![]() |
The fashionable substitute for belief
I was a little perplexed to read the other day that St. Bartholomews Church in Snuffy Errod held a flower festival last week.
Nothing strange in that, I hear you say, and ordinarily I would agree with you. Were it not for the fact that among the Aisle displays of horticultural dexterity which interpreted the works of C.S.Lewis (Narnia) Paul Bunyan (Pilgrims Progress) and Dickens (Christmas Carol) was an entry celebrating the work of that well known son of the church Oscar Wilde. Yes, that's right, the same chap who was condemned to two years imprisonment with hard labour for having the temerity to be honest in public about his emotions. The same chap who was, no doubt, condemned from the pulpit in the very same church where this tribute stood. How times change Two films, A west end Musical and more biographies than you can shake a stick at, every word still in print a century after your death. Pace Oscar, you will never be forgotten. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Mabe society is like the humble daisy opening and closing depending on the season light and warmth. We came out of the dark into the light but soon could be back in the dark again.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Maybe, Spuggie, Maybe. But not if I have anything to do with it!
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Oscar Wilde was his own worst enemy. If he hadn't taken the bait and took the Marquis of Queensberry to court for leaving a note at his club, which was addressed to Oscar Wilde posing as a sodomite [sic], he would have been able to carry on with his life untouched and feted by a society that worshipped success. The same couldn't be said for the ordinary people who had a similar orientation but who were regularly gaoled, and before that hung for the same 'crime'.
Was the display made up of green carnations? |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
I don't honestly know, I only read about it. But it would be nice to think that it was.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Oscar Wilde wrote some really beautiful stories. I dare bet there are many people who love the stories and haven't a clue about the life of the man who wrote them in spite of films, biographies and a West End musical. The depths of ignorance in the general public never ceases to amaze me. There are people out there who actually confuse him with George Bernard Shaw!
Just a thought off on a tangent here - if a murderer wrote a wonderful children's story would the fact of his crime diminish the quality of the tale? |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Interesting dilemma. But wasn't there a case in the papers recently that touched on this very subject???
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Lewis Carrol was a man of dubious morals, but it doesn't diminish from his skill as a writer of great children's books.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
I now have to admit my ignorance that I don't actually know a thing about Lewis Carrol but I do love the Narnia stories.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Apparently his interest in Alice Liddell, the model for Alice through the Looking Glass, was rather a strange one, and so were the photographs he took of her posed semi naked.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Quote:
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Quote:
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
No one knows. They are quite ethereal, but by today's way of thinking rather odd to say the least.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Lewis Carrol was certainly an oddity. His relationship with the Liddel Family was equally odd. This much was recognised by Mrs Liddel who actually forbade Dodgson (Carrol) from seing her daughters, though this was after the publication of Alice in Wonderland. To know what Mrs Liddel made of Dodgsons behaviour, one would have to think like a Victorian upper middle-class matron.
The Victorian moral landscape is complex and often contradictory. What was unacceptable in public was often de-riguer in private life and their attitudes towards the expression of both sexuality and the emotions was so far removed from what we now expect as the norm as to make analysis and understanding nigh on impossible. Similarly their attitude towards, and the values they placed on, children was often shockingly different to to our own. Did Dodgson harbour peadophilliac fantasies about Alice? Did he ever act out those fantasies? We will probably never know, since his neice edited and excised large portions of his diaries after his death. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Just before I had to leave I was reading something online from the TLS and had a link all ready to post but then we were ready to go so I never got round to it! Check it out here
I had just finished reading the interesting fact that in those days a girl of 12 was considered to be of marriagable age. Have you actually seen the photos Rindy? |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Yes Willow, not on line it was in the Sunday Times magazine years ago, but they must be still out there.
She was half dressed and draped in chiffon with a little posy of flowers and a garland. If someone took photographs of my neice like that, even if he was a Reverend, I'd be straight on the phone to the police. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Sounds a bit like the image of a dryad or something like that from Narnia. Maybe that was what he was trying to capture. As A-b says it's difficult for us to understand what went on in those days when on the surface all was supposed to be so prim and proper but a girl of 12 was regarded as marriageable.
Was he courting Alice's sister or was he meeting the girls as an excuse to chat up one of the servants? Would such an age gap have been acceptable in Victorian society? Was it better to remain an old maid or to marry an old dodderer? |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
She looked about six at the time, and although she was posed artfully in a garden and a studio, she was semi naked, with her bottom half drapen in transparent chiffon.
By today's standards they would be unacceptable. They make the sick American child beauty pagents look tame.:( |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Quote:
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
I bet they weren't considered iffy by Victorian society. Probably in a similar vein to the naked baby in a tin bath ones. (Yikes there's one of me like that somewhere! - in a tin bath I mean!)
I've been looking at some of his photos and they vary from normal boring family portraits to others of a more artistic nature. What I did find interesting in my reading however was a comment that once they were past a certain age his "special friendship" with children fizzled out. Now who does that remind you of? |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
No even by Victorian standards apparently, eyebrows were raised about the sensuality of the photograhs and his obsession with the child, which as you said ceased when she reached puberty.
These weren't innocent 'kid on a rug' photographs that most of us had to endure, and are brought out to tease us later, they are as disturbing as the sexualisation of the American child beauty contests, were girls aged as young as three are made up to look like grown women and paraded in bathing suits. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Oh right, different kettle of fish then.
Those child beauty pageants are so sick. But his friendship with the family continued for a while after Alice was 6 didn't it? Wasn't she about 12 when those pages were written which are no longer there? I love mysteries. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
If you do a search on Google images for Alice Liddell, it does bring up some of the photograhs but not the mose provocative ones.
I worked on the film 'Dreamchild', with Coral Brown playing the part of the adult Alice Liddell. She certainly had an interesting and colourful life. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Oh you knew Coral Browne! I absolutely adored her hubby, especially his voice. (friends of a friend of mine)
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Well l dressed her, she wasn't a friend........more of her skivvy, though she was very nice and I loved her in 'The Killing of Sister George.'
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Funnily enough, she sat for another set of photographs by Dodgson when she was in her early twenties (1870), very prim and proper. She also sat for Julia Margaret Cameron.
Interesting thread wander, but this thread was originally about dear Oscar. |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Blimey who needs the web when a-bob is on hand. Got to hand it to you thats some going.
|
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Quote:
A spray of green carnations, perhaps a copy of De Profundis draped in a bit of lavender silk in a Church window= change in attitudes. End of.:) He was dearer to me than you though. I have vivid recollections of meeting him in a house of ill repute whilst I was delivering a telegram. Or perhaps my pills need changing again. ;) |
Re: The fashionable substitute for belief
Meeting who? Oscar Wilde? You're looking well for your age Rindy.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com