Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   90 days detention (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/90-days-detention-17902.html)

cashman 09-11-2005 16:33

90 days detention
 
see the government has just been defeated on the 90 dayd bill,what really riles me is all the polls conducted show more than 70% of the public are in favour of 90 days,and yes mps are entitled to vote for their convictions,but more than 50 mps abstained- that i can't stomach! if you can't vote with your heart on matters of national security then these who crawled under the nearest stone should not be representing the general public.(:mad: end of rant)

SPUGGIE J 09-11-2005 16:40

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman
see the government has just been defeated on the 90 dayd bill,what really riles me is all the polls conducted show more than 70% of the public are in favour of 90 days,and yes mps are entitled to vote for their convictions,but more than 50 mps abstained- that i can't stomach! if you can't vote with your heart on matters of national security then these who crawled under the nearest stone should not be representing the general public.(:mad: end of rant)

I hope that the constituents of those who abstain give them what for!!!!

At times like this the public should be telling their MP's how they want them to vote. Its to important to all to let MP's vote based on convictions. We put them there to protect our intrests!!!!

Tealeaf 09-11-2005 16:45

Re: 90 days detention
 
How did Pope vote? Do we know yet?

SPUGGIE J 09-11-2005 16:48

Re: 90 days detention
 
Proberly abstained or against he wouldnt want to upset his "constituants" he needs them on side.

Doug 09-11-2005 16:50

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J
I hope that the constituents of those who abstain give them what for!!!!

At times like this the public should be telling their MP's how they want them to vote. Its to important to all to let MP's vote based on convictions. We put them there to protect our intrests!!!!

A very good point, they are supposed to convey the feelings of the constituents to parliament, Why are bells going off in my ears? Did any of us convey our feeling to them or have we left it for someone else to decide?

lettie 09-11-2005 17:08

Re: 90 days detention
 
I think it is disgusting that so many of them abstained....... They are voted in to speak on our behalf and in my opinion should not be allowed to abstain. If the people in power are not capable of making a decision then there is little hope for the rest of us.

No wonder this country is in such a sorry state.

entwisi 09-11-2005 19:56

Re: 90 days detention
 
Found this useful site

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/person/0,,-4221,00.html

Click the how they voted link to see just how much a whipping boy our bloke is.

chav1 09-11-2005 20:14

Re: 90 days detention
 
SACK HIM ......... :mad:

as you can guess i am in favour of detaining terrorist suspects , i wonder how many more bombs have to go off or chemical weapons have to be found in our country before these idiots wake up

SPUGGIE J 09-11-2005 20:25

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J
Proberly abstained or against he wouldnt want to upset his "constituants" he needs them on side.

Ok what was meant as humour turned out true. Can we find a nice big tree and some rope please. Also require very sharp knife and axe to do the job properly.

SPUGGIE J 09-11-2005 20:28

Re: 90 days detention
 
Looks like my MP is against the bill as well which considering the target size of the refinery and chemical plants up here is a shocker.

entwisi 09-11-2005 20:37

Re: 90 days detention
 
One problem is that this bill would give them power to detain ANYONE who spoke against them for three months without charge. Remember that old bloke at the party conference? Yep they could have stuck him away till after Xmas with absolutely no charge or comeback just for disagreeing with Straw. Whilst I agree that we should be vigilant against terrorists you can't go locking people up for no reason. there lies the stuff of horror stories.

cashman 09-11-2005 22:05

Re: 90 days detention
 
what the old bloke did was shout nonsense,and was treated like a criminal for it, that seems a bit differant to me than detaining terror suspects!

WillowTheWhisp 10-11-2005 00:08

Re: 90 days detention
 
Even the police reckon they need 90 days.

chav1 10-11-2005 00:31

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp
Even the police reckon they need 90 days.

and thats just to turn up to a 999 call :(

SPUGGIE J 10-11-2005 00:43

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1
and thats just to turn up to a 999 call :(

Thats on a good day wether permiting and providing there are no moterists around to persecute. :D

mani 10-11-2005 03:22

Re: 90 days detention
 
what alot of the opposers to this bill are sayin is instead of giving htem 90 days to hold em lets maybe give the police more time than 28 but also give them the means to do the 90days work in less time eg more specialist officers

WillowTheWhisp 10-11-2005 07:39

Re: 90 days detention
 
If the police are saying it could take up to 90 days sometimes I think I'd be inclined to go along with them. I can see the concern that an innocent person could be held for 3 months and have done nothing but the police would have pretty strong suspicions befire arresting them in the first place.

I know mistakes can be made but I'd rather it be a mistake of holding and innocent person than of letting a guilty one go free and yet more people being killed.

I agree Mani that we should have more police available to do the work. We should have more police available in general.

entwisi 10-11-2005 08:19

Re: 90 days detention
 
Did anyone see the report as to how much money teh police forces of this coiuntry have in teh bank? I heard there was enough to pay for another 19 THOUSAND officers.

garinda 10-11-2005 09:50

Re: 90 days detention
 
The only person to come out of this well is Tony Blair. All the public opinion polls show that the majority of the country is behind the defeated measures of allowing the police up to 90 days detention for suspected terrorists.

It was bad enough the Labour back benches voted against it, but for the Tory party to put our national security at risk to try and score political points is disgraceful. It looks like it has back fired against the Tories anyway. I've just been listening to the radio, and life long Conservatives have been phoning in one after the other, saying that they are disgusted at their party for not listening to the advice of the police on this matter, and will not be voting Tory again.

cashman 10-11-2005 10:49

Re: 90 days detention
 
from what ive seen and heard it seems to be all about blairs style of leadership-to autocratic! well maybe thats the case i can't stand the man anyway, but to vote against or abstain on a matter of our security is just despicable.

Less 10-11-2005 10:56

Re: 90 days detention
 
I can't understand the fuss, absolutely no need for 90 days detention.

Anyone supected of terrorism should just be given a Brazilian passport and a 5 second start at the entrance to one of the London Underground Stations!

cashman 10-11-2005 11:01

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less
I can't understand the fuss, absolutely no need for 90 days detention.

Anyone supected of terrorism should just be given a Brazilian passport and a 5 second start at the entrance to one of the London Underground Stations!

less its me being serious for once- but that has just cracked me up big time.:D

garinda 10-11-2005 11:10

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less
I can't understand the fuss, absolutely no need for 90 days detention.

Anyone supected of terrorism should just be given a Brazilian passport and a 5 second start at the entrance to one of the London Underground Stations!

I haven't forgot this little matter, but will wait until the enquirey is published to reignite that gem of a thread.:)

Tealeaf 10-11-2005 11:14

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J
Looks like my MP is against the bill as well which considering the target size of the refinery and chemical plants up here is a shocker.

Errrrrr....Check again. It looks like our MP is sound on terrorism. On previous occaisions, he has voted FOR govenment bills and AGAINST watering-down amendments. But still don't know last nights vote.

garinda 10-11-2005 11:16

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf
Errrrrr....Check again. It looks like our MP is sound on terrorism. On previous occaisions, he has voted FOR govenment bills and AGAINST watering-down amendments. But still don't know last nights vote.

Spuggie lives in Scotland, and so his MP is different to ours/yours.

Less 10-11-2005 11:19

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
I haven't forgot this little matter, but will wait until the enquirey is published to reignite that gem of a thread.:)

This actually has the makings of a good conspiricy theory, that guy probably wasn't a Brazillian but someone high up in the echolon of the terrorists and rather than him being turned into a martyr MI5 got in touch with the Brazilian authorities and bunged them a few quid so they could make up a story about some poor innocent being killed!

Result = no back lash from the fanatical terrorists, after all they won't care about someone innocent being killed!!!!!!!!

We'll know if I'm right if I don't post for a few days and you hear about me taking up hurdling over the barriers in the underground.

cashman 10-11-2005 11:20

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf
Errrrrr....Check again. It looks like our MP is sound on terrorism. On previous occaisions, he has voted FOR govenment bills and AGAINST watering-down amendments. But still don't know last nights vote.

Errrrr..... thats usually one of my tricks tealeaf lol:D :)

jambutty 10-11-2005 12:18

Re: 90 days detention
 
Many of the electorate abstain from voting cashman so you can hardly blame an MP for doing the same.

Polls of just a few thousand people can never be truly representative of the umpteen million who are eligible to vote. It is only an indication of how they MIGHT vote if asked and we weren’t.

MP’s are not voted into office to speak on our behalf lettie but to act in accordance with the manifesto that they presented to their constituents before being elected. As most if not all MP’s were voted into office by a minority they cannot represent all their constituents. If something comes up that was not included in the manifesto then the MP is free to vote as his conscience dictates – subject to the Whips of course. But that’s another argument.

Personally I disagree with the 90 days without charge detention. 28 days is enough time to get sufficient evidence to charge them. Well it would be if the police had the manpower. The real problem here is a police force that has been virtually stripped to the bone so that they cannot cope with normal crime let alone suspected terrorists.
Quote:

I know mistakes can be made but I'd rather it be a mistake of holding and innocent person than of letting a guilty one go free and yet more people being killed.


That comment is directly opposed to the reason why we don’t have capital punishment WillowTheWisp. Rather one guilty person goes free than an innocent person is hanged.

We can’t have it both ways.

WillowTheWhisp 10-11-2005 12:24

Re: 90 days detention
 
We're not talking about hanging them. We're talking about holding them in custody for 90 days.

Yes we can have it both ways. We can hold people for 90 days without hanging anybody.

cashman 10-11-2005 12:24

Re: 90 days detention
 
just heard micheal meacher saying he voted against 90 days because the case was not made for needing it. sir ian blair on the other hand said before the vote the police needed it, now we all know he isn't always correct but at the end of the day to me he has far more knowledge and in a better position to gauge the time required than meacher,or any of us, i would say to these sanctimonious cretins that voted against- how many MPs were blown up in london? NON it was all unfortunate members of the public. they are really looking after our interests.

Bazf 10-11-2005 16:21

Re: 90 days detention
 
Just looked at the Voting and heres a surprise with a No Vote a certain Jerry Adams you would have thought he would have voted against it, also Paisley voted for it! it a strange world when 2 ex, and I use the word loosely, terrorists vote on a matter like this.
The full list of voters
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005520222,00.html

andrewb 10-11-2005 17:24

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by entwisi
One problem is that this bill would give them power to detain ANYONE who spoke against them for three months without charge. Remember that old bloke at the party conference? Yep they could have stuck him away till after Xmas with absolutely no charge or comeback just for disagreeing with Straw. Whilst I agree that we should be vigilant against terrorists you can't go locking people up for no reason. there lies the stuff of horror stories.

Indeed. I totaly agree with the 90day terrorism bill (even if I do detest Blair, but no point voting against him for the hell of it when hes actualy talking sense)

BUT measures have to be put in so that the police can't abuse the terrorism act, the prime example of it is of course the guy at the labour party conference who was held under the terrorism act. Completly unapropriate and quite frankly an abuse of power.

garinda 10-11-2005 17:27

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr
Indeed. I totaly agree with the 90day terrorism bill (even if I do detest Blair, but no point voting against him for the hell of it when hes actualy talking sense)

BUT measures have to be put in so that the police can't abuse the terrorism act, the prime example of it is of course the guy at the labour party conference who was held under the terrorism act. Completly unapropriate and quite frankly an abuse of power.

It's a pity the Tory's who voted against the bill didn't agree with you. Using this to score political points was a definite vote looser for your party.

Acrylic-bob 10-11-2005 17:52

Re: 90 days detention
 
Personally, I think that it is disgraceful that British MP's should be more concerned over the human rights of a minority of terroist scum than concerned with national security and the protection of the lives of law-abiding, tax-paying British citizens.

It just goes to prove, yet again, how removed from everyday reality these people really are. As for Pope, he will do whatever the government tell him to do; rebels go to the back of the queue when preferment is being considered.

Doug 10-11-2005 18:25

Re: 90 days detention
 
Greg Pope!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well.:rolleyes: That just goes to show that mountain air is not that good for the grey bit between the ears. When tealeaf asked how Pope have voted I got confused and was trying to fathom what the hell the Pope had to do with it :o :o :o

I'm not joking :o

Doug 10-11-2005 18:26

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob
Personally, I think that it is disgraceful that British MP's should be more concerned over the human rights of a minority of terroist scum than concerned with national security and the protection of the lives of law-abiding, tax-paying British citizens.

It just goes to prove, yet again, how removed from everyday reality these people really are. As for Pope, he will do whatever the government tell him to do; rebels go to the back of the queue when preferment is being considered.

I totally agree with you A-B.

Bazf 10-11-2005 22:14

Re: 90 days detention
 
Heres the first one on his way back, good old Greg, he might even move to Accy what would our leader do then?.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005520291,00.html

garinda 10-11-2005 22:18

Re: 90 days detention
 
He'll probably even get his benefits back dated.:(

cashman 10-11-2005 22:46

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf
Heres the first one on his way back, good old Greg, he might even move to Accy what would our leader do then?.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005520291,00.html

that took me unawares bazf-didn't take you for a sun reader.:D :D :D

andrewb 11-11-2005 00:00

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
It's a pity the Tory's who voted against the bill didn't agree with you. Using this to score political points was a definite vote looser for your party.

Yup, I dont get it and quite surprised at the way they voted considering what the prospective leaders have been saying..

SPUGGIE J 11-11-2005 01:08

Re: 90 days detention
 
End result of this mad preachers will return. :(

chav1 11-11-2005 02:20

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf
Heres the first one on his way back, good old Greg, he might even move to Accy what would our leader do then?.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005520291,00.html

even he prefers our country to the sh1t hole hes been living in.

wheres he going to live when hes blown up this country the hypocryt :mad:

mani 11-11-2005 03:36

Re: 90 days detention
 
greg voted for this bill right???

that means he supported this bill

garinda 11-11-2005 08:49

Re: 90 days detention
 
Yes Greg Pope supported the bill, and voted with the Prime Minister.

Bad-Wolf 11-11-2005 10:56

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr
Indeed. I totaly agree with the 90day terrorism bill (even if I do detest Blair, but no point voting against him for the hell of it when hes actualy talking sense)

BUT measures have to be put in so that the police can't abuse the terrorism act, the prime example of it is of course the guy at the labour party conference who was held under the terrorism act. Completly unapropriate and quite frankly an abuse of power.

I quite agree though of course it was not the Police that detained him rather the cronies hired as security men by the Labour party for the conference. The man in question (the detainee) was advised to sue the Labour party for security guards do not have the right to detain only remove!

Though as as been proven the case many times already, Blair considers himself above the law!

cashman 11-11-2005 11:10

Re: 90 days detention
 
sorry bad wolf blair is not above the law- blair is the LAW. lol

SPUGGIE J 11-11-2005 12:16

Re: 90 days detention
 
President I do as I please Blair got a wedgey this time but will it stop him?

grannyclaret 11-11-2005 13:32

Re: 90 days detention
 
i cant believe joan humble (our m.p) voted no.... .
i realy do think we nead 90 days....

cashman 11-11-2005 13:34

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grannyclaret
i cant believe joan humble (our m.p) voted no.... .
i realy do think we nead 90 days....

that must be the opinion of those she represents granny! I THINK NOT lol;)

Wynonie Harris 13-11-2005 16:01

Re: 90 days detention
 
Lord Carlile, the LIB DEM peer, who is the independent reviewer of anti-terror laws has said he felt that the police needed 90 days to investigate terror suspects. He said that he knew of at least two or three cases where terror suspects could not be prosecuted on appropriate charges because police ran out of time.

Labour rebels, Lib Dem and Tory MPs, hang your heads in shame...

cashman 13-11-2005 16:40

Re: 90 days detention
 
you just beat me to it wyn have just read it myself, what really amazes me is many of these plebs backed tony blair when he was wrong, now he's right for once they oppose or abstain, this is just political point scoring run amock.

Wynonie Harris 13-11-2005 17:14

Re: 90 days detention
 
Don't forget the Tories who are supposedly so tough on terrorism, but were quite willing to desert their principles for the sake of political gamesmanship.

Disgraceful.

cashman 13-11-2005 17:20

Re: 90 days detention
 
i aint forgetting any of em wyn to me they are all a complete disgrace to the people of this country and should be on the dole! a working person that cocked up like that - feet wouldn't touch.

SPUGGIE J 13-11-2005 17:39

Re: 90 days detention
 
When are our MPs going to listen to experts and their constituants and help sort out this mess before we have a 7/7 again or something worse?

cashman 14-11-2005 21:18

Re: 90 days detention
 
after seeing the arrests in australia of the alleged terrorists- its claimed they have discovered hydrocloric acid,plus another substance used in the manufacture of explosives, also a training video at one of their homes, if this turns out to be accurate and the police have not enough evidence to make charges stick in the time period, the question i put to all these fools who think 28 days or 90 is not acceptable. should the authorities RELEASE them? their obviously not members of the local pool team. i would love any of the M.P.s who did not support the government to comment -if this was britain?:mad:

SPUGGIE J 15-11-2005 06:41

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman
after seeing the arrests in australia of the alleged terrorists- its claimed they have discovered hydrocloric acid,plus another substance used in the manufacture of explosives, also a training video at one of their homes, if this turns out to be accurate and the police have not enough evidence to make charges stick in the time period, the question i put to all these fools who think 28 days or 90 is not acceptable. should the authorities RELEASE them? their obviously not members of the local pool team. i would love any of the M.P.s who did not support the government to comment -if this was britain?:mad:

They would be heckled and egged then have the protesters arrested for be terrorists. :rolleyes:

cashman 15-11-2005 11:51

Re: 90 days detention
 
going back to abstentions! i have noticed quite a few on this thread (cashy wonders why) lol:D

SPUGGIE J 15-11-2005 13:27

Re: 90 days detention
 
If they are believed to guilty hold em like the Yanks do "Indefinately" ;)

garinda 15-11-2005 14:52

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman
going back to abstentions! i have noticed quite a few on this thread (cashy wonders why) lol:D

Indeed. Besides Cyfr, there has been very little comment from our Tory members on this.

Tories tough on terrorism my backside. Though more than happy to score political points against Blair, rather than protect our national security.

Tealeaf 15-11-2005 15:26

Re: 90 days detention
 
[quote=garinda]Indeed. Besides Cyfr, there has been very little comment from our Tory members on this.

quote]

How do you know who the tory members are?

SPUGGIE J 15-11-2005 15:28

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
Indeed. Besides Cyfr, there has been very little comment from our Tory members on this.

Tories tough on terrorism my backside. Though more than happy to score political points against Blair, rather than protect our national security.

Wonder if they would be happy scoring points if god forbid there was another terrorist attack as in Brighton in 86? How ould that be explain especially if the police knew something was afoot but didnt have the time they wanted to stop it. If police need 90 days to stop it and only got 28 and those that had been held went ahead and did the deed who would they blame? Answer everyone bar themselves. This bunch of wimps are endangering lives of innocent people for thes points they so desperately want. I am not a fan of everything Tony Blair wants but this is as vital as your heartbeat!!!!!! :mad:

cashman 15-11-2005 16:36

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
Indeed. Besides Cyfr, there has been very little comment from our Tory members on this.

Tories tough on terrorism my backside. Though more than happy to score political points against Blair, rather than protect our national security.

well i wasn't JUSTrefering to our tory MEMBERS.;)

Doug 15-11-2005 16:40

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
Indeed. Besides Cyfr, there has been very little comment from our Tory members on this.

Tories tough on terrorism my backside. Though more than happy to score political points against Blair, rather than protect our national security.

I voted Tory, Is that really a problem. :)

garinda 15-11-2005 16:44

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug
I voted Tory, Is that really a problem. :)

Not all. It's very brave of you to come out.

Do you think the Tories were right to support the Labour rebels to defeat the 90 day bill, just so they could make political headway?

Doug 15-11-2005 17:03

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
Not all. It's very brave of you to come out.

Do you think the Tories were right to support the Labour rebels to defeat the 90 day bill, just so they could make political headway?

Why 90 Day’s……..What happens if you find your evidence on day 94 when the would be terrorist has left the country. The length of detention is irrelevant. If you need more time you go to the judge when appropriate. What you going to do if you don’t have sufficient cause to hold someone after your 90 days are up, you apply for more. What Blaire was doing was playing up to the public and claiming the high moral ground, it is he who playing political games because he knows that there will always be those people that will crib about this subject and take their eyes off the ball. If you want to act against this threat you take the appropriate action and stand by your decision come what may. I would prefer it if the money spent on long periods of detention was spent on building up the intelligence network and bullets. Identify your target. Mark It. Destroy it. We would save a fortune that way, so we can spend more money people who deserve something better than petty political ramblings...

SPUGGIE J 15-11-2005 17:41

Re: 90 days detention
 
There is more serious debate on this issue here than I thought there could be. Its good to see (without the hand bags wood be better). We have for against and abstentions, bit like Westminster. :)

mani 16-11-2005 17:34

Re: 90 days detention
 
i dont know if this has been said or not but one thing i find strange

when the anti-iraq protests were going on - and public opinion was showing we shudnt b participating in the war - blair totally ignored the public opinion.

now that he's lost this vote for the 90 day detention he's runnin to the point that the public wanted it...

garinda 16-11-2005 17:40

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug
Why 90 Day’s....... The length of detention is irrelevant.

All the evidence, including that from the police, suggested ninety days would be needed to collate all the information, and then to either charge or free the suspected terorrists.

If your going to be churlish about it, you might as well say that the evidence should be gathered in ninety minutes, and if not let 'em go.

mani 16-11-2005 17:50

Re: 90 days detention
 
the prob is that the 7/7 bombers were soo well "hidden" that british security ppl are now spooked into thinkin anyone and everyone cud b a potential terrorist. like that guy babbar ahmed - he's been let off by british police as not having any links with terrorisism yet the usa want to extradite him. his family are fearin that they wont see him for a few yrs as he probably will b taken straight to guantanamo out of us law.

with the 90 day thing i cud easily be locked up for 90 days as they trek thru my pc or search my back ground and be inconclusive. yet for that simple thing i know i wud lose my job straight away as i work for the home office.

SPUGGIE J 17-11-2005 08:16

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mani
the prob is that the 7/7 bombers were soo well "hidden" that british security ppl are now spooked into thinkin anyone and everyone cud b a potential terrorist. like that guy babbar ahmed - he's been let off by british police as not having any links with terrorisism yet the usa want to extradite him. his family are fearin that they wont see him for a few yrs as he probably will b taken straight to guantanamo out of us law.

with the 90 day thing i cud easily be locked up for 90 days as they trek thru my pc or search my back ground and be inconclusive. yet for that simple thing i know i wud lose my job straight away as i work for the home office.

Mani if you work for the home office then you would have had stringent background checks done prior to starting the job. These would be as tough or tougher than the ones some suspects would face.

You will just have to get rid of shoot em up games in case they consider that training. ;)

mani 19-11-2005 01:50

Re: 90 days detention
 
i've already had to delete doom and half life incase they thought i was gonna b spreadin some kinda virus and was using the game to practise my survival techniques... :(

dont even get me started on having to delete civilisation 4, command and conquer, airport tycoon and havin to throw away my dvd of the great escape...

SPUGGIE J 19-11-2005 11:16

Re: 90 days detention
 
Sad thing is mani that it wont belong before all that you said could be concidered training.

chav1 19-11-2005 11:50

Re: 90 days detention
 
i used to have microsoft flight simulator but gave it up as a bad job..

the only thing under threat of a terrorist attack from me was the runway lol

SPUGGIE J 19-11-2005 13:13

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1
i used to have microsoft flight simulator but gave it up as a bad job..

the only thing under threat of a terrorist attack from me was the runway lol

Glad I aint the onlyone bad at gaming.

chav1 19-11-2005 15:10

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J
Glad I aint the onlyone bad at gaming.

nope your still on your own its only flight sims ime crap at and their mainly for very sad people anyway so no biggie lol

the only thing sadder is train simulators how anyone can sit infront of a pc and drive a train for hours on end is beyond belief lol

garinda 19-11-2005 15:13

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1
the only thing sadder is train simulators how anyone can sit infront of a pc and drive a train for hours on end is beyond belief lol

I have a virtual life game, and have played it for years. I find it very rewarding and not at all sad.;)

SPUGGIE J 19-11-2005 15:17

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda
I have a virtual life game, and have played it for years. I find it very rewarding and not at all sad.;)

In to the The Sims big time G?

chav1 19-11-2005 16:19

Re: 90 days detention
 
lol spuggie garindas idea of a virtual life game is dressing up as a woman and calling himself mandy at the weekends

mani 19-11-2005 16:35

Re: 90 days detention
 
*L*

was it ever proven that the 9/11 terrorists used ms flight sim as training or was it someoen sittin in the office thinkin bloody hell they cud've used this.. wait a min! they must've! and then printed it...

garinda 19-11-2005 16:35

Re: 90 days detention
 
Not Mandy.

Otherwise if I went in the Stag Paul would have me pullin' one.;)

chav1 19-11-2005 17:18

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mani
*L*

was it ever proven that the 9/11 terrorists used ms flight sim as training

yes because like anything to do with microsoft the end result was a crash :D

SPUGGIE J 19-11-2005 18:09

Re: 90 days detention
 
I think G.W is fighting the wrong people. Bill Gates is the one to watch he does want world dominace and has the tools to do it.

mani 19-11-2005 21:36

Re: 90 days detention
 
*LMAO* @ chav1

Mik Dickinson 20-11-2005 10:31

Re: 90 days detention
 
So reading all the views maybe we should have a vorte on the subject.I am for a minimum of 90 days

SPUGGIE J 20-11-2005 11:21

Re: 90 days detention
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mik Dickinson
So reading all the views maybe we should have a vorte on the subject.I am for a minimum of 90 days

I am for 90 days minimum Mik

Mik Dickinson 20-11-2005 13:48

Re: 90 days detention
 
OK Spuggie then what we need is a moderator to start a vote.Seen it on the Forum a couple of times and at least we know the Genera Publics views.

Len 20-11-2005 14:04

Re: 90 days detention
 
OK.
Poll has now been added.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com