends of Rhyddings Park are now applying for funding themselves with HBC assisting us as required with things like suppliers and planning issues. We have our first meeting with an equipment designer/supplier on Tuesday and Gayle is already working on funding application forms. Like I said we are not sat down doing nothing :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637554)
Are repairs to pathways not HBC's responsibility, are the parks not allocated a "maintenance budget"

All work in the park is HBC's responsibility. The only odd bit is Pets Corner which is managed by the Friends under the supervision of the Council. It has to be that way as they are responsible for everything in the park.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637554)
How much has HBC spent on maintenance in Rhyddings Park over the last 10 years.............not a lot, or should that be nothing at all

Not enough would be more accurate than not a lot. Because of this long ongoing bid - well over 3 years this time and a previous bid failed 10 years ago (ish), money had not been spent in the park. I do agree to a point that you would not want to spend a lot of money to find a refurbishment program paid for by lottery money undid some of the work you spent money on. Unfortuneatly this has led to the park falling into a very poor state. Lots of work should have been carried out just to keep paths safe etc.


Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637554)
What a sad mess Rhyddings Park has become, all because of the lack of maintenance budgets not being spent where they should be.

Fair point I think - money was spent elsewhere in the belief that a massive revamp was on its way. This would not have been too bad if the bid process had not dragged on for as long as it has done - still now it is not completed as the bid has been resubmitted for a final time to this particular funding body so we are waiting again. The only difference now is that the Council have agreed to do some of the work that is needed anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637561)
So the question is asked what has the park's budget been spent on, not on the parks.

I believe the parks budget is underfunded both in capital money and in man power.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637561)
The decline of Rhyddings Park has been over the last 25 years. Maintenance funds were plentiful in those days.

I am glad you said that. For many years now previous and current Councils have found themselves cutting the budgets available for our parks. This takes years to show itself as a problem as the parks slowly fell apart. Millions of pounds are needed to restore several parks in Hyndburn to the sort of standard that we all expect. The actual cost of refurbishing Rhyddings Park is well over £2 million. Years of neglect by many Councils have caused it, I hope that the Councils of the next few years can find the money to sort it out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 637580)
In years gone by parks didn't suffer the trouble they do now.

They now suffer so much vandalism so it seems to me that the reason we don't have the things you mentioned is because it costs too much money to provide these things and then to have to constantly fork out for repairs/replacements due to vandalism. :(

Another problem is that the vandalism is not being repaired. The Council have to work with the Police to sort out many of the issues we have in the parks.

Local residents don't help either. I am expecting a lot of resistance ( we have had some already ) about our plans to puts things into Rhyddings park for the secondary school sort of age group. They have nothing to do and no where to go in the park. They end up hanging around in the kiddies play area - many of them started playing in there when it was new and they were in primary school. There is nothing for them to move on to so they stay. They also hang around on the benches around the bowling green which causes problems as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 637584)
Bullough Park is a disgrace too. It's not fit to call a park and the path down to Perth Street is like something from Sleeping Beauty's Castle.

In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have? I am sure it was funded from some grant or another but when that ends HBC will have to pay to maintain it.

Maybe Accrington should loose one of its parks, it has several while Oswaldtwistle only has one park yet has half the population of Accrington. The park is also close to the towns border with Spring Hill so attracts a lot of visitors from that area of Accrington as well.

One interesting figure I have just pulled out of the bid is that the population within a 1km catchment area of the park is over 14,000.

garinda 03-10-2008 23:00

Re: What a shame
 
By the way, I'm not having a go at the Friends of Rhyddings Park, I think they're doing a great job. I just think the council were wrong withholding funding for essential maintenance, in the hope of perhaps securing funding from the Lottery.

Pie in the sky.

Neil 03-10-2008 23:08

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 637656)
I just think the council were wrong withholding funding for essential maintenance, in the hope of perhaps securing funding from the Lottery.

So do I for essential works.

katex 03-10-2008 23:51

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637638)
In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have?
Maybe Accrington should loose one of its parks, it has several while Oswaldtwistle only has one park yet has half the population of Accrington.

Agree Neil, (did try to put this thought up on last post, but timed out, too busy chatting :rolleyes:) too many parks now .. people don't utilise them at all .. have cars and travel away for the weekend, and access on leisure hours to other venues. Was different in the old days during industrial success .. think some could be flattened and just green open spaces for walking areas.

park381 04-10-2008 07:19

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637638)
Another problem is that the vandalism is not being repaired. The Council have to work with the Police to sort out many of the issues we have in the parks.

What of the CCTV adjacent to the play area, and the Ryhddings Park N.W. and their cameras, are none of them working?
Quote:

Local residents don't help either. I am expecting a lot of resistance ( we have had some already ) about our plans to puts things into Rhyddings park for the secondary school sort of age group. They have nothing to do and no where to go in the park. They end up hanging around in the kiddies play area - many of them started playing in there when it was new and they were in primary school. There is nothing for them to move on to so they stay. They also hang around on the benches around the bowling green which causes problems as well.
By local residents, do you mean the ones living on Park Lane?
I have seen the teenagers (secondary school age group) cause problems for many years, they have no respect for other peoples property. What are the police and LCC doing, has the youth club on Harvey street been closed.
Quote:

In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have? I am sure it was funded from some grant or another but when that ends HBC will have to pay to maintain it.
Was the Henry street one not a "Remade" project with external funding, I have never seen the gates fronting Henry street unlocked yet, may be the area is only for show and not for playing on :confused:
Quote:

Maybe Accrington should loose one of its parks, it has several while Oswaldtwistle only has one park yet has half the population of Accrington. The park is also close to the towns border with Spring Hill so attracts a lot of visitors from that area of Accrington as well.

What about all the green space fronting Blackburn road, what are HBC doing to clean that up. On the subject of Accrington loosing one of its parks, what would you like to see in its place, blocks of flats.
No I think HBC should get its act together and stop spending silly money on hiring high flying consultants to carry out all these pointless surveys, money that could and should have been spent on park maintenance. Has there not already one been carried out on the number of parks/green spaces in Hyndburn, have the results from that survey been published yet?

Morecambe Ex Pat 04-10-2008 08:26

Re: What a shame
 
Out of interest, where do convicted offenders do their community service?
If the very people convicted of vandalism were the ones tidying the parks up they may, just may develop a bit of civic pride.

AccyLass 04-10-2008 12:05

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morecambe Ex Pat (Post 637683)
Out of interest, where do convicted offenders do their community service?
If the very people convicted of vandalism were the ones tidying the parks up they may, just may develop a bit of civic pride.


Excellent point!

park381 04-10-2008 12:09

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morecambe Ex Pat (Post 637683)
Out of interest, where do convicted offenders do their community service?
If the very people convicted of vandalism were the ones tidying the parks up they may, just may develop a bit of civic pride.

A very good point, could we add a few more to that group :D

churchman phil 04-10-2008 13:24

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637638)


In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have? I am sure it was funded from some grant or another but when that ends HBC will have to pay to maintain it.

This area is a complete waste of money. Apart from the enclosed 'Football Pitch'* - which kids can't use 'cos it's always locked - there hasn't been anything created for the kids. It's just a landscaped mess imo that is fast becoming a doggie toilet.
Oh!! Sorry, my mistake, theres a couple of picnic benches to vandalise.

*If it is possible to call it such. I watched for a number of days as the workmen went about 'levelling' the area. It's awful!! Slopes in at least two directions, grass is sparse, no goalposts and it ain't even marked out the last I saw! Pointless operation.

So I have to agree Neil - the money would have been better off being directed to other parks in the borough.

Neil 04-10-2008 14:08

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by churchman phil (Post 637748)
This area is a complete waste of money. Apart from the enclosed 'Football Pitch'* - which kids can't use 'cos it's always locked - there hasn't been anything created for the kids.

Please describe what that is please. I have not actually stopped to look but just passed it on Henry Street.

I must have a look at it when I get chance.

park381 04-10-2008 14:15

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637638)
In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have? I am sure it was funded from some grant or another but when that ends HBC will have to pay to maintain it.

Maybe Accrington should loose one of its parks, it has several while Oswaldtwistle only has one park yet has half the population of Accrington. The park is also close to the towns border with Spring Hill so attracts a lot of visitors from that area of Accrington as well.

One interesting figure I have just pulled out of the bid is that the population within a 1km catchment area of the park is over 14,000.

Neil, here's your chance to have a say in the number of parks in Hyndburn our council are after comments and thoughts, to influence the "new borough development plan"
Have on a say on Hyndburn's future developments (From Lancashire Telegraph)


park381 04-10-2008 14:20

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637638)
In my opinion Hyndburn has too many green spaces to look after with the current size of its parks department. I was very disapointed when they created the new one off Henry Street in Church. Why create a new one when they can't afford to look after what they have? I am sure it was funded from some grant or another but when that ends HBC will have to pay to maintain it.

Maybe Accrington should loose one of its parks, it has several while Oswaldtwistle only has one park yet has half the population of Accrington. The park is also close to the towns border with Spring Hill so attracts a lot of visitors from that area of Accrington as well.

One interesting figure I have just pulled out of the bid is that the population within a 1km catchment area of the park is over 14,000.

Neil, here's your chance to have a say in the number of parks in Hyndburn our council are after comments and thoughts, to influence the "new borough development plan"
Have on a say on Hyndburn's future developments (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Perhaps they should sell off part of Rhyddings Park to a poperty developer to build some houses, and write a clause in to the planning permission, that the developer maintains the remaining part of the park for 10 years on completion of the development.
That could also apply to other parks in the borough

Looks like a double post, sorry about that


Neil 04-10-2008 15:11

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637775)
Perhaps they should sell off part of Rhyddings Park to a poperty developer to build some houses, and write a clause in to the planning permission, that the developer maintains the remaining part of the park for 10 years on completion of the development.
That could also apply to other parks in the borough

If the park was bigger it might be a good option.

We are struggling to fit what we feel is needed in the park with its current size. As I posted above it has a high population to service - 14,000 within 1km

park381 04-10-2008 15:40

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 637808)
If the park was bigger it might be a good option.

We are struggling to fit what we feel is needed in the park with its current size. As I posted above it has a high population to service - 14,000 within 1km


I think the park is big enough, you would get a few high value houses on there.
Are there not several football/playing fields also within 1km, what about those? Why try to re-invent the wheel.

park381 04-10-2008 16:11

Re: What a shame
 
Here's the form..have your say

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...s_Proforma.pdf

Neil 05-10-2008 07:19

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 637847)

I think the park is big enough, you would get a few high value houses on there.
Are there not several football/playing fields also within 1km, what about those? Why try to re-invent the wheel.

I meant the Park is not big enough to cut a chunk off and still be suitable for its catchment area. It is similar in size to parks with a much smaller population than Oswaldtwistle and half the size of Cutwood Park in Rhiston.

Access is also a problem.

Below is a list of recreation grounds currently maintained by Hyndburn Borough Council as stated on their website. None of which are in Ossy - there may be green spaces that don't belong to HBC like off Fielding Lane but these belong to LCC and Rhyddings School (sort of).

Quote:

  • Arden Hall Recreation Ground ~ Accrington
  • Belthorn Recreation Ground ~ Belthorn
  • Baxenden Recreation Ground ~ Baxenden
  • Lyndon Avenue Recreation Ground ~ Great Harwood
  • Alan Ramsbottom Way / Heys Lane Recreation Ground ~ Great Harwood
  • Windsor Road Recreation Ground ~ Great Harwood
  • Bolton Avenue Recreation Ground (Below) ~ Huncoat*
  • Station Road Recreation Ground ~ Huncoat
  • Knuzden Recreation Ground ~ Knuzden
  • Harwood Road Recreation Ground~ Rishton
  • Holt Street Recreation Ground~ Rishton


park381 05-10-2008 07:49

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638045)
I meant the Park is not big enough to cut a chunk off and still be suitable for its catchment area. It is similar in size to parks with a much smaller population than Oswaldtwistle and half the size of Cutwood Park in Rhiston.

Access is also a problem.

Below is a list of recreation grounds currently maintained by Hyndburn Borough Council as stated on their website. None of which are in Ossy - there may be green spaces that don't belong to HBC like off Fielding Lane but these belong to LCC and Rhyddings School (sort of).

Access to Ryhddings park has always been a problem, and always will be until HBC provide some parking spaces in the park.

I also thought that all parks were there for all to enjoy not just the adjacent catchment area to a specific park

You forgot Harvey street, both sides of the road, that's in Ossy, and is a large area of land, green space.

I thought Knuzden was part of Ossy ? or has it been moved over the border without us knowing :confused:

Neil 05-10-2008 20:39

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638053)
Access to Rhyddings park has always been a problem, and always will be until HBC provide some parking spaces in the park.

Parking was in the bid but for users of the Coaching House. PArt of the problem with parking is that people want to park 12" from the park gates then go and walk around the park. The park has been here well before cars were common. Parking is always going to be a problem for Rhyddings Park as it is for a lot of Oswaldtwistle.

When we held our last event we tried to encourage local people to walk to the park and leave theirs cars at home.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638053)
I also thought that all parks were there for all to enjoy not just the adjacent catchment area to a specific park

Of course they are but funding bids often refer to the 1km catchment area so it is bid talk really. It also points out the high number very local to the park.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638053)
You forgot Harvey street, both sides of the road, that's in Ossy, and is a large area of land, green space.

I did not forget it but for some reason it is not mentioned on the HBC website where I took my quote from. I wondered if it belonged to LCC like the area off Fielding Lane.
One side is mainly bookable football pitches and the other is a nice large grassed area. Neither side can really be classed as a true formal park.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638053)
I thought Knuzden was part of Ossy ? or has it been moved over the border without us knowing :confused:

I don't understand the question.

shillelagh 06-10-2008 00:06

Re: What a shame
 
Does Hyndburn council not look after oakhill park? Another thing the football pitches might come under the leisure trust .........

park381 06-10-2008 06:49

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638045)
Below is a list of recreation grounds currently maintained by Hyndburn Borough Council as stated on their website. None of which are in Ossy - there may be green spaces that don't belong to HBC like off Fielding Lane but these belong to LCC and Rhyddings School (sort of).

Knuzden is part of Ossy, its in St Oswalds Ward and is served by the councillors Haworth, Hayes, & Roberts. The boundry of St Oswalds ward goes right up to Knuzden Brook which is also the boundry of Hyndburn, so the statement of "None of which are in Ossy" is not correct


http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/site/sc...egoryID=200073

Neil 06-10-2008 08:56

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638401)
so the statement of "None of which are in Ossy" is not correct

You are of course correct. It is not very accessible for the local kids in my area that we are trying to keep of the streets so they can be somewhere safe though is it?

I have stated many times that youth shelters need to be in several places in Oswaldtwistle as kids are quite territorial and stick to there own areas and group of friends.

Unfortunately The Friends of Rhyddings Park only work in Rhyddings Park.

I really do wish even more people would form community groups within their close areas of Hyndburn and start to tap into some of the resources that HBC can not. There are many already but I am sure many more areas would benefit. I am involved with the park because it is close to me. You too could be involved with a group close to your area and do similar good works, if you are not already.

Where are you and is there a community group for you area?
If there is are you involved?
If not you could always tart your own.

park381 06-10-2008 16:12

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638426)
You are of course correct. It is not very accessible for the local kids in my area that we are trying to keep of the streets so they can be somewhere safe though is it?

I thought we were talking about kids of secondary school age here, since there is already a "small childrens play area in the park."
Quote:

I have stated many times that youth shelters need to be in several places in Oswaldtwistle as kids are quite territorial and stick to there own areas and group of friends.
Youth shelters ? is that a new term
Quote:

Unfortunately The Friends of Rhyddings Park only work in Rhyddings Park.
The name of the group suggests that, keep up the good work
Quote:


Quote:

I really do wish even more people would form community groups within their close areas of Hyndburn and start to tap into some of the resources that HBC can not. There are many already but I am sure many more areas would benefit. I am involved with the park because it is close to me. You too could be involved with a group close to your area and do similar good works, if you are not already.
Where are you and is there a community group for you area?
If there is are you involved?
If not you could always tart your own.
No there is no community group where I now live, but I have managed to get a police presence, and a pact meeting in a local pub along with promises of further monthly meetings to be attended by community support officers and a local councillor. That was after contacting a local councillor and indicating that the area is the forgotten area of Hyndburn and there could be serious problems in the future if they were not dealt with now, also that we had never ever seen any police officers or community support officers in the area. May be these meetings could lead to some form of community group, we will have to wait and see.

Neil 06-10-2008 16:52

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638584)
No there is no community group where I now live, but I have managed to get a police presence, and a pact meeting in a local pub along with promises of further monthly meetings to be attended by community support officers and a local councillor. That was after contacting a local councillor and indicating that the area is the forgotten area of Hyndburn and there could be serious problems in the future if they were not dealt with now, also that we had never ever seen any police officers or community support officers in the area. May be these meetings could lead to some form of community group, we will have to wait and see.

Sounds good mate, keep up the good work.

Have a read of this, there is a pdf to download at the bottom right of the page, if you get a group going maybe you could sort something out in Knuzden.

HBC wanted to put one over West End I think it was a couple of years ago. The residents complained so it never happened :(

park381 06-10-2008 17:05

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638597)
Sounds good mate, keep up the good work.

Have a read of this, there is a pdf to download at the bottom right of the page, if you get a group going maybe you could sort something out in Knuzden.

HBC wanted to put one over West End I think it was a couple of years ago. The residents complained so it never happened :(

Thanks for the info, will have a read. Are you looking at trying to put one in the park?

Neil 06-10-2008 17:32

Re: What a shame
 
We have a meeting with the company that installed the kiddie play area in Rhyddings to get some quotes and ides from tomorrow. I like the MUGA's with seating built into the fencing but not sure if this company does them. They do smallish shelters - about 8' across and roundish with a roof and partially enclosed sides.

After we have an idea of what we can do and costs we intend to put our suggestion to our intended audience and see what they think. We are getting costings first so we can see if it is feasible for us to continue any further.

I am expecting some resistance to it because most people wont read something like that document I linked for you. When they do they don't want to believe it will help the situation. We are not just talking those immediately facing the park either.

Who said progress was easy? :D

garinda 06-10-2008 18:01

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638609)
We have a meeting with the company that installed the kiddie play area in Rhyddings to get some quotes and ides from tomorrow. I like the MUGA's with seating built into the fencing but not sure if this company does them. They do smallish shelters - about 8' across and roundish with a roof and partially enclosed sides.

After we have an idea of what we can do and costs we intend to put our suggestion to our intended audience and see what they think. We are getting costings first so we can see if it is feasible for us to continue any further.

I am expecting some resistance to it because most people wont read something like that document I linked for you. When they do they don't want to believe it will help the situation. We are not just talking those immediately facing the park either.

Who said progress was easy? :D

Sounds like a good idea to me. Older children still go in the park after dark, having their own designated space sounds a very sensible idea.

There'll always be some stick in the muds, who'll oppose change for whatever reason. Probably the same person/people who thought the new children's play area was an eyesore from their front rooms on Park Lane, and who tried to say that it would, wrongly, attract more vandalism.

Good luck.

park381 06-10-2008 18:06

Re: What a shame
 
If you are thinking of adjacent to the kids play area then yes I think you will get some resistance from residents. Would you not require planning permission or would it be a permissible development.
Changing the subject, how is the "light" in the park is it still operating and what effect is it having on vandals if any.

Is there any CCTV coverage in the park.

Is the Rhyddings Park N.W. still active ?


garinda 06-10-2008 18:22

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638625)
If you are thinking of adjacent to the kids play area then yes I think you will get some resistance from residents. Would you not require planning permission or would it be a permissible development.
Changing the subject, how is the "light" in the park is it still operating and what effect is it having on vandals if any.

Is there any CCTV coverage in the park.

Is the Rhyddings Park N.W. still active ?

There is CCTV of the park.

As far as I can see the light has reduced vandalism after dark, and I hear residents on Park Lane no longer suffer fron S.A.D., which must be an added benefit.:D

park381 06-10-2008 18:28

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 638622)
There'll always be some stick in the muds, who'll oppose change for whatever reason. Probably the same person/people who thought the new children's play area was an eyesore from their front rooms on Park Lane, and who tried to say that it would, wrongly, attract more vandalism.
Good luck.

Without wishing to cover old ground again, the Planning Officer in her report to the planning committee in connection with the planning application for the light in the play area, refered to the childrens play area as "the unfortunate siting of the play area". Which indicated that even she was not happy with the location of the play area. A project that was pushed through by an HBC Parks Officer and a local Councillor (permitted development)
The planning application for the lighting column was required because the height of the lighting column proposed was 8M.
The height of the lighting column actually installed was only 4M, HBC could have saved the expense of the planning application, since a 4M column did not need planning permission. :D



garinda 06-10-2008 18:33

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638636)
Without wishing to cover old ground again


Good, as I can report the new play area is not only safer, and less vandalised than it was at the old site, but used much more by the children, all year round.:)

Any drop in property prices of neighbouring houses has more to do with the global credit crunch, than the siting of the play area.;)

MargaretR 06-10-2008 18:39

Re: What a shame
 
When I was born and raised on Hornby St (next street downhill) in the 40s, Park Lane was the classy place to live in Ossy.
Nowadays car ownership must detract from that - narrow street with bumper to bumper parking

garinda 06-10-2008 18:40

Re: What a shame
 
Not totally sure, but from memory, and seeing photographs of the park being opened in 1912, the park was there before the houses on Park Lane.;)

park381 06-10-2008 19:15

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 638640)
Good, as I can report the new play area is not only safer, and less vandalised than it was at the old site, but used much more by the children, all year round.:)

Got to be 4 years or more old by now. Will be getting ready for replacement. :D
Quote:

Any drop in property prices of neighbouring houses has more to do with the global credit crunch, than the siting of the play area.;)
Got a good price for mine. :D

park381 06-10-2008 19:23

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 638644)
When I was born and raised on Hornby St (next street downhill) in the 40s, Park Lane was the classy place to live in Ossy.
Nowadays car ownership must detract from that - narrow street with bumper to bumper parking

Not many residents with cars when we moved on to the lane.

One of the reasons we moved off the lane, was the parking problem and constant repairs to car wing mirrors. Some residents have 2 cars parked on there.

Mind on street parking is a major problem every where now

park381 06-10-2008 19:27

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 638645)
Not totally sure, but from memory, and seeing photographs of the park being opened in 1912, the park was there before the houses on Park Lane.;)

Think I would agree with you there, must have seen the same photographs

park381 06-10-2008 19:44

Re: What a shame
 
Is the Rhyddings Park Neighbourhood Watch still in operation, do they still meet in the Stop & Rest ?

Neil 06-10-2008 20:44

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638625)
If you are thinking of adjacent to the kids play area then yes I think you will get some resistance from residents.

What makes you think I would want to put a load of mid teens effin and jeffin next to the little darlings on the swings?

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638625)
Would you not require planning permission or would it be a permissible development.

That's the second time I have heard that term today.


Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638625)
Changing the subject, how is the "light" in the park is it still operating and what effect is it having on vandals if any.

It is still there and operating. It allows them to see what they are breaking.
On a more serious note this summer has been quite good so I would not say it attracts vandals.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638625)
Is there any CCTV coverage in the park.

Yes ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638636)
the Planning Officer in her report to the planning committee in connection with the planning application for the light in the play area, refered to the childrens play area as "the unfortunate siting of the play area". Which indicated that even she was not happy with the location of the play area.

I was not involved with that, it was before my time. I do however think it is an excellent site for the kiddies and would very much like to increase its size as I feel it is now very much undersized for the number of children trying to use it.

I would be interested to know why she thinks it is in the wrong place and where and why she would have placed it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638636)
The height of the lighting column actually installed was only 4M, HBC could have saved the expense of the planning application, since a 4M column did not need planning permission.

Thanks for that info, it might same some money and time if we want to light the new area.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638669)
Is the Rhyddings Park Neighbourhood Watch still in operation, do they still meet in the Stop & Rest ?

Yes it is and yes they do.

Neil 06-10-2008 21:06

Re: What a shame
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 638645)
Not totally sure, but from memory, and seeing photographs of the park being opened in 1912, the park was there before the houses on Park Lane.;)

My house would just have been inside the park when it was first opened so Park Lane was an afterthought as well.

These bits of maps might help

1893

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...shame-1893.jpg

1911

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...shame-1911.jpg

1930

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...shame-1930.jpg

park381 07-10-2008 07:20

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638697)
What makes you think I would want to put a load of mid teens effin and jeffin next to the little darlings on the swings?

I thought they were already there :D


Quote:

That's the second time I have heard that term today.
HBC used that to build/install the play area

Quote:

I would be interested to know why she thinks it is in the wrong place and where and why she would have placed it.

I seem to remember words like "on the brow of a hill"
A level site, which would also have saved HBC some money would have been on the site of the old paddling pool. That was the area talked about by the local councillors before the event.

Neil 07-10-2008 07:32

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638849)
I seem to remember words like "on the brow of a hill"

Strange it is no where near the brow of a hill, the brow would be up near the Shoulder of Mutton ;).

Like I said I think it is now too small and its location allows it to be extended. It is highly visible which is so people in the area can see if there is any trouble happening. As far as I know we don't have any serious problems occur in the area which could be down to location. The old site really was tucked out of the way. If a child fell and hurt them self they could lay on the floor unnoticed for ages.

For a similar reason the youth shelters are never enclosed on all sides. The site of the old tennis/basketball court is very poor as well. No one passes by unless they are going to that area. An injured person could be there for hours.

The bid includes moving pets corner to where the basket ball court is. This would reduce the isolation issue because Pets Corner is a busy area when open. Once locked up at night it would then be a quiet area for the animals.

park381 07-10-2008 08:04

Re: What a shame
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638855)
It is highly visible which is so people in the area can see if there is any trouble happening.

You mean the houses directly in front of the play area, that would be Park Lane I assume. The houses on Fielding Lane do not get a clear view because of the trees. The houses on Malvern Ave have no view of it, neither have the semi's at the far end of Park lane. The houses on Rhyddings street can only see the park gates from their front doors,plus most people would walk past with their eyes closed for fear of reprisals from the yobs at a later date. :D
Quote:

The site of the old tennis/basketball court is very poor as well. No one passes by unless they are going to that area. An injured person could be there for hours.
Who would want to risk going to that area.
Quote:

The bid includes moving pets corner to where the basket ball court is. This would reduce the isolation issue because Pets Corner is a busy area when open. Once locked up at night it would then be a quiet area for the animals.
I would have thought there would be a greater problem with the pets corner if located at the back of the park, you have already indicated above that the tennis/basketball area is poor, so why put the animals at risk in that corner. :confused:

Neil 07-10-2008 08:18

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638876)
You mean the houses directly in front of the play area

Not really referring to just the houses, people walking on those streets may see something though. It's location makes it very visible for other park users. Many people exercise their dogs on the big field. Brave people even enter the park at the end of park Lane or the top of Rhyddings street and risk the bottom path leaving at the Fielding Lane gate as a cut through as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638876)
I would have thought there would be a greater problem with the pets corner if located at the back of the park, you have already indicated above that the tennis/basketball area is poor, so why put the animals at risk in that corner. :confused:

Because we would turn if from one of the least visited areas to one of the most, doing such would remove the problems with its isolated location. The same isolation will be peaceful for the animals after hours.

park381 07-10-2008 08:36

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638881)
Because we would turn if from one of the least visited areas to one of the most, doing such would remove the problems with its isolated location. The same isolation will be peaceful for the animals after hours.

I thought all the problems with the existing pets corner happened at night or after hours, when things were supposed to be "peaceful". So how is moving it over to that back corner of the park going to help, is there not access to that area from the woods adjacent, as in over the wall. Or do you intend to to install floodlights & CCTV to the area

jaysay 07-10-2008 10:11

Re: What a shame
 
If X on the map is our gaffe is that where Dr. Bhat's surgery used to be?

Neil 07-10-2008 10:37

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638890)
I thought all the problems with the existing pets corner happened at night or after hours, when things were supposed to be "peaceful". So how is moving it over to that back corner of the park going to help, is there not access to that area from the woods adjacent, as in over the wall. Or do you intend to to install floodlights & CCTV to the area

We have only had 2 or 3 problems with pets area in the 18 months ish since the Friends took over. I think that is very good considering it is nor fully open to visitors down the path - don't you?

jaysay 07-10-2008 10:47

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 638915)
If X on the map is our gaffe is that where Dr. Bhat's surgery used to be?

I will have to hit these keys on my laptop harder, it should have said your gaffe Neil not our:rolleyes:

park381 07-10-2008 12:06

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638924)
We have only had 2 or 3 problems with pets area in the 18 months ish since the Friends took over. I think that is very good considering it is nor fully open to visitors down the path - don't you?

Fair comment, things must be getting better then, I hope it works out and you get the funding, at least in that back corner the animals won't be able to dig their way out because of the concrete base :D

park381 07-10-2008 12:11

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 638915)
If X on the map is our gaffe is that where Dr. Bhat's surgery used to be?

Coming up Rhyddings street, on the block between Catlow Hall street & Hornby Street - middle of row left hand side.

Neil 07-10-2008 13:08

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638955)
Coming up Rhyddings street, on the block between Catlow Hall street & Hornby Street - middle of row left hand side.

I did not know that.

park381 07-10-2008 13:23

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 638962)
I did not know that.

He was there from moving in to the area and setting up practice, until he moved to the present location.

An excellent Doctor, and a very well respected person.

Lilly 07-10-2008 15:33

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 638969)
He was there from moving in to the area and setting up practice, until he moved to the present location.

An excellent Doctor, and a very well respected person.


Eeeeeh, I remember Dr Bhat's surgery being in a house on Rhyddings Street. I can still picture the waiting room.....funny what you remember, isn't it? :)

jaysay 07-10-2008 16:20

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 639006)
Eeeeeh, I remember Dr Bhat's surgery being in a house on Rhyddings Street. I can still picture the waiting room.....funny what you remember, isn't it? :)

He's been my Dr since I moved back to Ossy 22 years ago, he's never let me down and has never refused to make a house call, still has the same receptionist has he had in 1986

MargaretR 07-10-2008 16:29

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 639028)
and has never refused to make a house call

Isn't that the doc who has his surgery a few feet from your front door?

jaysay 08-10-2008 09:49

Re: What a shame
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 639033)
Isn't that the doc who has his surgery a few feet from your front door?

and your point Margaret, this day and age its hard work to get some doctors to do home visits anywhere


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com