![]() |
Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
Not sure where I should have posted this, guess it will get moved to the appropriate section.
The blaze in the tunnel this afternoon -Channel Tunnel shut after blaze - was apparently caused by a lorry carrying phenol that had overturned on the train. I’ve never seen one of these freight trains but can a lorry actually overturn while on the train, I mean is there actually enough physical space for it to do so. A lorry has to be about the same width as a train. |
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
Now that has put me off going through the tunnel and Busman doesn't do ferries so it looks like fly and hire.
|
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
In order to allay public fears, they may well need to re-arrange the timetable so that passenger trains are never in the tunnel at the same time as freight.
|
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
The overturning of a lorry on the train just doesn’t sound plausible to me. Perhaps a different tale will come out given time.
|
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
its actually the second time, a fire on a freight train in tunnel, last was in 96, the good news is, the safety procedures worked n no-one seriously injured, the service tunnel obviously does its job, certainly would not put me off, ya go when yer numbers up, its that simple.:)
|
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
Quote:
oops my bad it says blaze :o |
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
Those trains are massive!!! its like a carpark in there lol..... Ive been on twice (obviously,there and back lol) the thing stopped for half an hour while we were on, scared the hell outta us!
|
Re: Channel Tunnel shut after blaze
Quote:
In any case are lorries not secured in some way to stop roll forward or back in case the hand brake fails? Maybe they meant “tip over” rather than “overturn”. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com