![]() |
Panopticon set to get green light
Just to cheer up 'all our yesterdays crowd', Cabinet are to give the Panopticon project the green light next week as outlined in a two page report.
Quote:
So what is it that makes you want to insult me, my opinions? Do you want me stop expressing an opinion? Or just leave Accy Web altogether? There are other residents on here who have a similar view to me so should I stop having that view because I stood for election? Is my view an unacceptable view? Whats the point, or what fun is there, of visiting Accy Web when so many people feel at ease running other people down personally? Please study the quote below and consider that with the bully boy answer you wrote? |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
Please don't give up coming on to the site as I think a lot of us have learnt more about the inner workings of the council because of you than we would have known about without. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
While I am saddened that the Panopticon is set to get the green light........I think I always knew it would. I feel the consultation was just a paper execise.
Graham, on the other point that you make.......I don't think you should stop coming onto Accyweb.......it is always good to get another viewpoint........I may not agree with your point of view, but you are still entitled to have it. I have learned a lot from the information you have posted and that can't be a bad thing. I also get the feeling that you are passionate about your local politics. To your own self be true! |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
Heres a quick rundown on what has happened. cabinet will make the decison. Thats 7 Tories as elected by majority by the people. The Council is the cabinet and the Cabinet is Tory. Labour Councillors ARE NOT the Council, they are the official opposition. There have been 5 seperate resident meetings to my knowledge and no more. FoAH, Peel & Barnfield Area Council, Huncoat Area Council, Civic Trust and MPA Public Meeting. All the residents there have voted in overwhelmingly in favour. Probably 95:5 if not higher. The no voters are a myth. We knocked on 4000 voters doors and the Panopiticons never came up once. Most strange if you read Accy Web!!!! Its not local money. Its outside money. FoAH [Thats residents and myself] have done the backbone of work to determine whether it was worth it or not and that work has been taken and is the core of the report. Cabinet itself has done little over 18 months so the debate has been poor/uninformed. The majority of the cabinet are in favour and seeing as PB has seen the Tories slide electorally he has less room for manouevre against cabinet members in favour. PB has used it as a poitical football as well to attack Labour rather than investigate and conclude the best for the people of Hyndburn. The Pals never used the trenches. They were there in the 40's to stop Jerry landings by plane and for soldiers to train. So I am stold back in 1914 it was Accy Golf Club, you can still see what appears to be the greens for Golf from higher up. There is nothing natural about the type of ecology there, eg the horrible conifer plantation. Decidous woodland and pasture grasses exist at higher altitude only a few hundred yards away. However what is there now is spolit by a grafiti covered shelter and worn monument, all accessed by ad hoc paths which are eroding the site. Some of the early schemes would have removed that shelter. The cabinet has promised itself to unlock funding for the coppice. We shall see. Funding is there and I would expect it around £300k plus Remade over 5 years. Remade have said No Panopticon no funding. Panopticon and the remade programme strats 2006. They are taking lead from the Regional Park who now have only £600k left from £5m as they have only 18 months to run. The Regional Park £5m was only got on the promise that investment would attract outside visitors money, ie part of a economic regeneration plan and path improvments alone did cut the mustard and hence the £5m bid would have failed. Anyway it is now the Coppice Project and the Panopticon itself is barely mentioned. I believe public opinion has swung Conservative thinking in favour.Possibly again another reflection of the wider held view of the public rather than the lobbyists who over played their importance and lost ground by narrowing their arguments to their own agenda rather than take on board some of the things said by those in favour. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Graham...you may have knocked on doors.....I didn't see anyone from any of the political persuasions......and it was not because I was out........I am retired. I was hoping for a chance to discuss local issues including the panopticon.
You, yourself sound a bit dubious about funding for the upkeep of the pathways (we shall see). |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
As you may know I work with your mate Kev and from what he has told me the one thing you are not is a quitter. In another thread I offered apologies to you because I thought I had gone to far but reading Staggeringmans comments maybe he's the one who should be retracting his statement.
As you are to the left on politics I will never totally agree with you but I'm always open to debate and if someone gives a good arguement I will change my opinion as I have with the Panopticon. At first I was totally against it but now I'm half way, I would prefer another site and I hate the design that we are being shown but I can see that funding is needed and if it means a silly ring of circles then so be it. Staggeringman I think you are well out of order, verging on bully boy tactics !!! |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
I totally agree with you about the hideous conifers. It's a pity we couldn't have had a vote on them before they were planted and then possibly people who understood the natural flora of the area could have raised their objections and possibly prevented the planting, but then again maybe it would have just gone ahead any way. I think the shelter should stay and be improved because the way the weather is around here that's the most useful thing up there. Quote:
Quote:
It doesn't ssurprise me that the subject never came up when canvassing door to door. When I've mentioned the panopticon to people a lot have looked blank and said "what?" or "what's a panopticon?" Incidentally no-one came round here either. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Graham, I, like Margaret P. enjoy reading your points of view on the accyweb and should you ever decide to stop your input, it would make the accyweb that much poorer.......HOWEVER! You say: "But nothing gets learnt from people who have a closed mind, fixed agenda and who cant handle others opinion."
This is certainly true but bear in mind that YOU have made sweeping statements about the politics of Accywebbers in general! It is your privilege as an individual to argue on-line with another member...but to paint all and sundry with the same brush is sure to antagonise. I totally agree with Staggeringman in that the Panopticon should not be put on the coppice nor anywhere else. You say: "Its not local money. Its outside money" and that is my argument! I care not for your politics, you are outside my influence BUT I detest quango's that spend £millions of pounds throughout the country (and YES, it IS our money!) and pocket vast fortunes into their own pockets for doing so. Quango's are made up of wealthy egotistical prats that are urged to find reasons to squander vast sums of money on useless projects and try to convince locals that they are SO lucky to have this project thrust upon them! You also say: "We knocked on 4000 voters doors and the Panopiticons never came up once. Most strange if you read Accy Web!!!!".....not strange at all considering the ratio of Accywebbers to the population of Hyndburn, and perhaps the population in general are more worried about loutish behaviour, lack of medical treatment on the N.H.S, and other general issues. Just because the Panopticon is not on their "crucial" worry list, It does not automatically give it the "green light" One more comment from you, : "However what is there now is spolit by a grafiti covered shelter and worn monument, all accessed by ad hoc paths which are eroding the site. Some of the early schemes would have removed that shelter." Can YOU or anyone else guarantee that finance will be found for the upkeep and security of the Panopticon? Of course not! What ever is put there will be ruined within just a few years. THIS is why locals (and most accy webbers) object to our money being spent! |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
"Speed is not as important as the direction in which you travel" Before we set off at full-tilt lets be sure we know where we're heading and that it's really where we want to go. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
not in favour of panoptican ideas that have been given so far,at the same time not against it.think you should remain on accy web,aint got you down as a quitter. i don't think i run you down,maybe you do,i run your opinions down if i don't agree thats nowt personal an i would hope you see it like that,i also praise opinions if i agree. thats nowt personal either,iv'e only met about 3 people on accy web so its not a colusion of any sort,i'm not a god,but i call a spade a spade. not always correct-but who is?think when people can't give opinions were in the old soviet union.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
Having met the majority of local Accywebbers, I can't think of one that is likely to find the time to go to the coppice with vandalism in mind. Perhaps you could indicate which villains-to-be you are thinking of? |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
[QUOTE=Graham Jones]
. We knocked on 4000 voters doors and the Panopiticons never came up once. Most strange if you read Accy Web!!!! I think you`ll find that on Gayle Knights last posting before the election she said that debate on the panopticon was being put on the back burner because it was`nt an election issue. Next thing we hear, the project has ben passed!! ] |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
1 Attachment(s)
What about this ?
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
lol
to be honest my mind is been put at rest in the knowledge that todays younger generation will soon destroy anything put on the coppice hell if i see them doing it and they scarper off i will call them back and tell them to continue :) |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
[QUOTE=Uncle Mick]
Quote:
I think that's why the general feeling is that it will get the green light - it hasn't yet and could still be turned down by the cabinet. Also, it has not got planning permission so still has to be approved at that stage. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
The point is that we already have two things on the Coppice that have been well and truly vandalised so what makes anybody think that a new panopticon would be any different? The vandals will be in their element with something new to have a go at.
Personally I don't want to see High Form or Tellytubby land up there but I wouldn't actually waste my energy vandalising it. There are plenty of bikers and off roaders who have probably never so much as heard of AccyWeb who would simply see humps and bumps as a new playground challenge. Don't you see that Purplelass? I agree 100% with what cashman says about being able to disagree with a person's opinion and yet still wanting them to voice that opinion. We'd all hate to be told what to think, wouldn't we? There are people in my life who I like very much and yet can totally disagree with their views on some topics. It doesn't make me like them any less. We should all be able to make the distinction between the person as an individual and their opinion on one or more topics. It's called being adult. Children fall out because they disagree on minor issues but adults should be able to behave more sensibly. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
[QUOTE=Gayle Knight Anyway, the general mood is now that certain Councillors who were saying no, no, no to the scheme have now decided to support it if it can be classed as a Coppice redevelopment scheme and the emphasis taken off the Panopticon.
[/QUOTE] The emporers new clothes then... |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Coppice redevelopment scheme
so basicly its a classic case of a different name but the same old crap..? |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
NOT EVERYONE GOES ON YOUR THREADS GRAHAM some are the silent few, but do have OPINIONS, please stop trying to upset everyone //// i for one am NOT impressed/
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
You are one of the silent majority of responsible people Roy. I know I didn't word it very well but what I meant was that there are always enough irresponsible people out there who would see it as a challenge just in the same way as those who spray painted the memorial and vandalised the shelter. If everyone respected the environment we wouldn't have half the problems that we do, but how do we educate the irresponsible people into having the same sort of attitude? The few who do these things spoil it for the rest of us. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
[QUOTE=Gayle Knight]
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
What would "Coppice Redevelopment" entail? I do agree that we could do with a bit of redevelopment up there such as cleaning up of the graffitti and mending the vandalism, making the paths better etc. It's a pity about the trees but I don't suppose after all this time that much can be done about those.
Such a pity that we'll be away at the end of May because I'm dying to hear what will have been discussed and the conclusions that have been reached then. (I know that sentence is grammatically all to pot but it's late and I'm tired so I hope it makes enough sense.) |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
I agree with the suggestion by Purple Lass and WillowtheWhisp? who are suggesting that problems of housing, poverty, economy are more important. I did not agree with the sidelining of the Councils Budget in March for debate on this project, though some posters disagreed at the time.
However some things act as a statement, a catalyst for regneration and whether this will who knows. When I asked there had been little research on this. It is interesting that Gayle suggests it was shelved for the election. Presumedly because it was devisive and a potential vote loser and not a vote winner either way. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
The more I read of this act of perfidious folly the more I am appalled. Is this to become Accy's Iraq? Is the council about to pursue a policy, against huge public opposition, involving large expenditure of resources, ignoring far greater priorities, with little opposition or debate, on the basis of false or suspect documentation, such as the dossier dated 9th May, as quoted above yesterday by Councillor Jones.
Unfortunatly, today is 9th May. What is going on here? Could someone please expain on what basis local political debate was suspended for the duration of the election campaign? We elect councillors to do their job as councillors, not to go hanging on the the coat tails of their two-bit parliamentary candidate as they do their once-every-four-years rounds. Not that it has been resumed, we are suddenly finding that "Over-my-dead-body" Britcliffe and his mob have turned and this loonatic scheme is going ahead. What has been going on behind closed doors? What have we not been told? It looks like the people of Hyndburn are about to get a first-degree stitch up. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
red lights green lights making me dizzy lol
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
I think the green light came before the red light and, looking at the red light, it now seems more like an amber light.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
told you it made me dizzy lol
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
AccyWeb is not a political party or organised club. It is a group of widely varied individuals who have simply come together from all walks of life to air their views and discuss topics of interest regarding the Hyndburn area as well as other non-related matters. No one person can or does speak on behalf of anyone else. Busman can therefor no more guarantee the actions of other AccyWeb members than you can. Incidentally, who says that all or indeed any members of AccyWeb are respectable? ;) |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Ho Ho Ho...........it looks like the good people of Haslingden are about to get an early Christmas present from their northern neighbours in Accy. Yep....they've gone and got themselves a Panopticon, namely the Flying Saucer variant so resoundly given the boot by HBC earlier this year. I'm sure we'll all miss what we never had, don't you?:D
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Pity it found a home it could have come up here to Bonnybridge they are into flying saucers.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Yep, it's true! It's being built at Top O'Slate in Haslingden.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Seems like this idea is a bit of a Jonah and nobody wants it.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
The Council and the majority of the locals are very much behind it! |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Not getting drawn into this Tealeaf
It's out of Hyndburn, it's all been done legitimately, they have had a lot of consultation but it's impossible to force people to read stuff they're not interested in, the Council is fully behind it and supportive. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Its away from Accy so thats all that matters.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
It's also the UFO isn't it? So they're welcome to it.
Hasn't the artist come up with any better ideas for Accy yet? Or even better haven't we got an alternative artist? Is the FP still on sale? Must have a look at that. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Quote:
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
There isnt one its not exactly high on the list of things to do at the moment.
|
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
Respectable members of this message board may not like the idea of "HighForm" but if it was thrust upon us we aren't really the vandalising type. We'd moan about it being vandalised by others and ending up a total eyesore. Look at the current state of the monument. That hasn't been done by respectable Accywebbers. It's been done by vandals.
I think we'd probably welcome something tasteful and vandalproof - but is there any such thing? I'm now wondering how long it will be before the Spaceship of Rossendale suffers the same ignominious fate. |
Re: Panopticon set to get green light
There's a thing, now I recall. Is there any word on the oceans of development cash that these things were supposed to attract to the area?Has Rossendale seen an upsurge in tourism and job creation yet? Are the glitterati abandoning places like Milan and Bilbao and making a bee-line for Rossendale yet?
Or were we right to say "NOT IN OUR BACKYARD"? The Council may very well be behind the Panopticon, but we seasoned residents of Hyndburn are all too familiar with the enthusiasms of local councils and, sadly, what they inevitably lead to. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com