![]() |
Blackmail at the Palace
So then, which one of our beloved Windsors has been up to hanky-panky and had a snort of summat illegal?
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
I think it may be someone who isn't even listed on the poll.
The same person some of you might have been told about when I've had too much to drink, and who I 'met' at a party in the eighties.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Coke, and a Royal being fellated, allegedly, and all on film?
I'd have thought they'd have been after more than fifty grand.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
£50.000 grand for smut on the royals is small change, it's a pure diversion to draw attention away from the ongoing scandal about Lady Diana's assasination, a 'wet' job or sanction that any fool can see through. This will be some minor minion caught bending on Clapham Common with his pants round his ankles.
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
would that be Eddy then Gary? or Andrew? i reckon Eddy myself
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
Well Folks, according to Gary someones got hold of a vid of someone blowing a Corgi............:D I think it's got to the Phil the Greek, after all the Queen would never go down on her knees.......:o |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Strange isnt it how quickly the men have been put in custody and charged. If i blackmailed gary with a video of him having sexy time with a lady it wouldnt be as quick would it lol.
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
if someone videod me having sexy time with a lady I would want a copy !!
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
Although there is a ban in the UK on naming the royal involved, I have my friend Milly scouring the Italian press for a name, as they are much more liberal at spilling the beans. As for my little dalliance, Prince Edward!!! I might sue, for such a slander...I was way out of his league!:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Have I misunderstood :confused: - I thought this was a liasion between 2 men
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
No one knows the gender of the aide. Could be a relative of Monica Lewinsky, for all we know!:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
Never judge a book by a cover, even when that cover is an attractive pink colour. Not that it's anyone's business but my own, but the last three people I've 'known', all this year, have been of the female pursuasion, and I do know that revealing this might mean I have to send back my pink triangle badge, and my rainbow flag, to San Francisco.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Come on gary just a bit of fun sorry if you took offence none intended.
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
It makes me laugh, I've had more girls than old Tealeaf's had new glasses and hair restorers.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
I don't really care which member of the royal family this was, bisexuality and drug taking have been part of that family's history for generations so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. The queen's uncle George, Duke of Kent, was a prime example.
What I wonder is, how did all this come to be taped? |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
The last time a member of the royal family was blackmailed was when the future Edward VII, had visited, and then wrote letters to, two common prostitutes, and who then tried to extort money for the letters safe return.
Who'd have thought! The whole family is morally corrupt, and they should be deported back to Germany at the earliest convenience.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
I seem to be the only one who voted 'Charlie', and now it seems more likely (from later news) to be Edward.
I voted Charlie because of the audio tape that Paul Burrows recovered from Diana's effects and which was the cause of the police raid on his house - remember? |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
i have to agree with ian
seems more likely to be a diversion away from the di inquest more so if we are to be given new information by the press boys in france ? :cool: |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
At the end of the day who cares, I think we should find a blood relative of the last Celtic Kings and put them on the Throne.
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Strange how no one has touched on the sentence possibilities.
15 years anyone? After all it is a felony against a royal and is much more serious than an old man being beaten up and blinded in one eye that got the villain a 3 years supervision order. Or will it get swept under the carpet and the police find something else to charge the two guys with? |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Why is Harry on the list ? thought the news reports were saying it was a Royal who was involved , not some ginger headed cuckoo :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
Thank you. My first act as your new King will be to make you court jester.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
its funny how most of you are slagging the royal family off,as being german or queers etc,i for one like having a monarcy as opposed to a republic etc,and as for them being german,this dates back to the reign of queen victoria,who married prince albert of saxe coburg, this all changed with george Vth who fearing public outcry after the great war changed the surname to WINDSOR after their castle residence in the town of the same name,since then the only monarch to be born after the change and in this country is our current monarch H.M Queen Elizabeth the 2nd.And yes i am proud to have a royal family and i am a monarchist,GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
I am a republican and proud of that too
Republic | What we believe |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
good on you margaret,at least you are honest,and you are entitled to your views, as is the democratic right of every one in this country,what do you think of the u.k as a possible republic ?
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Apparently a British royalty expert named the person involved last night on Fox News in the States.
Whilst Googling, to try and find the name, which I didn't, up popped this thread on page three of the world wide web.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
The German newspaper: Bild.de has apparently released the name of the royal, as it is not "restricted under British Law" have been on the website, then realised I can't read German! lol.
It has been said though that is not a senior royal. It will probably turn out to be the 29th Earl of Goodness Knows Where!!! |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
...and all without having to resort to pay for company, unlike some.;) |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
'...if a website in the UK reprinted the information from a foreign website, it would again find itself with legal problems.'
Scotsman.com News - UK - Web weakens secrecy order over royal 'blackmail' Will Tealeaf go to prison for starting this thread, if he's named here?:rolleyes: |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
news reports in the US and Australia are stating the "Royal" as being 'Lord' Lindley , son of Princess Margaret
AdelaideNow... Queen's nephew centre of scandal |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
I bet he got the coke from his mum.
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Not quite a hairdressers son, but still..... Blah!!
Why are the Royals so bothered about protecting his identity you always find out these things and to be quite honest with you I don't really care, it may be a bit more interesting if it was a senior royal though!:p |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
Well I never. There were always rumors about his father. Apparently when someone asked Princess Margaret, whilst in Mustique, how the Queen was, she replied 'which one, my mother, my sister, or my husband?' :D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
So who will be prosecuted for naming him? Steeljack is safe in America, so Tealeaf will probably be banged up.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Now its been on here it will be in the Observer Friday
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
Quote:
They're always a little slow with their scoops.:D |
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
This topic does seem apt in a world where millions masturbate (sorry for the alliteration) each day in front of their webcams ... what is the world cumming to? (the question is rhetorical).
|
Re: Blackmail at the Palace
an italian news paper has named the royal involved just read it
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com