![]() |
Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Just on Granada, bloke at 101 who is still driving. What do we all think about it. Too old? I must say he did seem quite lucid, more so than a lot of old people I see. So how could we ensure that we don't discriminate but ensure that people whose reactions etc are just not up to the job are stopped from being a danger?
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I thought that you had to have medicals after a certain age in order to re-apply for your license.... Presumably if he has passed his medical tests etc then he is legally deemed as being safe on the road. Let's face it, he is probably safer than a hell of a lot of the idiots on our roads today.:)
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
The problem is that the 'medical' involves getting your GP to sign a piece of paper. It does not require a sight test, reactions, or any check of the ability to make rational decisions quickly.
I know from my own experience that towards the end of his life my Dad was not really fit to drive. He knew it himself as well and would always make me drive if we were going somewhere together. It is very hard for people to give something up like that. That is why we need regular checks. Without sounding ageist in any way, I personally think that we should ALL have to take a checkup/test every few years. People will say it costs too much, how much does an accident cost when all services are taken into account. Its just that goverments seem unable to think proactively anymore. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I entered this thread thinking you were talking about speed, I was going to say your better sticking to 99mpg because it is an instant (ish) ban at 100mph.
But your talking about age. I think each person should be assessed on an individual basis. Age effects us all differently. Some people at 60 may physically be more capable of driving than others at 30. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
The tests were very thorough. I had to go on various machines to test reaction times for two hours, as well as drive for an hour around Wigan. They could have taken my licence off me that day, renewed it for a year, or for three years. Happily they renewed my licence for the maximum three years before I have to go through it all again. If the tests older drivers are as thorough as the ones I did, they deserve to be on the roads, and they are probably a lot safer than a lot of the boy racers, who seemed to have picked up most of their driving skills from playing on the Playstation. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
I don't think they will ever bring in such thorough test's for people because of age. Just imagine how many people would have to employed to do it. Each tester would only manage 2 or 3 people a day. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Obviously people can become incapable of driving at different ages and for different reasons. It shouldn't be regarded as ageist for people to have re-tests beyond a certain age. We all get old (unless we pop our clogs first) just as we have all been young at one time. Just because someone is elderly doesn't mean they are less capable. On the other hand I've seen some very doddery looking people driving and I wouldn't fancy being in the car with them.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
He wouldnt have passed a test anyway because in those days they didnt have to.
I wonder what his first car was? |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I would trust someone with his driving expeience than some that are in their late teens early 20's on the road today. If is health and reactions are good then there should be no problems with him driving.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Your license lasts for 50 years doesn't it?
Does that mean he passed his test in his 50's? Surely he would have had to reapply or take another test if he was younger!! |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
I totally disagree on that one!!!! :not_ripe: |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Because half of the old folk on the road today dont have a clue wot day it is let alone wot is around them on the road, right young people do have a lot of accidents but there is a lot more of them and at least we have a sense of direction!!!!
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I speak as a professional driver in my early fifties and it has been my opinion for a long time that a persons ability to drive has little to do with wether an individual is young, old, male, female, fat, thin, etc. I think it is unfair to pidgeon hole people into fit/unfit categories purely because of age. The ability to control the vehicle to the required standard and the reactions in the case of emergency is what counts. What I will say is with age sometimes comes infirmity in both mind and body and if this is the case with the individual then he/she should not be driving on these crowded roads today, I hope to be alive when I am 100, and if I am I hope that I will also be able to drive but if I am not fit then I won't drive.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
Yeah I have been frustrated at times being stuck behind an older person driving really slow, oh but then they were sticking to the speed limit!! I have also been frustrated by a young un stuck to my tail light impatient to get past and I'm not exactly a slouch on the road. I would rather be stuck behind an older person, damn sight safer... as long as you keep your distance though :p ;) |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
i got stuck behind some dithering idiot doing 15 mph in a 40 limit area , at first i thought it was some young pratt acting daft as there were no safe points to overtake with it been a country lane
only when i eventualy found a place to overtake and was flipping the finger at the pillock did i realise it was infact an elderly driver with less awareness to his surroundings than Mr McGoo :mad: stick them in a simulator and if they fail to get into the top ten on the scoreboard take their licenses of them :D |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
they should be made to give up driving when they reach the age of 70
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
driving at 101 years?!?, No they should not be!
why?..... After age 80, there is a sharp decline in driving ability, although many drivers continue driving safely. Drivers over 80 are more than twice as likely to be at fault in a fatal collision than the average driver there reactions would be too slow:( there eyesight will be nearly gone they probably have the shakes:eek: more chance of having a heart attack at the wheel...killing other people (i know you can have a heart attack at any age but 101 you more chance!) they dont look left and right anymore just straight ahead, oblivious of anyone else around and probably deaf as a bat! and have there hearing aid switched off cuz of nagging wife!, if still around that is!) and probably many more reasons .............:p |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
I am sorry to pigeon hole people but experiance counts for a lot. Someone who has only been driving for a couple of years, johnboy, is unlikely to be as competant a driver as someone who has been driving for 10 or 20 years. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
For those who didn't see Granada Reports the gentleman in question said he had never done a driving test. He also managed an emergency stop when a white van pulled straight out in frnt of him. I think this man would be the exception rather than the rule when it comes to driving licences
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
infact i would lay good odds that a recently passed driver would do better on a driving test than someone with 20 years experience driving am i an angel on the road - am i hell i have adapted to every day driving by picking up the same habbits as all you more experienced drivers have although i am finding it hard to get rid of the push and pull method on the steering wheel but i have no doubt within a few weeks i will be turning corners one handed using the palm of my hand on the steering wheel just like everyone else a tip to anyone learning to drive once you pass throw the rule book out the window because no one else abides by it and the only way to survive is to do as they do , especialy as there are no police to pull up speeders , people parked on yellow lines at traffic lights , driving with headlights out or brake lights , the list goes on as my driving instructer said its a mean place and the road is full of people trying to kill you |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I've been driving for 40 years, up and down the motorways all over this country and abroad, and I take a pride in my driving. I've driven everything from a Mini to a 3 litre Jaguar (and a small removal van once but it's a long story) and I'm a member of the IAM.
I'm in my early 60s. I'm pretty confident that I'll still be a good driver in 10 years time but, in the interests of your safety and my own, I would be happy to be rigorously tested when I reach 70. If they told me I shouldn't drive any more, so be it. I've known some elderly drivers who should have been taken off the roads years ago and I've known some who were extremely good. I've known a lot of young people who considered themselves brilliant drivers. Some were, but with others it just meant they took stupid, aggressive risks and got away with it. I knew one who didn't get away with it and I went to his funeral 3 years ago. He was 21. I believe all drivers should be tested for competence and common sense at least every 10 years and people over 70 should be tested every 3 years because, let's face it, we all start to slow down at some point when we get older; some are later than others but it's Life, isn't it? If the 101 year old is competent, good luck to him, but he should be tested to make sure. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Well said West Ender. Everyone is an individual and we can't lump age groups together and judge all the same. A re-test as we get older is an excellent idea, every 10 years wouldn't be bad, maybe with advancing years every 5 would then be better.
I've also seen some very reckless youngsters on the roads who think they are good drivers. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Nice to westender that someone else agrees with me. Testing every few years should be compulsory for all. It should include eyesight, reactions as well as just driving.
Passing your test does not quantify you as a good driver, just someone who should be safe on the road unaccompanied. I also find it unbelieveable that you are not tested on Motorways at all. I drive over 100 miles a day to work, mainly on motorways and the standard of some drivers is disgraceful. There is an article in this months 'Bike' magazine where a survey was taken of drivers showing a load of road signs. The only one taht got 100% recognition was Speed Cameras! Even such as uneven road surface only got 23% recognition. Side winds got 8%, minimum speed limit had 0, yes, ZERO% The only way to improve this and driving standards is regular testing. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I agree that everyone should carry out some kind of test every 10 years or so to determine wether they are fit to drive, but just because someone is young does not mean they are bad drivers. Almost every young lad on the road these days gets tared with the same stick and are branded as a "Boy Racer", infact this is not true.
I agree there are a lot of young, stupid drivers out there but please dont automatically asume that all young drivers are stupid, and wreckless because i for one aint one of them. I also agree that there are some old people out there who are good drivers and dont fall under the catogry "Bad Drivers" but there are some out there who are useless and shouldnt be on the road, as for the one doing 101 mph, well he/she shouldnt be doing that speed in the first place and if they was one that was unfit to be on the road well the result could have been devastating, for them and some poor soul who was unfortunate to be in the wrong place at the wrong time!!!!! |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Nobody's been driving at 101 MPH Johnboy, he was 101 years old!
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
its a good job he wasnt 111 people would think he had been driving when ill
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
A company that I used to work for about 15 years ago employed a sales rep who was 72 at the time. He used to drive around his territory - Birmingham area - in second gear all the time. He never once went into third. He had never passed a driving test in his life because he started driving whilst in the army and it wasn't necessary. He could never understand why his gearbox needed replacing every six months.
He clearly wasn't a competant driver in some respects because he didn't have clue about how to drive a car, yet he never had an accident. I'm not sure what my point is but I think there might be one in there somewhere. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
the point is if your to dumb to use a manual gearbox getan automatic :-)
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
There we go, I knew you'd know what I was talking about even if I didn't!
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
The point is he never had an accident, he was an experienced driver albeit a little cautious, but I think the key word here is experience which is something that no amount of money can buy.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Right then folks here goes....
Driving license not issued for 50 years but only until holder reaches 70 years of age Male of 101 years of age fully mobile and alert able to control a motor vehicle in a safe manner any problems there? (Told that he looked more like an 80yo) When he started to drive test and license NOT required but think he'll have to have a medical every year from 70. Male 18 in Army, fully Mobile and alert passes his Driver training (Car and LGV with Hazmat and off-road) and can now handle a motor vehicle in a safe and controlled manner has his own car and could be branded as a BOY RACER but (as far as I'm aware) he doesn't do that (well said johnboy by the way) and he to has to drive on the motorway Male 49 fully mobile and alert (has to have medical checks every 3 years for his PCV) works on Emergency Ambulance and has to drive at speed above the speed limit (but within reason and safe for other road users) Been driving for 30 years and can drive any of the following Mopeds, Motorbikes, Cars Car with trailer, Small Lorries + trailers, Single Deckers, Double Deckers, Coaches, Mini-buses Ambulances etc. Urban roads, country roads, motorway etc Which one of the above is the BETTER driver?????????????? Chav please keep using the push-pull as you'll find it does help to keep the vehicle in control ANSWER:- ANY!!!! it all depends on how they handle to situation that is at hand be it traffic (volume, speed), the weather, the road conditions etc and so long as that gent is able to drive in a safe and controlled manner then power to him. |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I think we must all have a screw loose or we wouldn't be driving in the first place, putting our lives at risk day in day out on the roads, but it is good fun. By the way Bernard the medical is every 5 years from the age of 45 for PCV renewal.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
No Chav, you are supposed to change gear BEFORE you go round corners!
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
My late Uncle never passed a test because they didn't have them in the days when he learned to drive.
A friend in Southern Ireland has never passed a test for the same reason. Driving tests were introduced much later there than here. I have passed a test and have a current licence but I have problems with my eyes which make driving dangerous, yet legally I would be classified as fit because my refocussing problem isn't tested. I can see a number plate at the required distance if I don't look at something close-up first but if I am in a car and look at the speedo I cannot then see what's going on outside the windscreen for several seconds in which time I could easily have caused an accident. So I'm the only one with proof of capability and the only one not actually capable. As my old friend Graham would have said "Go figure" |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I think you will find most of what I said you should not be doing.
Anyway whats wrong with changing gear on a bend? |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Nothing wrong with changing gear on a bend Neil, but going round corners, for example turning left or right from a main road, the gear changing should be done before the turn as both hands are needed to turn the steering wheel. IMHO.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
What about people who drive with only one hand/arm? I have often wondered how safe some disabled people are behind the wheel. I know some cars are modified but not always. Before you all start shouting at me, I am not picking on disabled people just asking a logical question.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I know a chap who only has one arm but although his car has a normal steering wheel it does have a ball type handle to allow him to steer with one hand and it has automatic transmission.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
How does he indicate, switch on and off lights, windscreen wipers or even use his horn to warn other road users when neccesary?
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
I'm not sure, it never occurred to me but that is a valid point Neil. I think his switches are in just the same position as they would be on a normal Ford Fiesta I dont think the vehicle has been modified to that extent. Good Point.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Cars can be adapted so that all those things are on the steering wheel as buttons to be pressed.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
A long time ago when I was a young child I knew someone with one arm who drove a car and as Gayle says the buttons were on the steering wheel close to the knob so they could be activated without letting go of the knob.
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
Neil only knows because his first job was to walk in front of cars waving a flag.:D |
Re: Driving at 101, Safe or not?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com