Re: 9/11
 

Of course 9/11 never happened really. It's all an American conspiracy to get everyone in the western world to hate muslims. GWB had Hollywood mock up the plane crashes and then he commissioned magician David Copperfield to make the twin towers disappear. They're still there really, just can't be seen. Everybody's in there going about their business.:rolleyes:

Re: 9/11
 

maybe the pentagon was not shown as much because very few died compared to the hundreds who died in the twin towers

i know it sounds crude but the news companies wouldnt be able to carry the story for the weeks which they did if they just focused on the pentagons death toll but because of the huge amount of deaths at the twin towers the news companies had many more story to run and many more witnesses than would be true of the pentagon therefore this gives greater impact to the watching public and then they news companies receive higher viewing figures! cause face it how many of you sat there on 9/11 and watched the news in shock for the evening,

Re: 9/11
 

Well said John, you may well be right!:p Check out the WASHINGTON TIMES!

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing
serious doubts about the collapse of the WorldTradeCenter on 9-11.



Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at
the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor
emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three
steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling."
Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate
the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of
the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either.

The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

I don't think I believe in these conspiracy stories - - but obviously, a lot of Americans DO!

Re: 9/11
 

Yeah 1.:rolleyes:

Re: 9/11
 

Re: 9/11
 

We all saw the planes fly into the towers, come on, let's not start disputing that. I suppose if it was possible to bring down the towers in a controlled demolition collapsing in on themselves as they did, that would be preferable to them falling over their whole length and bringing down God knows how many buildings with them and perhaps killing thousands more people. However, there was certainly not enough time for some demolition crew to come in, plan the charge locations, set the charges and bring down the buildings. So, the only way this could have been accomplished, as far as I can see, was if the charges were put in when the building was constructed in order to facilitate such demolition. Does anyone seriously consider we are constructing buildings with built in charges?

Re: 9/11
 

where are we going with this thread? some should be maybe reading aesops fables.lol

Re: 9/11
 

just so you guys know the moon landing was fake

got to be honest i actualy believe it was staged :D