![]() |
Why isnt this man a terrorist?
now surely if this man was a muslim - he wud've been hung drawn and quartered by now for wanting to shoot blair and posessing explosive chemicals - surely he also should've been arrested under anti-terrorism legislation.
A former British National Party (BNP) candidate who held explosive chemicals in anticipation of a civil war wanted to shoot Tony Blair, a court heard. Robert Cottage, 49, from Colne, Lancashire, pleaded guilty to possession of explosives at the start of his trial at Manchester Crown Court. His wife said he often boasted of wanting to shoot Mr Blair and Lib Dem peer Lord Greaves, the court was told. Mr Cottage denies conspiracy to cause an explosion. A second man, David Jackson, 62, of Nelson, Lancashire, denies both charges under the Explosive Substances Act. |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
thats our government for ya though....pathetic
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
The trial is continuing. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1380013.ece |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Sounds like a terrorist to me. Actually I don't understand why we have to have a separate label. Somebody wants to blow people up for whatever reason or shoot people or whatever then it's the same offence surely isn't it?
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Hell yes I would say he was terrorist.
I agree with Mani if he was muslim he would have been preverbially hung drawn and quarted by the press and Media. |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
By the way Spuggie come the revolution and you will be taken outside and stoned to death if you ever use the word, Quote:
We liberals have a wonderful way with words! :) |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
That makes 90% of british people terrorists |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
i guess hes just an old fashioned british bomber :)
ahhh that takes me back before all ths terrorism crap we used to call people bombers but thats sooo 1980's now we got to call them terrorists |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
I agree with you Mani, if this guy was a muslim, he would have been branded a terrorist.
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
the way i understand it which may or not be correct is that a terrorist is someone who uses terror to make a political standpoint and a bomber is somone who just likes blowing people up
he says he was stock piling because he freared civil war which would not put him in teh category of been a terrorist so until hes convicted of a terrorist act i dont think they will call him a terrorist yep we all know his story is bollox but thats his explination and until teh case finishes we wont know what he is besides a facist waner ( pronounced with a loud K ) |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Better watch all you lot who play war/violence games on computers or consoles or you might be accussed of practicing to be a terrorist. ;)
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
i tried that microsoft flight simulator and apart from crashing a plane into teh ground i wouldnt make a good terrorist at all :D |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
Better watch they dont try and make you the 22nd 911 terrorist based on that. :eek: |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
spuggie
seriously all i ever do now is play golf - tiger woods 2007 cud i be trying any harder not to be asian? *L* |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
if i post a picture of a bucket of whitewash will it offend you ? :D nah better not although you get the humour some might not :rolleyes: |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
However, I totally disagree that if he had been a Muslim he would have been treated any differently. There is admittedly anti-Islamic bias, both in the press, and in the public arena. But there is also the case were Muslim crimes are handled with kid gloves, so as not to offend, and appease the politically correct loby, which is present both in society in general, and the law of the land. A good example of this would be the recent trial of the BNP's leader Nick Griffin on race hate crime charges, following undercover filming by the BBC. The charges came to light, and the Crown Prosecution Service took the case to trial. Griffin was found not guilty. On the other hand we have the very similar story were Channel 4's Dispatches programme secretly filmed Muslim leaders, in British mosques, spouting similar hate filled rhetoric as Griffin did. No charges are to be brought against the people who were filmed coming out with racist, and homophobic garbage. The law of the land should be applicable to everyone, regardless of creed, or colour. This man from Lancashire sounds like a total headcase, and he may or may not be found guilty of these crimes, but do not try to turn this into a case about racism, and how Muslims are a persecuted minority. In my opinion there would be much less unrest in the country, if leaders of the Muslim faith condemed the extremists who are preaching hate and separatism in the name of Islam, from the comfort of a democratic country, Britain, and are being allowed to get away with it law. http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/leg...icle342857.ece http://www.judeoscope.ca/breve.php3?id_breve=3074 |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
and you'd see tony blair or gordon brown sayin this proves that the islamic terrorist threat is real not only for the public but for politicians too hence we need these strict measures in the police force etc
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Both the guys being questioned look total headcases, but wasn't it his wife that informed the police, she must have been convinced that he was going to do something to do that!
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
I agree 100% with that. Everyone should be treated equally. Quote:
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
Sorry, missed this - which idea was this? |
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
That one where we were all going to get wristbands but it sort of fizzled out. I can't remember if you originally thought of it or if that was somebody else - but you were looking into it maybe from a funding point of view.
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
wristbands are sooooooooooooooo last year!! :o
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Yes, I think it was Margaret's idea.
|
Re: Why isnt this man a terrorist?
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com