Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

MIck because of his pending operation & I because well I haven't given up since the last time, went cold turkey just over a month ago, Mick is sticking to it very well, I could kill for a fag, (erm, ciggy Rindy).

But we are both doing it without the aid of free publicity from the Obo'

So please Gayle stop being so nice and give me a reason to shout at you!

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

That's my problem Less, I'm far too nice - especially to you! lol

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

Loved your letter Gayle. You tell 'em how it is not how they think it is.
My little'un is also in this weeks observor dressed as a roman. He was chosen because he is the most enthusiastic learner on the subject. Just for once they are learning something he doesn't find boring

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

I am working through the online version and I am liking what they have this week especially the story of the doctor being forced from his surgery. Love the speed camera article as if they are so expensive to run why have them in the first place. Speed bumps and traffic calming would be easier.

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

Like you I have the online version and my big grip is that we don't get the letters page.

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

I agree with you Bazf I have to use the online version so maybe a kind AccyWeb member could scan them into there pc and mail/post them for those of us who cannot get the paper.:)

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

Just to clarify a few things:

The paper now has twice as many reporters as it did two weeks ago, so we're producing more and so there's less space to put things in.

No doubt, we'll try to get the Players review in next week.

Also, if anyone does happen to get a snap of the council leader having a fag, I'd be glad to receive it :)

I spoke to him yesterday and he said he so far hasn't succumbed, though one particular issue is making him want to :)

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

Hope that's me!

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

Pleeeeeeeease not speed bumps and traffic calming raising it's ugly head once more! Introduced to this area by a non-driving idiot, speed bumps cause cars to suffer from far greater wear and tear which is dangerous for all, and as for traffic calming, the sound peoples brakes have to make when an idiot forces his way through these death traps, CALMING?, more like the traffic is having a nervous break down! I would rather fork out extra for the useless cameras.

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/12/12_2_1.gif

Re: In Friday's Observer (28 October)
 

I see that sugestion is a crow in the throught Less. If done poperly it works as out side the two schools up here it only becomes dangerous due to idiots. Mind you they did refrain from the speed bumps though and the accidents and near misses our down.