![]() |
13yr old boy falls
Apprently broke his legs after TRESSPASSING on the old commercial building. What a shame eh.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
He'll probably sue somebody.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Id sue his family for any damage.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Was surprised there wasn't a thread on this Blackburn Road was blocked off and the firebrigade were lowering him down when I was round that way.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
there but fer the grace of god i say, used to love old buildings when i was a kid, was a great adventure, until one night a kid that used to come down, fell off the roof of the hippodrome into ellison st n was killed. its what lads do alexs.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Seems as if our Alexs was the most well behaved child ever, hope the lad is okay
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Occupiers Liability Act 1984 creates liability of land owners for trespassers injuries on their land.
If the land is dangerous AND accessible then why shouldn't they be held liable for it? Any dangerous land should either be secured and/or sign posted about the dangers efficiently so that it is clear that trespassers accept liability for their own risks. If there was a hole in a fence somewhere and your kids climbed into it and broke their legs I'm sure you'd sue over it too, I know I would. If this lads done something similar then I hope he does sue. Why should land owners get away with things like that? |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
A presentation on this area of law was what got me into university, I find it very interesting. Funnily enough I made a joke similar to the woman who is suing over the cows, except I use the example of pecking chickens.
I wouldn't like to represent her because the Animal Act 1971 comes into play and there is a law saying that an animals behaviour has to be seen as dangerous and predictable for the land owner to be held responsible, and of course the damage has to be sufficient, and being tupped by a cow certainly isn't! However being able to get into a dangerous building is in my eyes worthy of a strong case, and I would most certainly take up that one :p Of course I love a challenge, so bring on the cow case lol. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Interesting... she may actually win that, though I think 1 million is a little excessive! At the end of the day, the lawyer with the best story wins :D I find land law very interesting! Obviously the cows were likely to be aggressive at the time she got injured, and there isn't any reason why the farmer wouldn't know that... either side could win that case. I think the boy trespassing case is MUCH more straight forward, unless he actually had to force entry into the premises. There is never a straight forward yes or no answer to law, if there was then we'd use computers to give us the answer. Generally I think our law is a good one, though there are some patchy areas. Trespass to land is quite interesting though! |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
"Boys will be boys" so they should suffer the consequences of their actions........not expect a big payout because they have been stupid.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Before I get jumped on (for voicing my opinion) the owners of the properties in a dangerous state should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.........hope that covers my back.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Theres been 4-5 lads and agirl in there all week nicking the scrap copper piping and wire, if they get hurt serves um right:)
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
It appears that this day and age there are no such things as accidents, there is always some one to blame. Only this week there was an item on TV news regarding broken roads and footpaths, councils are now unable to do all the repairs to roads and paths because they ar paying out so much compo, its the big catch 22 position. When you consider how much tax motorists pay on road tax and petrol duty our roads are a disgrace and this is not a swipe at the present government its been going on for years, its time money raised on these taxes were ring fenced and has to be spent on road improvements, or is it all part of the big plan to get every body off the roads and on public transport:eek:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
There is scaffolding round the building!! Wonder if thirteen year olds can claim they didn't know it was dangerous to climb up it:rolleyes: Or maybe to keep them safe it should be taken down every night;)
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Lad was somewhere he knew he shouldn't be, his fault woman with cow, this is a 1/2 tonne 'wild animal'. her stupid fault for being in its home. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
(quote jaysay) this is not a swipe at the present government
Can i frame this please! :D:D:D The law should be cleared up once and for all with these things, I hope the lad is okay, but, he shouldnt have been there, if there are repairs required or measures necessary to keep people out, then the firm should be prosecuted, if the kid broke in, or is there theiving, then he should be prosecuted, injured or not, the firms should also display no trespassing signs just to cover thier backsides. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
We have a thread which covered 'trespass' when we discussed the rights and wrongs of those cranks who 'explore' derelict buildings and take photos.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
The law is based on common sense, so any lawyer that tried to apply common sense in court would likely lose their case.
You elect the MP's, not the lawyers alone, and then they make the laws, so who is really to blame? |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
It was designed specifically to make things like railways liable for children wandering through holes in fences on to tracks and things, and why shouldn't they be held liable for that damage to someone when they are expected to keep their land as secure as possible to avoid injury to the public? If it was your child dead on the railway, you would want justice. No amount of money would make it better, but this law is designed to deter land owners from have unsecured dangerous land that may harm people. This law doesn't just protect those who immorally trespass onto land with the intent to commit crime, it never was intended for that, it was intended to protect the majority of trespassers who are innocently trespassing and have been injured. I wouldn't stand by a law that in practice was ineffective, hence why I stand strongly by this one as it has done a lot of good in the past. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
The kid shouldnt have been on the building in the first place!
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Everyone says claims like these are wrong until it is themselves or their own kids hurt and then all of a sudden all these left wing ethical whingers suddenly go all capitalist with the pound signs flashing in their eyes.
Everyone wants money, would you really not sue if it was you? I know I could use a few extra grand in my bank account. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
He could sue and pay for an education, or put it in savings and use it to put a deposit on a house in the future. Why not gain from the misery? I'm not a lawyer yet, so don't treat me like one. I am a student with no money, and yes, money does often motivate me. Does that make me a bad person? How many people do the lottery every week in the hope of winning millions? People NEED money, its not even a case of just WANTING it. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
the boy you all talkin about is the son of my friend, yeah u all rite, the same way i feel,that kids shoudnt been on that building on the 1st place, at 13 im sure u know tht it is wrong to go in places like that, but there u go, like someone said earlier, boys will be boys
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
"But there is one way in this country in which all men are created equal-there is one human institution that makes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller, the stupid man the equal of an Einstein, and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. That institution, gentlemen, is a court."
- Harper Lee, To Kill A Mockingbird Anyone who believes the above quote in this day and age truely has ones head up ones backside!! Best Regards - Taggy |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
hope the lads ok , years ago a friend of the family fell through pilkingtons bus depot roof and was in a bad way for a while , luckily his head just missed an object that would have killed him for sure, i dont think he went back up on a roof for a while either
there used to be derelect buildings where aldi used to be and all the kids used to play in them and on the roofs,teenagers especialy boys like to explore and occasionaly some get hurt its a fact of life and shoulnt be sueable whats that old saying if you fall off that roof and break both your legs dont come running to me |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
theres a lot of money to be made out of getting the guilty to walk out of court free just look at the OJ simpson trial ( younger readers dont worry marge isnt dead ) his solicitor became the hottest tallent in america and made millions out of the case he won even though he knew simpson was guilty as sin he also dragged decent peoples reputations through the gutter by branding them racists and hurt a lot of peoples lifes and careers |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Keep out of other peoples property next time then you wont get hurt will you! Its your own fault and if there is damage to the building caused by you id sue you or your parents for it. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Nice guys finish last.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Thats right blazey, to a degree, but it is also the reason I have many happy customers in Accrington, and travel a fair way on my reputation, I will never be rich, but can sleep nights and will surely go to heaven when I die, as jaysay said earlier, it is very nice to do work you really enjoy, and its a privelage to be paid for it too. It possibly wont be a nice guy who owns the factory, the lad may well be a nice kid, but he could also have been a dead kid, through his own stupidity, the biggest fault the building owner has in this case is perhaps lack of signposting and maybe a lack of maintenence, but if it is derelict, it aint earning him any money.
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
thats the way the world goes ;) |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
(ops she does now after the stupid git nearly killed himself) another idea would be for parents to pay the bill maybe that way it would make them keep a better eye on their off springs...... |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Who is at fault though for not installing the signs, the farmer or whoever says that footpath is a safe public right of way? Also if she did wonder off the public footpath whoose fault is that? I don't think the farmer should have to signpost a path which is not in reality his. If it was his he could close it off when it is not safe to use, he can not close the footpath as it is a public right of way. If he can not close of the path when it is dangerous to use then he is in effect being denied the use of his own land. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
I haven't studied land law yet, at least not in any depth, so I do not know which result is likely. Will just have to wait and see. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Thats the last time I make a serious post on here :p:D |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
One of the first things we're taught in law school is that there is no such thing as a wrong answer, just a answer that isn't backed up with evidence and sources. I can give you all the relevant law on this point, but no cases, and no doubt someone would say 'its bad law' when in fact this law isn't bad at all, its just misused. The law is due to change I believe on trespassing to give rights back to the land owner regarding illegal trespassers, but I'm unsure whether its happened yet because its not something I've been following. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
The law should be 'trespassers may be shot'
|
Re: 13yr old boy falls
Quote:
Who needs fox hunting when we can shoot children instead? What a brilliant idea, can't believe I didnt think of it. |
Re: 13yr old boy falls
And ya call me sarcastic:rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com