![]() |
Every Year It's The Same.
Here we are again, at the climax of Children in need, it's Friday, Sir Terence will yet again be encouraging people to make complete fools of themselves all in the aid of Charity.
Now hang on, before you start sharpening your axes in preparation to cut me down to size, let me first of all state, I am all for helping children. However this year will be the same as last year and all the years back to the beginning of this farce. spoken with that cheeky little lilt of his Sir Terry will be cajoling us all to beat the amount we donated last year, get out your credit cards and pay until it hurts, lets make this a great amount that we need. Why do we need it? Children are still starving in Africa, children are still dying of neglect here, it's not more money we need, It's, more compassion, more care, more love. Yes I do agree, let's make this a record breaking year for 'Children In Need', let's all actually give a damn! |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
I agree with whats been said about helping the children,
but how much of the money collected, actually gets to them, what with all the bribes and backhanders, tyrants loading their pockets, bigshots administering the funds, armed insurgents creating road blocks, and looting supplies, etc etc. Retlaw. |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
I can't feel quite the same about it since I learned that Mr Wogan gets paid for his charity stint.
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Done a bit tonight with the quiz at cricket club , raised £150, Boots does loads too, it's a good cause.:)
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
One thing in that article annoys me - in 2005 he was paid £800,000 for his Radio 2 program. How can that be good value for money? |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
well it does say in the past he has donated things fer auction fer em,......like his tie.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
You can throw as much money as you like at Africa but it will not make one bit of difference. History tells us that,Until they stop killing themselves there will be no end to the suffering. Rant over.:hidewall::hidewall: |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
All BBC employees appearing in this event get paid. It is part of their contract.
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
His co-hosts, Natasha Kaplinsky, Eamonn Holmes and Fearne Cotton etc., are, or have been employed by the B.B.C., and did the event for free. Wogan is the only celeb paid for Children In Need | Mail Online |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
...then I suggest you admit you were wrong.;):D
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Garinda, please give us a breakdown of the the £1.2million. The BBC is an organisation that cannot even be trusted with allowing children to name a pet on it's flagship kiddies programme. Do you really think for one moment that payments are not being made to these celebrity employees? Get out of Ossy and into the real world.
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
If they see they need paying for a fund raising event like this, then they are not they type of person that should be hosting something like Children In Need
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
The employees who don't 'appear' in the show, such as producers, researchers, electricans, wardrobe assistants, etc. etc., will be paid. For seven hours of television it may be the case that the production costs are actually less than that of a normal Friday's television. After all Jonathon Ross gets paid £6 million per year, which when costed out per hour, which is Friday night show was, and taking into account his other B.B.C. shows, works out very costly. Plus there's the fees for his Four Puffs, hospitality and fees for his guests, and there's still another six hours to account for. Children in Need might actually be a cheap night for the Beeb. It certainly looks cheap.:D |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
The realism was just too much to bear. |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Take a look on Children in Need website.
To summarise Every penny raised goes towards helping disadvantaged children. They invest money and that income is used for operating costs. Last year they raised £37m. BBC - Children in Need - About Us - Who You've Helped |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
Which raises the question just how much did Geldof contribute in cash out of his own pocket? And all the stars making those records. How much cash did they give? Oh! I know! They gave their time and voices – so that’s alright then. And Lenny Henry and all the others encouraging us to buy red noses? What was their cash contribution? Prince Charles is patron of a number of charities but just how much of his own cash does he contribute? The point that I am making is that it is all very well these celebrities encouraging the general public to give, give and give but they too should be seen to be giving cash not just their time. |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
I think the idea is that their time costs money but they dont charge for it.......
Its like an orchestra/choir playing outside a supermarket to collect money for charity at christmas... |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
A starving child in Africa cannot use this time and expertise to buy some food. |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
People are more likely to give money to the charity when prompted to by their favourite celeb
If you went in tv and asked people to donate money to africa i doubt anyone would bother, its different when its someone famous.... you also get something such as a song/show from the celebs as well.. |
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
Quote:
|
Re: Every Year It's The Same.
As some one who has worked for both local and national charities, I have to say the local charities are more fulfilling. I got more pleasure as secretary of the Ossy Youth Support Group in the late 80s early 90s than acting as secretary for the Hyndburn branch of The National Asthma Campaign (now Asthma UK) The local charity was about raising money and awareness for young people, something that actually cost all the members money out of their own pockets. The NAC being a national charity had rules and regs, with nearly all money raised having to go to the London head office. The fact the officers in London were on salaries to run the charity didn't really sit well with me, I would have much rather local people benefit from the money we raised.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com