Originally Posted by garinda

Women should be able to do what they like. The days of covering piano legs are long gone, as are the days when women had to cover up to be 'decent'.

Originally Posted by Doug

I past comment in A-Bs thread that I felt that in the case of murder the choice of “Twelve Good Men” may be an ideal that has past into history, as with the case for the death sentence I feel that a panel of Judges might be more appropriate for the consideration and sentencing of Rape cases. A profession jury is less likely to react emotively and act appropriately in the interest of the public. I do believe that Rape cases should be conducted in a manner where the perpetrator and victim should be given anonymity until all the evidence is available and the investigation is complete. I believe that to give a man’s or woman’s name to the public prior to a conviction being made is in itself a crime.

A man or woman falsely accused face a life of ruin irrespective of the eventual outcome, by the same token any male or female falsely accusing another person of rape should know that they will face prosecution and a custodial sentence for there maliciousness. Although I think it’s wrong to blame a victim for the actions of another I do believe that when an individual is shown to have actively encouraged the sexual attentions of another that they must face their responsibility for their own actions and this should be taken into consideration when sentencing the perpetrator.

In regard to the dressing provocatively and the rest of it, well I think that as gone on since we wore animal skins, that said we should all take appropriate action to insure our own welfare and safety when we are going out, either alone or with friends.

Originally Posted by Doug

Originally Posted by garinda

Ok, I'm still drawn to the bit where you say, and I quote in full,

To then go on to say provocative dress had been around since we wore animal skins, I do find disturbing.

Originally Posted by Doug

Originally Posted by garinda

Garinda Fashion/Textiles B.A. (Hons.)
I do happen to know the social implications of dress throughout the ages.;)

Originally Posted by Doug

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J

So the clothing that is worn if classed as "provocative" should meen by all means look but you cannot touch?

Originally Posted by garinda

Errrrr..................YES Spuggie!

Your not telling me that if you saw a girl with a short skirt and a low cut top, you would take it as an invitation to touch her????????

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J

So the clothing that is worn if classed as "provocative" should meen by all means look but you cannot touch?

Originally Posted by garinda

Yes I do, but I still stand believe that provocative dress shouldn't be used as evidence of any consent in a rape trial. Something that could be implied from your original post.

Originally Posted by Doug