![]() |
Local vs County
Just to help out when people are considering what they are voting for in the forthcoming elections I took this off Hyndburn Life's website. It is useful to know who to blame for what! :D
Here in Hyndburn we are served by a system which is known as "two tier" local government. In other words, we have two sorts of council serving local people - a county council and a district, or borough council. We have one county council, Lancashire County Council, and a borough council, Hyndburn Borough Council. The main services provided by Hyndburn Borough Council include: housing refuse collection leisure services such as swimming pools and leisure centres environmental health local planning The County Council's main services include: education and schools social services roads bridges and transport strategic planning libraries and museums economic development tourism promotion trading standards street lighting What it doesn't add is the sort of glossy bit that Hyndburn should be doing like securing investment in the town, generating businesses and promoting it as an individual tourism destination, plus working with the people to create a welcoming place and more vibrant place. |
Re: Local vs County
Is there a hint here that HBC is neglecting some of its duties?
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS!!!! :D |
Re: Local vs County
It makes me wonder if Blackburn with Darwen have got the right idea and kicked Lancashire CC out (for want of better words).
|
Re: Local vs County
It rather looks as if the gloves are off and the campaigning has begun in ernest.
For those of you who don't already know, Gayle is standing in the coming council elections as a candidate for the Labour Party.....against Peter Britcliffe. I never imagined that I would ever offer my support to a candidate for the Labour Party but, in this instance, It is easy to make an exception. GO FOR IT GAYLE! |
Re: Local vs County
Oh! See I come here browsing every day and didn't even know that. I'm going to stick my neck out and admit that i've no idea how the council elections work.
(Luckily it's unlikely that my politics teacher reads this forum so I can take a guess...) The area is split in to wards, then the wards vote for a counciler (like regions in national elections)? And then is a leader voted for seperatly? or.. *shrugs* maybe somebody could just be kind and explain! :p |
Re: Local vs County
The area is split into wards, then the wards vote for a councillor. Then the party that has the most wards has the control of the Council. Whoever is leader of that party becomes leader of the Council.
Each year only about a third of the wards are up for election, so this year there are 11 wards up for grabs. 8 are currently Labour and 3 are currently Conservative. Conservatives currently have over all control of the Council. In order for Labour to take control they have to keep all of their 8 wards plus win at least one of the Conservative ones. To keep control all the Conservatives have to do is hold their current 3 wards. |
Re: Local vs County
You make it sound almost exciting when put like that Gayle. I can't understand why some wards have more than one Councillor. If the ward is too big for one, why not make the wards smaller?
|
Re: Local vs County
Ah thankyou! Now how do I find out what ward I am in :p
I like the fact that a councillor posts on a public forum. If you become leader will you still post here often? As I would assume it would be hard to do that with public scrutiny and all.. :o |
Re: Local vs County
I suppose, and I'm only guessing here, that each ward Councillor will have roughly the same number of constituents so where there are two ward Councillors in one ward they'll have double the constituents. I'm also guessing that the reason they don't just divide the area into smaller areas is because they are roughly divided by towns or logical areas within towns.
What makes sense to me would be if a ward had two Councillors it would be beneficial to the ward to have one of each party. That way most of the people would be represented by one or the other of the two main parties on the Council. |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
http://www.hyndburnlife.co.uk/rounda...dents/hbc.html |
Re: Local vs County
Whoops double post.
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
However with HBC approximately one third of the Councillors are elected each year so as far as the electorate is concerned they only have one vote to elect one Councillor If you are going to have proportional voting you have got to change the voting system |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
But let's take St Andrew's ward as an example - it currently has two Conservative Councillors, only one of which is up for election this time. Therefore, will have at least one Conservative Councillor remaining after the election - it would make sense (to me) for a Labour Councillor (as an example) to be elected in the seat that is up for grabs so that the majority of the people of the ward are represented on the council. Of course, I am slightly biased so I might not be the right person to advise on this. |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
That's an interesting idea but unless you're suggesting that the Councils are tied in to the national elections in some way I'm not sure how it could work. I agree that there is too much 'blame' between national, county and local and it's an easy thing for any one of them to say 'not my fault guv, blame the others' for things. I'm going to say something daftish here but the one thing that I really don't like about politics is the 'politics' - by that I mean the 'blaming the other party' culture and the internal politics of voting once elected i.e. everyone voting down party lines. I believe (and this is very idealistic) that when you get voted on to the Council you should then be part of the bigger 'Team Hyndburn' and should all work together for the good of the area. I'm not the only one who thinks like that as there are some excellent Labour and Tory Councillors who currently work as a team and clearly I would be happy to work with them for the good of the area. Whilst I agree that structure is needed I think 'Team Hyndburn' should come first. If every politician thought that way then it would negate the need for your idea as everyone would be working for the greater good and there would be less 'blame' and in fighting. I think we're both a bit too idealistic on this though Neil as we have a system and it's unlikely to change so I think we just have to live with it. |
Re: Local vs County
You do get MP's voting against their own party at national level so I assume you do at local level.
|
Re: Local vs County
I hope so for the sake of common sense.
There is such thing as a whip and there are ocassions where Councillors are instructed by the whip as to which way they should vote. The situation there is that you can either vote against (and be in a whole heap of trouble with your party), vote for or abstain. As I'm not a Councillor (yet) I don't know how this works in practice. |
Re: Local vs County
I think the votes should be secret. None of this shouting rubbish. The whole system we use to vote PM's etc. into power relies on secret ballot so you can't be pressured. Then you get to Parliament and your MP does what he is told by his Party. There is something fundamentally wrong with that.
|
Re: Local vs County
Well, whilst secret ballots are useful in some ways they are open to fraud - no one can dispute a show of hands.
|
Re: Local vs County
Not if done correctly, this is the 21st century
|
Re: Local vs County
Try telling polititions that. Some think its still the C19 and they can do as they please.
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
There is a lot of merit in a proportional voting system. It would do away with the whip system and would also give power to fringe parties such as the greens and liberal democrats (only joking Bill!!!) and perhaps make for more radical government by consensus. There are of course downsides as well. |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
I may just put myself up again at next elections, and actually bother to canvas this time, as I'm always being asked by people to stand. |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
________________________________________________- To all those who read this - Why don't you stand for election. All you need is four things Live or work in Hyndburn, for the past year Ten people willing to sign a piece of paper (this is a lot easier than it sounds). A liking for people A wish to serve. Thats all it takes. You do not have to belong to a party. If you want to know more send me a Private Message |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
last year i voted for the very first time.i am going to be completely honest and i am completly thick about elections and i dnt see the point as i dnt understand? (we should be taught about it in school and not have german language)(another story)
I voted and whats my vote gone to? they say its important and that you get a say but its not really saying anything putting a cross on a piece of paper? im cluelss to it but i only vote just to keep people quiet. :confused: |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
Fortunately, that's not a problem that I have!!! |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
The less tolerant people are, and we are becoming less tolerant , the more politicians feel its best to sit on the fence or pass the buck. :engsmil::engsmil: Up at again at the next elections. Is this in Hyndburn? |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
It's a bit late for begging letters :p
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
It should be about people at local level, not staying faithfull to national political parties |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
Re: Local vs County
If voting for a polition based purely on personality was the norm a lot of them wouldnt be polititions. The comment below is an example of being out of touch.
|
Re: Local vs County
You have to vote for the best you have g gones, if he's not the best for the people then I wouldn't. personally if I was up there and had my vote up there Id vote for a go getter with some fire in their belly , someone that has vision, hope , someone that wants to do things to improve the place, that asks what people think, what they want, then tries to do it, someone that realises that people actually have to live their and that they deserve the best.
Personally from what I've seen thats gayle. |
Re: Local vs County
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com