![]() |
7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Of course it should go without saying that the Law must be obeyed, but can it be right that the Law should imprison a seventy three year old woman for refusing to pay council tax arrears of £53.71?
Due to the idiotic way that the prison service is currently run Sylvia Hardy will only serve three and a half days of her seven day sentence. The cost of her stay as an unwilling guest of Her Majesty will be £336, roughly six times what she owes. Add to that the cost of the prosecution and you have to ask whether this is fair and reasonable. What do members think: Is Sylvia Hardy a heroine who is bravely standing up for downtrodden pensioners, or a silly, stubborn old woman who should pay up and shut up? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...799327,00.html |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
I admire her.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
If the Law is breached against the state, establishment or any layer of government the miscreant will always be dealt with severely. Law breaches against the individual, unless they happen to be against the ruling classes will warrant unprecedented leniency.
If Sylvia Hardy had refused to pay a trader she would not be in prison. In fact I doubt if any of us would have heard about it. The fact that the court stated that she should not be considered a heroine for making a stand is just a pathetic attempt to stop the idea from spreading. In my book she is a heroine and the Law is a complete and utter ASS! |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Whilst I agree with her principles you must be careful of the message that you give. Whether the rise in her CT was right or wrong it was legally applied and such she is breaking the law. If we were to say don't charge anyone who steals less than £50 the shoplifters would have a field day. She i s making a stand and by doing this is raising the profile of the unfair rises. However the profile was raised by her being brought to court. Did she need to go through with it and actually go to court? As it stands it is the good old taxpayer who is paying for her to be put in prison. That money could have quite simply have gone to better use. We moan at the gov for not spending enough on teh NHS yet we seem to be condoning someone wasting it.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
I also admire this lady's stance but it is a difficult situation as they can't allow people to just refuse to pay. Why don't they just take the money in small installments direct from any benefits she receives eg. pension. I know we do this when someone defaults on their rent so why not for council tax???
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
i feel if u dont pay then you should go to prison or they will continue never paying and it will keep getting higher and higher.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
i thinks she is right to do what she has done , most council tax raises are usualy due to the previous years incompitant spending of the idiots at the town halls
only pitty is it wont change a thing she will still owe the money when she gets out but good on her for trying |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
It isn't really about the money, it costs far more to imprison people for crimes were there is no finances involved.
It always fascinates me the difference between freedom figters and terrorists. French resistance = goodies, IRA = badies, yet both were defending their countries from foreign invaders. Mrs Pankhurst broke the law, she did the crime and paid the price. I admire her stance, but think she could have achieved her goal without actually going to prison. Where will it end? In the 80's people witheld some of their taxes because they didn't want nuclear missiles paid for by their taxes. |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
in the 80's we had poll tax riots although in the long run we still ended up getting screwed
she made the mistake of refusing to pay plenty of layabouts who say the will try to pay and owe thousands to the council tax but realy have no intention of doing so wouldnt it be typical if in good old council style fashion they realise they have messed up on her claim and they actualy owe her money i wonder if anyone would go to jail for that people who defend the couciltax/poll tax seem to forget that berfore thatcher introduced this tax a much cheaper system was in place but i wasnt 18 then but i think it was about £100 a year per household can somone help me out here lol was it called rates or somthing |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
well i admire the woman, its alright for someone to burgal your house,or beat you up the chances are if this is a first offence they will either get community service or get tagged. whilst the law is sacrosant- it is a complete ass,to give the message that a old women who has never been in trouble in her life is WORSE that these people.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
wasnt it only last week an elderly gentlman went to prison over council tax it showed him getting carted away to prison on itv news
seems like the old folk are having thier own revolution and good on them for standing up for what they believe in many of our elderly have lived through much harder times than us and have every right after years of paying taxes to stand up and say enough is enough |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
You know there was a lot less trouble in the middle ages when the Lord of the manor made the rules and just flogged the peasants, I say burn her at the stake and make an example of her.
|
Well she did break the law.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
I admire the woman....she is standing up for her principles....her pension has not gone up in line with the price rises of the Council tax...and she actually could pay the money, and other people have offered to pay the money for her....but she wants to go to prison to prove a point. The point is that the council tax is an unfair tax that doesn't take into account the ABILITY to pay. Local income tax would be fairer.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
It is something that I could see myself doing.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Apparently she is being released early according to BBC News
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Quote:
What does puzzle me is the use of the criminal, as against the civil law, in dealing with cases such as this. It should be a simple matter of sending round the bailiffs & recovering the neccessary assets...in fact, I can see no reason why it sstill can't be done. Would'nt it be nice to see the arrogant bint return from H.M.Prison to see her front door through & a chit from the lads acknowledging pocession of her colour TV and priceless record collection? Lovely stuff. |
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
could have been a lot worse!what if she had been sent to blackpool for a week?
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
This lady had the balls to stand up for what she beleived in and if some thing came of it that benifited all the would we be so quick to condem her? No council could justify some of the rises in council tax especially when they are cutting back and out sourcing work its just a con. At most it should go up with inflation and if councils gave up their madcap ideas and used some fiscal commen sense people would be happy. How much are councilers average rise for their "wage"? :(
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
I was interested to read earlier today that Sylvia Hardy is complaining bitterly that her prison sentence has been ended earlier than intended because some good samaritan paid her arrears. Apparently the warders of the prison where she was confined are dismayed to learn that she intends to continue her protest by refusing to pay the current council tax demand in full. For the short time she was incarcerated she did nothing but complain; about the beds, the pillows, the food, the other inmates. Eventually it was felt necessary to explain to her that she was in prison, not a holiday camp.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
I disagree with her being released. The prison sentance was for not paying. She did not pay so should do the time. Would the debt have been wiped out after the prison sentance? If so I don't agree with doing time instead of paying, she should still have had have to pay after.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
as far as i know you still owe the money when you get out
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Quote:
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
She should pay up and shut up.If more people "paid up and shut up" we'd all have to pay alot less.The law is the law and it's people who break the law make the hard working people like me have to pay taxes to keep them in prison.Unfortunately these days the law abiding,hard workers are the victims due to the lazy bone idol scroungers and law breaking idiots.We have to pay for you scum.
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
If as a Republican, I decided to withhold the percentage of my taxes that get paid out via the civil list to the royal family, I wonder if my just imprisonment for breaking the law, would receive the same amount support from the press as this woman's has?
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
the stupid owd bat only got released because of her age and the papers/ television coverage let one of the young ones try it and see how long they have to serve?THE BLOODY COUNTRY IS A MESS SIMPLE!
|
Re: 7 Days in Prison for £53.71
Her release was nothing to do with her age. It was because somebody paid the bill and so the reason for imprisoning her no longer existed.
She didn't want to plead poverty because she isn't poor. She was taking a stand on behalf of others less able to do so. Yes Chav the system we had before "Poll Tax" (Community Charge to give it the proper name) was the rates and every property had a rateable value which was part of the estate agents description when you went to buy a house. It would say "RV such and such" which gave a figure for calculating the rates payable (which depended on the council each year as to how much they needed to rake in in total). The furore at the Community Charge was that it was levied per individual adult and so you got the situation where some households were paying two or three times what they'd paid under the old rates system. So we then got Council Tax instead which is a kind of hybrid because it's based on a valuation done on the property (to band it A, B. C etc) but also gives a discount where there is only one adult living in the house. I don't think the old rates system had a single adult discount so in some ways the Council Tax is possibly fairer but maybe it's time to have a rethink about a local income tax (though quite how it would be administered is beyond me) I think it was one of the altrnative suggestions put forth to oppose the "Poll Tax" but it failed in favour of the Council Tax which is easier to allocate and claim. (I think) I'm not totally against the Council Tax personally, just think that perhaps it could be less if money wasn't wasted as it so often is. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com