![]() |
Re: Logic or fallacy?
Just saw the version of the report on TV and there was no mention of the vitamins reaching the eyeballs.
You see Tealeaf you were commenting on what you'd heard on Radio4 not on what I'd posted which was in response to what I'd heard this morning. My point is still the same that if fat in the diet stops certain vitamins from being absorbed it does not follow that fat people are short of those vitamins because fat people do not all consume fats and not all people who consume fats are fat. That's the fallacy. This woman on TV mentioned obesity leading to diabetes but I know more slim diabetics than overweight ones. Maybe the facts there are that the fat ones wouldn't be diabetic if they weren't fat but on the other hand what about all the fat people who aren't diabetic? Sometimes it isn't cause and effect. Sometimes it's just coincidence. |
Re: Logic or fallacy?
[quote=WillowTheWhisp]Just saw the version of the report on TV and there was no mention of the vitamins reaching the eyeballs.
You see Tealeaf you were commenting on what you'd heard on Radio4 not on what I'd posted which was in response to what I'd heard this morning. quote] I think, Willow, you need to change to change your listening & viewing habits pretty fast. |
Re: Logic or fallacy?
[quote=Tealeaf]
Quote:
...and perhaps a little more roughage in your diet will make your mood a little less severe.:D |
Re: Logic or fallacy?
It will turn out to be something or nothing based on a small sample and imput. Unless put down with a least 10 years data covering thousands of people it aint worth tosh.
|
Re: Logic or fallacy?
Quote:
My opening post was referring to the vitamin part of the story that's all and I still say that the conclusion drawn in that part of the report is flawed. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com