![]() |
Re: Landmarks
There is a world of difference between progress from living in mud huts to brick buildings and progress by dumping a useless great artifact that serves no purpose in an area of natural beauty.
|
Re: Landmarks
One of my objections to summat else up t'coppie is illustrated perfectly by those two photographs of vandalism.
If the shelter and so called monument are in such a state (which they were not when I was younger) wouldn't putting a panopticon up there only give the vandals something else to wreck? As for Peter Beard, I remember looking at some other things he'd designed and being totally unimpressed. Why an architect? Why not an artist? a sculptor? |
Re: Landmarks
Quote:
or do a vandalised bus shelter and a broken monument make it that natural beaty spot in your eyes? |
Re: Landmarks
Quote:
Secondly the shelter may be vandalised, but unless you are up there it isn't a visible blot on the natural beauty of the Coppice, which some of the designs would have been, particularly the Accrington/Hollywood monstrosity. |
Re: Landmarks
I didn't actually see that one but that space ship one that rawtenstall got is ok, can't you put a matching pink one on the coppice.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com