Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   1st July 2007 (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/1st-july-2007-a-31352.html)

park381 13-06-2007 14:55

1st July 2007
 
The new "No-smoking regulations come in to force, are you in agreement.

lindsay ormerod 13-06-2007 15:11

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Yes I am;because I am a non smoker and I hate smelling of second hand smoke when I get home after being around smokers in an enclosed space. I also don't value having my health compromised by selfish smokers who don't respect my breathing space.
But you smokers also my sympathy as it's obviously a very difficult habit to break.

Kisser 13-06-2007 15:51

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Bring it on - can't wait :) :) :) :)

Lilly 13-06-2007 16:00

Re: 1st July 2007
 
A sledge hammer to crack a nut in my opinion.There was no need for a blanket ban.They could have left it to Landlord's discretion or a designated smoking room equipped with big fans for ventilation would have sufficed.We're stuck with it now though aren't we?Only about 3 weeks left before it comes into force.

Kisser 13-06-2007 16:13

Re: 1st July 2007
 
If it was landlords discretion more pubs could suffer - as which pub would really put no-smoking throughout if a pub up the road allowed smoking. All the smokers would go to the smoking pub, and the landlord may fear this meaning he would feel presured to allow smoking. At least a "blanket ban" means it is out of the landlords hands - he doesnt have to worry about other pubs being more leniant etc.

Also if a room for smokers was the case, pubs without a seperate room would have to accomodate the smokers meaning small pubs could suffer. The full ban means the landlord doesnt have to worry about where the smokers will go - it is out of his or her control.

Obviously there are loads of arguments for and against it- but I think a blanket ban is the better option as there is no confusion as to what is and what isnt allowed - and all pubs are in the same boat.

jedimaster 13-06-2007 16:17

Re: 1st July 2007
 
i totally disagree
seperate areas provides a safe haven for all without taking away the human rights of smokers

Kisser 13-06-2007 16:18

Re: 1st July 2007
 
So how does a pub without a seperate area manage?

shillelagh 13-06-2007 16:25

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Ok i smoke - and i agree with it. Been to Dublin after the ban came in and i liked it. Stood outside with the rest or in the smoking area with the patio heaters and underneath the brollys. Preferred it. You dont smoke as much because you have to get up and stand outside away from your friends.

Kisser 13-06-2007 16:36

Re: 1st July 2007
 
If pubs have seperate areas for the smokers there's the issue of if you go out to the pub with your friends and they all smoke. Do you sit in the non-smoking bit on your own, or sit with your friends in the smoking bit? I have this problem at the moment with my best friend, would love to sit in the non-smoking area of the Greyhound but she and her hubby and his friend all smoke and want to sit in the smoking bit. If its non-smoking throughout, no matter where we go I don't have to feel uncomfortable and know that no matter where we go for the quiz or a drink etc I can breath clean fresh air.

***Mr D*** 13-06-2007 16:42

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Got to agree with it really.

Just need to ban alchol in public places and we on to a winner.:D

Kisser 13-06-2007 16:43

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 434502)
Just need to ban alchol in public places and we on to a winner.:D

A lot of people who I have had this discussion with have said this, and my argument is alcohol doesnt affect other people's health! Unless they get absolutely off their trolley and start fighting of course lol.

park381 13-06-2007 17:10

Re: 1st July 2007
 
A lot of Pubs have applied for planning permission to build "smoking shelters".
All buildings are to display the correct No Smoking sign or risk being fined, that includes churches which is a bit over the top.
The ban has got to be a move in the right direction, just think of all the money HM Gov will loose as people give up the weed.

garinda 13-06-2007 17:33

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Yes I'm ready.

I'm never going out again.:D

Yolanda25 13-06-2007 17:39

Re: 1st July 2007
 
I think its brilliant, i am a smoker and that way it will be easier to stop smoking, nice one

park381 13-06-2007 17:41

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 434515)
Yes I'm ready.

I'm never going out again.:D

That would be a shame, think about it.................give up the weed.........after more years than I would care to remember......I had my last cig......Dec 2005 :eek:

Yolanda25 13-06-2007 17:41

Re: 1st July 2007
 
A lot of people who I have had this discussion with have said this, and my argument is alcohol doesnt affect other people's health! Unless they get absolutely off their trolley and start fighting of course lol.

MMM i think u are wrong on that one im sorry to say but alcohol does affect ur health long term with liver diseases

Kisser 13-06-2007 17:42

Re: 1st July 2007
 
It affects YOUR health if you choose to drink it - but not those around you who don't - unlike smoking...

park381 13-06-2007 17:43

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yolanda25 (Post 434520)
I think its brilliant, i am a smoker and that way it will be easier to stop smoking, nice one

Go to it, give them up.............I did after......**years

grego 13-06-2007 19:19

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Yes, I'm looking forward to going out and not coming home stinking of fags.

cashman 13-06-2007 21:08

Re: 1st July 2007
 
not in favour, but it dont matter, the powers that be will do what they want,when they want as usual, n theres sod all anyone can do about it.:p

katex 13-06-2007 21:39

Re: 1st July 2007
 
I have voted yes on this poll even though I am a heay smoker myself.

The only thing that naffs me off is the fact that it is well known that modern extractor units availble have been proved to carry away the smoke, smell and danger to non-smokers. Only costs, bullying and smug attitudes that have prevented these going ahead.

The one thing I will miss is the 'withdrawing to the lounge with my coffee (eeeks caffeine :D) after a lovely meal in a restaurant' but am looking forward to the socialisation that will be created by the heated patios in the pubs.

Labouring a point yet again I will now campaign to rid the world of such perfumes as Giorgio (award for worst),Kenzo, Paco Rabanne, Moschino, Burberry, Angel, Stella McCartney, Vanilla based and Ghost which has some ingredient which causes me to fell nauseus, physically wretch, wheezy, chesty,sneezing unlimited, dizzy and generally extremely unwell. It also clings to my clothes and can smell it until they are washed. Amazingly, still have this incredible sense of smell. My colleagues at work now know better than to wear such a perfume when in my presence all day. Smell it when in town as people walk past me and wonder what they find so attractive in this obnoxious so called 'delight to their nostrils'.

Seriously, does affect me extremely badly.

Yes, roll on July 1st .. don't mind at all.

Have taken a vow never to comment on this subject again.. just invites the bigots/ganging characteristics in us all.

SPUGGIE J 13-06-2007 22:03

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Lived with it up here for 15 months so nowt new to me. Benifits will show but might take 6 months. :)

katex 13-06-2007 22:11

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J (Post 434719)
Lived with it up here for 15 months so nowt new to me. Benifits will show but might take 6 months. :)

Yeh, was definitely a benefit to me whilst up there in Glasgow few months ago..Exhibition Centre /hotel .. met loads of lovely people whilst chatting/being chatted up :D:D outside. Felt the benefits within 24 hrs. LOL

garinda 13-06-2007 23:24

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 434521)
That would be a shame, think about it.................give up the weed.........after more years than I would care to remember......I had my last cig......Dec 2005 :eek:

My neurologist encourages my habit, by saying it lessons my tremor. In fact I should ask for cigarettes on prescription.:D

I probably will give up one day, but being a contrary Mary, not when I'm expected, or told to.:)

cashman 13-06-2007 23:29

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 434757)

I probably will give up one day, but being a contrary Mary, not when I'm expected, or told to.:)

are we TWINS or what?:D;)

Ber999T 14-06-2007 04:25

Re: 1st July 2007
 
As far as I'm aware there are 3 places that wil not come under this new law and that the affected people will still be allowed to smoke freely and without too many constrants


1. For fear of "more this is against my human (cold turkey) rights" claims the prisons are, I believe, exempt.

2. The clients detained within the walls of the secure Hospitals.

but not the staff I might add.


and because its a case of "Do as I say and not as I do"











3 the House of Commons and the House of Lords



sounds about right

break the law go and have a fag;

go insane have a fag;
MAKE the law go and have a fag!!!!!

WillowTheWhisp 14-06-2007 11:12

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Well there's logic for you. As far as parliament goes it's obviously a case of do as I say not as I do. The other two - what's the justification? Must be especially tough on staff of a prison or secure hospital where the 'clients' (who decided that's what they were?) are permitted to smoke.

garinda 14-06-2007 11:21

Re: 1st July 2007
 
What's going to happen in prisons?

If you are locked in a cell for twenty three hours a day, aren't you allowed to smoke?

I'd better start being good, or at least make sure I'm never caught!:D

Gayle 14-06-2007 11:30

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Well I'm a non smoker and I hate coming home smelling of smoke but I think a blanket ban is a bit too much. I think it will be the death knell for some smaller local pubs.

If a pub serves food then absolutely make it no smoking, if it allows children in then again, absolutely no smoking but if it's a pub where only drinkers go to for their pint after work or lunchtime then I think there should be an application process to allow some pubs to be smoking pubs.

garinda 14-06-2007 11:34

Re: 1st July 2007
 
It is a bit of a strange state of affairs were you can locally go to a number of crack dens in the area, yet from next month you won't be able to have a drink and a cigarette anywhere except in your own home.

Lilly 14-06-2007 15:31

Re: 1st July 2007
 
It's not fair is it? The scum that drink all day,don't contribute anything to society and get violent can carry on doing just that because that's allowed but auntie Ethel can't go in her favourite cafe and have a ciggie with her cup of tea while she chats to her friends as she has done for years.When did anyone ever smoke 10 fags one after the other and then go and kick some innocent person to death? The law has its priorities all wrong.Very unfair.

***Mr D*** 14-06-2007 16:25

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 434977)
It's not fair is it? The scum that drink all day,don't contribute anything to society and get violent can carry on doing just that because that's allowed but auntie Ethel can't go in her favourite cafe and have a ciggie with her cup of tea while she chats to her friends as she has done for years.When did anyone ever smoke 10 fags one after the other and then go and kick some innocent person to death? The law has its priorities all wrong.Very unfair.

That why I said drinking in public should also be banned.

I wonder how many pubs will actually be 100% compliant, As im sure last orders in a lot of pubs is 11,12pm and I have been in a few lock ins.;)

Eric 14-06-2007 16:32

Re: 1st July 2007
 
I voted yes ... even tho' it's not really any of my business. Ontario has had a blanket ban for over a year. After a few months it ceases to be much of an issue. I was a heavy smoker (two packs a day {50** for more years than I care to count). It almost killed me, whenever I feel the urge to light up I look at the scars I have from the surgery. However, I think that rather than punishing the addicts much more effort and cash should be directed at making sure as few people as possible start the habit.

The thing that really bothers me about the issue is the attitude of the "smoking nazis", holier than thou crusaders. With these a**holes smoking becomes a moral issue, smokers to them are somehow not as good (in the moral sense) as non-smokers. This is the wrong attitude. A smoker is an addict to a legal substance, he is not, and should not be treated as, a criminal.

panther 27-06-2007 09:48

Re: 1st July 2007
 
i see that the bus shelter which are enclosed have now gone signs up not to smoke!!
what about phone boxes can you smoke in them?

davo69 27-06-2007 09:54

Re: 1st July 2007
 
if bus shelters or any smoking shelter as three solid sides its against the law

davo69 27-06-2007 09:57

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 434977)
It's not fair is it? The scum that drink all day,don't contribute anything to society and get violent can carry on doing just that because that's allowed but auntie Ethel can't go in her favourite cafe and have a ciggie with her cup of tea while she chats to her friends as she has done for years.When did anyone ever smoke 10 fags one after the other and then go and kick some innocent person to death? The law has its priorities all wrong.Very unfair.

so why should none smokers not have the right to go in the same cafe and not be poisoned no one dies of passive drinking

panther 27-06-2007 09:59

Re: 1st July 2007
 
next you wont be able to smoke in your own home!

davo69 27-06-2007 10:00

Re: 1st July 2007
 
if you have children why not

Mick 27-06-2007 10:02

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Most Pubs have at least two bars/rooms why could they not just have one for smokers and one for non smokers ?

Lilly 27-06-2007 10:05

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davo69 (Post 440681)
so why should none smokers not have the right to go in the same cafe and not be poisoned no one dies of passive drinking

I know you are not poisoned by alcohol because the bloke next to you is having half a lager but when someone who has been drinking all day starts a brawl and finishes up kicking someone to death then that someone has,in effect,died of passive drinking.They've died due to the actions of a drunk and it might not have happened if drink wasn't involved.

Lilly 27-06-2007 10:08

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by panther (Post 440682)
next you wont be able to smoke in your own home!

I've been wondering about that too.How long before your neighbour can sue you because you're having a fag in your garden and the smoke is coming through their open window in the summer?
How long before the house insurance won't insure you for fire if you're a smoker?

Lilly 27-06-2007 10:12

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davo69 (Post 440683)
if you have children why not

At present a lot of adults go to the pub to enjoy a cigarette and a drink but after 1st July they'll probably be staying at home more,smoking at home more.That's not benefitting the kids,at least by smoking in the pub the children were protected from it more than they will be from 1st July.

AccyMad 27-06-2007 10:12

Re: 1st July 2007
 
There was something on the news the other week that Liverpool City Council were to ask their tennants not to smoke in their houses for at least 1/2 an hour to an hour before being visited by council workers! Now that's going a bit far

davo69 27-06-2007 10:12

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 440685)
I know you are not poisoned by alcohol because the bloke next to you is having half a lager but when someone who has been drinking all day starts a brawl and finishes up kicking someone to death then that someone has,in effect,died of passive drinking.They've died due to the actions of a drunk and it might not have happened if drink wasn't involved.

what about children that get nothing because parents spend there money on cigs .it should be down to choice i agree when your old enough to make that choice.if the cafe as signs to say smoking allowed throught the building then thats up to none smokers to go in or not same goes with pubs not being argumentive just two sides

garinda 27-06-2007 10:13

Re: 1st July 2007
 
As of Saturday you won't be able to smoke at the tables outside Annies Cafe in the Victorian Arcade, which is a bit daft, and even though the owner apparently wanted to allow smoking there.

The only place that smokers in Accrington will be able to eat and smoke is at the tables outside the cafe opposite the Town Hall.

Shouldn't be much of a wait for a table on a day like today though.:D

lancsdave 27-06-2007 10:15

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 440689)
There was something on the news the other week that Liverpool City Council were to ask their tennants not to smoke in their houses for at least 1/2 an hour to an hour before being visited by council workers! Now that's going a bit far


Hynburn Homes have also requested you don't smoke in your own house if any of their employees are in the house.

panther 27-06-2007 10:18

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 440692)
Hynburn Homes have also requested you don't smoke in your own house if any of their employees are in the house.

LMAO........this must be a wind up:rolleyes:
what else they want a red carpet!?....:mad:

lancsdave 27-06-2007 10:19

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by panther (Post 440695)
LMAO........this must be a wind up:rolleyes:
what else they want a red carpet!?....:mad:


No wind up :D

panther 27-06-2007 10:23

Re: 1st July 2007
 
well thank god i dont smoke or have a council house, they are now taking the pee pee!

Lilly 27-06-2007 10:25

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 440689)
There was something on the news the other week that Liverpool City Council were to ask their tennants not to smoke in their houses for at least 1/2 an hour to an hour before being visited by council workers! Now that's going a bit far

That's the thing isn't it?It's all going too far.I believe that you won't be able to have a fag in your house if you've got workmen in because it's their workplace,you can't smoke in your car if you're giving a colleague a lift even if they are a smoker too! How that's going to be policed I don't know but why has it been taken to such silly levels?:(
My friend works in a prison and all the inmates can have a fag because prisons are exempt as it's their home but it doesn't apply to the staff.It's all wrong.From this Sunday if you have a fag in a public place you'll be fined,refuse to pay the fine and you'll be chased for it,refuse at all costs to pay the fine and the ultimate punishment for you will be prison.....where you'll be able to smoke to your heart's content:D

Mick 27-06-2007 10:27

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Its the same with rest/nursing homes the residents can smoke all they want but the staff cant smoke .

Lilly 27-06-2007 10:34

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mick (Post 440702)
Its the same with rest/nursing homes the residents can smoke all they want but the staff cant smoke .

I know,I've got another friend who works in a nursing home and she was saying how she normally has a brew and a fag with one particular old lady on her break time but she won't be able to from next week.They'll be able to sit together and drink tea,the lady will still be allowed her fag but my friend won't,even though they'll be sitting next to each other in the same room! Where's the logic in that?:mad:

panther 27-06-2007 10:35

Re: 1st July 2007
 
true mick....exemptions for bedrooms in hotels, and for care homes, hospices and prisons.

panther 27-06-2007 10:39

Re: 1st July 2007
 
i wonder if you can smoke on railway platforms??

lancsdave 27-06-2007 10:47

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by panther (Post 440709)
i wonder if you can smoke on railway platforms??


No

Smoking in English public places will be prohibited from 1 July, bringing the country into line with similar bans in Scotland and Wales, with a blanket ban on lighting up on all 1,900 station concourses, ticket halls, covered and uncovered platforms, footbridges and subways, as well as retail and food outlets.

The legislation will also apply to railway and station offices, canteens and workplace areas covered by the law, although smoking will be allowed on most station forecourts and in uncovered station parks.

panther 27-06-2007 10:52

Re: 1st July 2007
 
only if enclosed!, so you can have a fag in accy railway platform, unless it states no smoking


also taxis cant have there fags anymore

jambutty 27-06-2007 14:47

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Lets get one thing straight – it isn’t a ban on smoking in public places but a ban on smoking in ENCLOSED public spaces or in open spaces where the owner of the public open space declares it a smoke free zone. Hospital grounds, football grounds, railway stations etc.

Just an observation to all those smugly remarking that at long last they can go home without their clothes and hair smelling like an old ashtray. They will now go home with their clothes and hair smelling like an old car exhaust. When are you going to complain about that? If not why not?

Lilly 27-06-2007 15:10

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 440780)
Lets get one thing straight – it isn’t a ban on smoking in public places but a ban on smoking in ENCLOSED public spaces or in open spaces where the owner of the public open space declares it a smoke free zone. Hospital grounds, football grounds, railway stations etc.

Just an observation to all those smugly remarking that at long last they can go home without their clothes and hair smelling like an old ashtray. They will now go home with their clothes and hair smelling like an old car exhaust. When are you going to complain about that? If not why not?

I don't know if there's others wondering the same or if I'm just being a biff but why will people be smelling like old car exhausts?:confused:

Kisser 27-06-2007 15:14

Re: 1st July 2007
 
I dont think I've ever been out and come home smelling of car exhausts - but have definately gone out and come home stinking of fags - god knows what else it has done to my lungs over the years. July 1st - bring it on!!!! :D

jambutty 27-06-2007 15:47

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 440785)
I don't know if there's others wondering the same or if I'm just being a biff but why will people be smelling like old car exhausts?:confused:

Because the alleged clean air that we all breathe is heavily polluted by vehicle exhaust fumes.

You clothes and hair don’t stink of exhaust fumes Kisser because the fag pollutant masked it. Without the smell of tobacco smoke it won’t be long before your clothes and hair will smell like an old exhaust pipe.

Many years ago when my ex-wife worked in a chip shop during the evenings, she would come home smelling like a chip.

Eric 27-06-2007 16:16

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Don't worry about it ... you will get used to it in no time ... the problem that we face in Canada, one that you guys will face soon, is that the initial no smoking legislation is a sort of foot in the door thing ... soon, the smoking nazis will want to ban smoking in your own vehicle if there are children in the car, in apartments, upwind of a non smoker .... and then the even dumber stuff; Corrections Canada has seen fit to ban smoking in Canada's prisons, and leave the staff to put up with flak from the cons, almost all of whom smoke. I don't think the slap on the wrist punishments that will be handed out will deter the guys serving life. And get this beuraucratic mind f**t: the cons can't smoke, but they can still purchase tobacco, legally in the prison canteen!!!!

Eric 27-06-2007 16:18

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Oh, by the way, July 1st 2007 is also Canada's 140th birthday. Happy Canada Day, eh!

panther 27-06-2007 17:11

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 440790)
Because the alleged clean air that we all breathe is heavily polluted by vehicle exhaust fumes.

You clothes and hair don’t stink of exhaust fumes Kisser because the fag pollutant masked it. Without the smell of tobacco smoke it won’t be long before your clothes and hair will smell like an old exhaust pipe.

Many years ago when my ex-wife worked in a chip shop during the evenings, she would come home smelling like a chip.

well i dont stink like a exhaust pipe!, thank you very much!
if i dont go to a friends house (who smokes) i still smell the same as i do when i have been in the shower:D:p

panther 27-06-2007 17:13

Re: 1st July 2007
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 440795)
Oh, by the way, July 1st 2007 is also Canada's 140th birthday. Happy Canada Day, eh!

i never knew that !!:rolleyes:
happy canada day!!!:banjump::wave8:


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com