![]() |
1st July 2007
The new "No-smoking regulations come in to force, are you in agreement.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Yes I am;because I am a non smoker and I hate smelling of second hand smoke when I get home after being around smokers in an enclosed space. I also don't value having my health compromised by selfish smokers who don't respect my breathing space.
But you smokers also my sympathy as it's obviously a very difficult habit to break. |
Re: 1st July 2007
Bring it on - can't wait :) :) :) :)
|
Re: 1st July 2007
A sledge hammer to crack a nut in my opinion.There was no need for a blanket ban.They could have left it to Landlord's discretion or a designated smoking room equipped with big fans for ventilation would have sufficed.We're stuck with it now though aren't we?Only about 3 weeks left before it comes into force.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
If it was landlords discretion more pubs could suffer - as which pub would really put no-smoking throughout if a pub up the road allowed smoking. All the smokers would go to the smoking pub, and the landlord may fear this meaning he would feel presured to allow smoking. At least a "blanket ban" means it is out of the landlords hands - he doesnt have to worry about other pubs being more leniant etc.
Also if a room for smokers was the case, pubs without a seperate room would have to accomodate the smokers meaning small pubs could suffer. The full ban means the landlord doesnt have to worry about where the smokers will go - it is out of his or her control. Obviously there are loads of arguments for and against it- but I think a blanket ban is the better option as there is no confusion as to what is and what isnt allowed - and all pubs are in the same boat. |
Re: 1st July 2007
i totally disagree
seperate areas provides a safe haven for all without taking away the human rights of smokers |
Re: 1st July 2007
So how does a pub without a seperate area manage?
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Ok i smoke - and i agree with it. Been to Dublin after the ban came in and i liked it. Stood outside with the rest or in the smoking area with the patio heaters and underneath the brollys. Preferred it. You dont smoke as much because you have to get up and stand outside away from your friends.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
If pubs have seperate areas for the smokers there's the issue of if you go out to the pub with your friends and they all smoke. Do you sit in the non-smoking bit on your own, or sit with your friends in the smoking bit? I have this problem at the moment with my best friend, would love to sit in the non-smoking area of the Greyhound but she and her hubby and his friend all smoke and want to sit in the smoking bit. If its non-smoking throughout, no matter where we go I don't have to feel uncomfortable and know that no matter where we go for the quiz or a drink etc I can breath clean fresh air.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Got to agree with it really.
Just need to ban alchol in public places and we on to a winner.:D |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
A lot of Pubs have applied for planning permission to build "smoking shelters".
All buildings are to display the correct No Smoking sign or risk being fined, that includes churches which is a bit over the top. The ban has got to be a move in the right direction, just think of all the money HM Gov will loose as people give up the weed. |
Re: 1st July 2007
Yes I'm ready.
I'm never going out again.:D |
Re: 1st July 2007
I think its brilliant, i am a smoker and that way it will be easier to stop smoking, nice one
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
A lot of people who I have had this discussion with have said this, and my argument is alcohol doesnt affect other people's health! Unless they get absolutely off their trolley and start fighting of course lol.
MMM i think u are wrong on that one im sorry to say but alcohol does affect ur health long term with liver diseases |
Re: 1st July 2007
It affects YOUR health if you choose to drink it - but not those around you who don't - unlike smoking...
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Yes, I'm looking forward to going out and not coming home stinking of fags.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
not in favour, but it dont matter, the powers that be will do what they want,when they want as usual, n theres sod all anyone can do about it.:p
|
Re: 1st July 2007
I have voted yes on this poll even though I am a heay smoker myself.
The only thing that naffs me off is the fact that it is well known that modern extractor units availble have been proved to carry away the smoke, smell and danger to non-smokers. Only costs, bullying and smug attitudes that have prevented these going ahead. The one thing I will miss is the 'withdrawing to the lounge with my coffee (eeeks caffeine :D) after a lovely meal in a restaurant' but am looking forward to the socialisation that will be created by the heated patios in the pubs. Labouring a point yet again I will now campaign to rid the world of such perfumes as Giorgio (award for worst),Kenzo, Paco Rabanne, Moschino, Burberry, Angel, Stella McCartney, Vanilla based and Ghost which has some ingredient which causes me to fell nauseus, physically wretch, wheezy, chesty,sneezing unlimited, dizzy and generally extremely unwell. It also clings to my clothes and can smell it until they are washed. Amazingly, still have this incredible sense of smell. My colleagues at work now know better than to wear such a perfume when in my presence all day. Smell it when in town as people walk past me and wonder what they find so attractive in this obnoxious so called 'delight to their nostrils'. Seriously, does affect me extremely badly. Yes, roll on July 1st .. don't mind at all. Have taken a vow never to comment on this subject again.. just invites the bigots/ganging characteristics in us all. |
Re: 1st July 2007
Lived with it up here for 15 months so nowt new to me. Benifits will show but might take 6 months. :)
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
I probably will give up one day, but being a contrary Mary, not when I'm expected, or told to.:) |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
As far as I'm aware there are 3 places that wil not come under this new law and that the affected people will still be allowed to smoke freely and without too many constrants
1. For fear of "more this is against my human (cold turkey) rights" claims the prisons are, I believe, exempt. 2. The clients detained within the walls of the secure Hospitals. but not the staff I might add. and because its a case of "Do as I say and not as I do" 3 the House of Commons and the House of Lords sounds about right break the law go and have a fag; go insane have a fag; MAKE the law go and have a fag!!!!! |
Re: 1st July 2007
Well there's logic for you. As far as parliament goes it's obviously a case of do as I say not as I do. The other two - what's the justification? Must be especially tough on staff of a prison or secure hospital where the 'clients' (who decided that's what they were?) are permitted to smoke.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
What's going to happen in prisons?
If you are locked in a cell for twenty three hours a day, aren't you allowed to smoke? I'd better start being good, or at least make sure I'm never caught!:D |
Re: 1st July 2007
Well I'm a non smoker and I hate coming home smelling of smoke but I think a blanket ban is a bit too much. I think it will be the death knell for some smaller local pubs.
If a pub serves food then absolutely make it no smoking, if it allows children in then again, absolutely no smoking but if it's a pub where only drinkers go to for their pint after work or lunchtime then I think there should be an application process to allow some pubs to be smoking pubs. |
Re: 1st July 2007
It is a bit of a strange state of affairs were you can locally go to a number of crack dens in the area, yet from next month you won't be able to have a drink and a cigarette anywhere except in your own home.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
It's not fair is it? The scum that drink all day,don't contribute anything to society and get violent can carry on doing just that because that's allowed but auntie Ethel can't go in her favourite cafe and have a ciggie with her cup of tea while she chats to her friends as she has done for years.When did anyone ever smoke 10 fags one after the other and then go and kick some innocent person to death? The law has its priorities all wrong.Very unfair.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
I wonder how many pubs will actually be 100% compliant, As im sure last orders in a lot of pubs is 11,12pm and I have been in a few lock ins.;) |
Re: 1st July 2007
I voted yes ... even tho' it's not really any of my business. Ontario has had a blanket ban for over a year. After a few months it ceases to be much of an issue. I was a heavy smoker (two packs a day {50** for more years than I care to count). It almost killed me, whenever I feel the urge to light up I look at the scars I have from the surgery. However, I think that rather than punishing the addicts much more effort and cash should be directed at making sure as few people as possible start the habit.
The thing that really bothers me about the issue is the attitude of the "smoking nazis", holier than thou crusaders. With these a**holes smoking becomes a moral issue, smokers to them are somehow not as good (in the moral sense) as non-smokers. This is the wrong attitude. A smoker is an addict to a legal substance, he is not, and should not be treated as, a criminal. |
Re: 1st July 2007
i see that the bus shelter which are enclosed have now gone signs up not to smoke!!
what about phone boxes can you smoke in them? |
Re: 1st July 2007
if bus shelters or any smoking shelter as three solid sides its against the law
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
next you wont be able to smoke in your own home!
|
Re: 1st July 2007
if you have children why not
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Most Pubs have at least two bars/rooms why could they not just have one for smokers and one for non smokers ?
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
How long before the house insurance won't insure you for fire if you're a smoker? |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
There was something on the news the other week that Liverpool City Council were to ask their tennants not to smoke in their houses for at least 1/2 an hour to an hour before being visited by council workers! Now that's going a bit far
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
As of Saturday you won't be able to smoke at the tables outside Annies Cafe in the Victorian Arcade, which is a bit daft, and even though the owner apparently wanted to allow smoking there.
The only place that smokers in Accrington will be able to eat and smoke is at the tables outside the cafe opposite the Town Hall. Shouldn't be much of a wait for a table on a day like today though.:D |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
Hynburn Homes have also requested you don't smoke in your own house if any of their employees are in the house. |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
what else they want a red carpet!?....:mad: |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
No wind up :D |
Re: 1st July 2007
well thank god i dont smoke or have a council house, they are now taking the pee pee!
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
My friend works in a prison and all the inmates can have a fag because prisons are exempt as it's their home but it doesn't apply to the staff.It's all wrong.From this Sunday if you have a fag in a public place you'll be fined,refuse to pay the fine and you'll be chased for it,refuse at all costs to pay the fine and the ultimate punishment for you will be prison.....where you'll be able to smoke to your heart's content:D |
Re: 1st July 2007
Its the same with rest/nursing homes the residents can smoke all they want but the staff cant smoke .
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
true mick....exemptions for bedrooms in hotels, and for care homes, hospices and prisons.
|
Re: 1st July 2007
i wonder if you can smoke on railway platforms??
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
No Smoking in English public places will be prohibited from 1 July, bringing the country into line with similar bans in Scotland and Wales, with a blanket ban on lighting up on all 1,900 station concourses, ticket halls, covered and uncovered platforms, footbridges and subways, as well as retail and food outlets. The legislation will also apply to railway and station offices, canteens and workplace areas covered by the law, although smoking will be allowed on most station forecourts and in uncovered station parks. |
Re: 1st July 2007
only if enclosed!, so you can have a fag in accy railway platform, unless it states no smoking
also taxis cant have there fags anymore |
Re: 1st July 2007
Lets get one thing straight – it isn’t a ban on smoking in public places but a ban on smoking in ENCLOSED public spaces or in open spaces where the owner of the public open space declares it a smoke free zone. Hospital grounds, football grounds, railway stations etc.
Just an observation to all those smugly remarking that at long last they can go home without their clothes and hair smelling like an old ashtray. They will now go home with their clothes and hair smelling like an old car exhaust. When are you going to complain about that? If not why not? |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
|
Re: 1st July 2007
I dont think I've ever been out and come home smelling of car exhausts - but have definately gone out and come home stinking of fags - god knows what else it has done to my lungs over the years. July 1st - bring it on!!!! :D
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
You clothes and hair don’t stink of exhaust fumes Kisser because the fag pollutant masked it. Without the smell of tobacco smoke it won’t be long before your clothes and hair will smell like an old exhaust pipe. Many years ago when my ex-wife worked in a chip shop during the evenings, she would come home smelling like a chip. |
Re: 1st July 2007
Don't worry about it ... you will get used to it in no time ... the problem that we face in Canada, one that you guys will face soon, is that the initial no smoking legislation is a sort of foot in the door thing ... soon, the smoking nazis will want to ban smoking in your own vehicle if there are children in the car, in apartments, upwind of a non smoker .... and then the even dumber stuff; Corrections Canada has seen fit to ban smoking in Canada's prisons, and leave the staff to put up with flak from the cons, almost all of whom smoke. I don't think the slap on the wrist punishments that will be handed out will deter the guys serving life. And get this beuraucratic mind f**t: the cons can't smoke, but they can still purchase tobacco, legally in the prison canteen!!!!
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Oh, by the way, July 1st 2007 is also Canada's 140th birthday. Happy Canada Day, eh!
|
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
if i dont go to a friends house (who smokes) i still smell the same as i do when i have been in the shower:D:p |
Re: 1st July 2007
Quote:
happy canada day!!!:banjump::wave8: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com