Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Questions and Answers (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f66/)
-   -   What For! (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f66/what-for-12434.html)

staggeringman 22-06-2005 18:04

What For!
 
1 Attachment(s)
was going to take a picture of something other than these rings that are on the inside of the walls of the bridge but curiosity got the better of me,does anyone know why and what they where used for?
and a pint for who can tell me where the bridge is.
p.s the bird i was going to take a photo of on the river bank had got dr..ooopps i mean flown off.....lol

simon 22-06-2005 18:12

Re: What For!
 
Garinda uses them at weekend.......

If that helps????

staggeringman 22-06-2005 18:16

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by simon
Garinda uses them at weekend.......

If that helps????

wondered where he was going at the weekends....lmao.

cashman 22-06-2005 18:27

Re: What For!
 
think they were to tie the wives to in the old days,while the husband went for a pint.

staggeringman 22-06-2005 23:59

Re: What For!
 
does nobody want a pint take a good hard look at it its easy!

Doug 23-06-2005 00:22

Re: What For!
 
I think their what Garinda would tie is ow’d horse too?

staggeringman 23-06-2005 00:59

Re: What For!
 
garinda is not that unsophisticated (do i get 10 ackers for the spelling roy)garinda would have his horse where he could look after it.

WillowTheWhisp 23-06-2005 07:01

Re: What For!
 
If it's a canal bridge it could have been for bargees to tie the horse to while they did that foot walking along the inside of the bridge thing (forget what they called it) and then collect the horse when they got through and off they'd go again.

rincewind 23-06-2005 11:29

Re: What For!
 
is it clitheroe stagger?


and i think the rings are for village idiots...............to keep them from joining local government.

staggeringman 23-06-2005 18:09

Re: What For!
 
yes it is at clitheroe quite a lot of bridges there though!

mel3ft 28-06-2005 21:59

Re: What For!
 
i remember that Its at mitton the bridge just before the aspinall arms ( i think ) i been there before as a bambeno we u dad am i right ?

and them rings i think ud use themto tie me up when im bein a pain :p

harwood red 28-06-2005 22:55

Re: What For!
 
come on staggers, let us out of our misery!!

jpest1 29-06-2005 00:01

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp
If it's a canal bridge it could have been for bargees to tie the horse to while they did that foot walking along the inside of the bridge thing (forget what they called it) and then collect the horse when they got through and off they'd go again.

You are right willow. They were for tying horses to (not garinda) and the barges were pushed through with the feet. You were very close in what you said. It was called 'Footing'

staggeringman 29-06-2005 01:18

Re: What For!
 
sorry only two half right,rincewind and 3ft. yes it is at clithroe and its on the way past mitton ,the church is in the background.the rings still dont know about?

P.S they cant be for horse drawn boats not on the ribble?

Doug 29-06-2005 11:08

Re: What For!
 
Two thoughts for your consideration Staggers……..

Are they for tying off nets? Maybe at a time when the mighty but graceful Salmon roamed the sea’s and retuning to the Jewel of the Ribble.

OK, how about for roping off the bridge for penning animals on Market day.

Less 29-06-2005 11:34

Re: What For!
 
There used to be alot of poaching in that area at the beginning of the 20th century, after all you could feed a family of eight quite easily through the winter if you managed to 'rustle' a good size bridge. So to prevent this theft the land-owner used to tie the bridge down in the evening so he could sleep peacefully through the night knowing the bridge would still be there in the morning.


Or as this picture demonstrates it was for an early form of bungy jumping!

Bazf 29-06-2005 14:42

Re: What For!
 
Actually I have to respond to the last post as I find anyone who upholds the poaching of bridges as a good thing, yes you could feed a very large family on one good bridge but my Grandfather, god rest his soul, was an ex Bridgerdier in the WW1 and when he came out he got a job with LCC as Bridge keeper to Lord Frodshum of Eccleston and his job was to ensure that all poachers were brought before his Lordship where they would get a good whipping and deported to Yorkshire. One night he heard a comotion and a lot of swearing on Sally's bridge in Wycoller he crept up slowly and doing a tiger crawl that he had learnt in the Army he got close enough to hear them talking "aye shes a big lass" said one of them "thall never be able to trap it" said the other " Just watch me I bet she's a righty bloody tiger with a couple of drinks" That was enough for my Grandfather he was on them in a blink of an eye," Your under arrest for trying to Poach this bridge" said my Grandfather "Bloody hell your a loony" said one of the men but my grandfather would not be put off with mere words " get yerselves to his Lordships and may god have mercy on you" My Grandfather was not one to be trifled with and marched them to Lord Frodshum's who deported them to Yorkshire where they would spend the rest of thier lives trying to escape that god awful accent.
So please don't trivialize Bridge poaching as there are people in Yorkshire still trying to escape and my Grandfather put the there.

WillowTheWhisp 29-06-2005 14:49

Re: What For!
 
If that bridge is th one near the Aspinall Ams it'sactually in no man's land so as it something to do with tolls?

staggeringman 29-06-2005 17:08

Re: What For!
 
what do you mean willow in no mans land?i can think of only three bridges that are in clithroe, eddisford bridge, mitton bridge and one near the cement works.

chav1 06-07-2005 07:58

Re: What For!
 
the rings are actualy gypies earings that were torn from gypsie ears and hung off bridges as a warning to other gypsies that were thinking of entering the village

staggeringman 08-07-2005 18:03

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jpest1
You are right willow. They were for tying horses to (not garinda) and the barges were pushed through with the feet. You were very close in what you said. It was called 'Footing'

dont think the river was deep enough for barges?

WillowTheWhisp 08-07-2005 18:34

Re: What For!
 
That was when I thought it might have been a canal but certainly not on the river.

Is it horsey at all?

staggeringman 08-07-2005 19:51

Re: What For!
 
there are four rings two on oneside and directley across from them there are two more :confused: its baffled me....lol

apest1 08-07-2005 20:01

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by staggeringman
yes it is at clitheroe quite a lot of bridges there though!

is this still going or is it to late (look at the dates)
i must read all the posts befor i do a post

slap me !!!

tell you tomorrow im going tomitton in the morning......

staggeringman 09-07-2005 02:11

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by apest1
is this still going or is it to late (look at the dates)
i must read all the posts befor i do a post

slap me !!!

tell you tomorrow im going tomitton in the morning......

what the cufk are you on about apest1.

apest1 09-07-2005 17:12

Re: What For!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by staggeringman
what the cufk are you on about apest1.

frist time i looked the dates was 22/23-6-2005..up to the 29/6/05 (it was the 8/7/05 when i put my thing on) then found page 2.....
WELL me and my littel girl sen`t 2 hrs at mitton this morning AND now one Knows what there for , so if you can keep it going till monday . i wiill go to stoneyherst col and see if thay can put some light on it... ONE thing i did fined is that mitton was called mytton till 1893 and the church !!!!!! well just go and see it ... (sorry for the mix up staggers) :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com