![]() |
Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
A report today states that the medical profession recognises that vehicle exhaust fumes are the main cause of asthma. The report goes on to suggest that vehicle exhaust fumes also stunt the growth of the lungs in the young.
This damning report considers that children living within 500 yards of a busy highway are the most at risk. Can I just pat myself on the back just this once because they have confirmed what I have been saying for years and had my words rammed down my throat as motorists tried to defend their polluting ways. Now all you sanctimonious, bigoted, selfish, intolerant, hypocritical non-smokers who campaigned so vociferously against being forced to breathe in second hand tobacco fumes, are you going to launch a similar campaign against the infernal combustion engine? If not why not? |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Dont forget all the factories.
My mum suffers from Ashma bad, when the dairy was in Accrington we lived close by, I remember her having really bad attacks and needing hospital attention af ew times (that breating machine). Once the Dairy shut down, her Ashma improved 80%. Coinsidence? Car manufacturers are trying to be greener, just the technology is expensive at the moment. |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
A dairy equals lots of motor transport coming and going and it is more likely to be the lack of those when the dairy closed down that helped your mum’s asthma rather than the dairy itself. Wot? No non-smokers ready to start an anti car campaign? Didn’t think that there would be any. Come on you non-smokers you were quick to condemn the smoker so admit that cars are killing my grand, great grandchildren and everybody else’s too. Sorry! I forgot! The car is seen as essential so it doesn’t matter if it poisons hundreds of thousands. |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Do you know jambutty you have got me thinking, 15 years ago the Council redirected mainstream traffic from the town centre past our house, and put a roundabout outside my front window, since then I have had three operations for cancer, the last one for lung cancer and I do not smoke! This traffic is non stop 24 hours a day . If there is a Solicitor out there who wants to take my case up get in touch.
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Sorry to read about your illnesses but it certainly points to traffic as the culprit. Although I figure you would have a hard time proving it.
In fact I doubt if any boffin would dare to prove it and even if someone did you can bet your sweet life that the results would get ‘lost’. Imagine the litigation! |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
I don’t think that you can class a dairy as a factory. After all it is just a place where milk is delivered in bulk, bottled and sent out for home delivery and shops. Maybe they had some sort of a boiler for heating the water to sterilise the bottles before use.
There is no doubt that wind direction would play a part but vehicle exhaust fumes tend to keep low to the ground especially in cold weather. |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Is it only private cars you object to because buses can do a fair old bit of polluting or do we condemn everyone to stay at home or only travel as far as they can walk?
That would mean I can get into town but not back home again. :rolleyes: |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
no but they could switch to Eco-Fuel surely if the goverment got off the pot.
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
This eco-fuel. How eco is it? I know it's supposedly non-polluting but I presume it does have some emmisions?
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Sounds like a good idea - how do we go about converting? Can we get a grant? ;)
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
WillowTheWhisp - I use the term cars to mean all infernal combustion engine vehicles. I am well aware that older buses and lorries spew out death from their exhausts at an alarming rate.
I don’t make any proposals about what to do about vehicle pollution, I was just asking those who opposed smoking on the grounds of health to others if they would now put their backs behind a campaign to get rid of lethal vehicle exhaust fumes, which by a strange coincidence also creates health problems in others. I’m not suggesting the banning of cars (I need mine because I have walking difficulties) just a change of fuel. It would appear that hypocrisy rules. Up to right now 84 people have viewed this thread but there have only been 15 replies and some of those are mine. So where are these non-smokers? Why don’t they come in and say their piece? Come on defend the polluting motor vehicle. The technology is available to produce fuel for the infernal combustion engine that doesn’t pollute the atmosphere but that would mean the decline of the petrol/Diesel industry and with the powerful lobby that it has it isn’t going to happen until the last drop of oil is squeezed out of the ground. What would you rather have steeljack – a planet with an atmosphere that kills or a dearer loaf of bread? I would rather pay an extra 50 p for a loaf of bread than be choked to death with vehicle exhaust fumes. And I am sure that I am not alone with that view. |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
Lancashire has a lot more cars now - but less industry. Maybe it all evens itself out one way or another. I was raised with belching chimneys of every description. We lived near the railroad tracks at one point. My baby sister would be out in the backyard in her pram, (catching the few odd rays), and Mum always had to swab out her nose and around her mouth when she was brought back inside because coal dust and grime, etc., would deposit itself on the child as she lay there. Neither one of us has developed any health problems as a result of breathing in all of this junk. I don't discount environmental causes - but some could just be the result of genetics. |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
agree with you, Took lots of people with PHD`s so long to work it out
:confused: :confused: :confused: |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Pollution is obviously a problem and problems are there to be solved and not argued against solving them.
Using bio fuel may well present new problems in that cereal products are used to produce it and thus may cause a flour shortage but corn is not the only vegetable matter that can produce ethanol. All people seem to be doing is making excuses why petrol and Diesel should continue to be used and not embracing the situation and working to resolve it. Like others I lived through the smoky days gone by but there were no near as many vehicles on the road then as there are now. So a comparison doesn’t do much to establish a point. I’m sure that genetics do come into the equation and as has been pointed out, in the ‘good’ old days we were not quite as hygienic as we are today. How else can we explain two siblings where one is as healthy as a horse and the other catches everything going. We lived amongst all the gunge and grew immune to it by exposure. What was that old saying? Something about a peck of dirt. Still no anti-smokers making a contribution to the thread I see! Is there just one ‘ban smoking’ car driving campaigner who whinged and moaned about his/her hair and clothes smelling like an old ashtray after a night out and longed to breathe ‘clean’ air ready to come out of the woodwork and complain about his/her hair and clothes smelling like an old exhaust? 140 people have now read this thread so why no comments from some of them? |
Re: Exhaust Fumes Are To Blame
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com