![]() |
Re: Cruise Control
Servicing does make a difference entwisi, the vans at work lose economy if they are not serviced regularly, monday morning ritual for us is oil, water and tyre pressures, and report of any faults, it is expensive to keep on top of, but cheaper than the consequences of ignorance, cruise control (as this is what the thread is about) is the most economical way to travel distances, but you should make passengers aware of how to deactivate it, and I for one applaud busman for having the consideration for his dear wife to explain it to willow.
|
Re: Cruise Control
I would disagree that Cruise is teh most economincal though. The cars tend to 'over' accelerate to keep the speed, also going up hill you can let a car drop 5 or so mph without any loss in time but a considerable saving on fuel, Cruise will keep teh speed irrespective of how hard it has to accelerate.
I remember a friend and I driving to see my Sister in Nice on teh cheap. We used to drive in bare feet as it was amazing just how much extra 'feel' it gave you on how much you were using the accelerator(although free wheeling with teh engine switched off down teh alps maybe wasn't that good an idea especially when you get pulled for speeding through a tiny village but thats another story! :D ) Actually people like BUsman can be a godsend to fuel economy! Sitting in the slipstream of a coach/wagon saves a load!!!!! :D |
Re: Cruise Control
Well I have to agree with what both Derek and Entwisi have just said, if you look after your motor and don't abuse it, its to your own advantage. It certainly applies to work vehicles, when I was on the road, I travelled the length and breadth of the country and your vehicle was a valuable part of a three man team, if your motor breaks down your stuffed
|
Re: Cruise Control
Had a few cars with cruise, can’t say I ever felt comfy using it. Given the option I would bin it.
|
Re: Cruise Control
Quote:
You will be used to being that close as a mad biker :p |
Re: Cruise Control
mad? Maybe... Biker yes!
|
Re: Cruise Control
I have “cruise control”.
It’s called my right foot and my brain. |
Re: Cruise Control
heh I've been on teh bike for a few days and done some testing( I can 'feel' when I'm in teh slipstream better)
behind a transit, turbulence starts about 25-30 feet behind teh van. closer than 25ft and I was definately in the quiet zone and could roll off the throttle and still maintain teh same speed. behind a car( all except MPVs) there was negilgable slipstream up to 10 foot, i didn't want to go closer than that :D behind a coach the 'bad zone' was about 35-40 foot back, anywhere closer was definately quiet and clean air. |
Re: Cruise Control
Quote:
I would expect to would need to be closer to something smaller. I would also expect you to be a lot closer in a car like I said before, way to close for comfort. |
Re: Cruise Control
you clearly aren't comitted to teh cause or you would have tried it yourself :D
tbh people forget that on a bike we can move to teh side and go down teh side between two lines of cars quite easily. we might sit close on your tail but its usually on teh back quarter so its only a quick wiggle and theres nowt in front of us. :D |
Re: Cruise Control
Having just had a go in a car with cruise control I found it a bit worrying about taking foot off both pedals but after a while got used to it. Would only use it on long motorway runs though and would consider it helpful if doing regular long distance runs on the motorways. :dflam:
|
Re: Cruise Control
Quote:
I used to be an idiot, I got better and am now quite a chilled out driver. |
Re: Cruise Control
Quote:
|
Re: Cruise Control
Quote:
"If you can read this your to bloody close":D:p |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com