![]() |
No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
If you don't fancy forking out the £139.50 for a television licence, that funds the B.B.C., you can join the growing army of refuseniks who aren't paying for the licence, in the hope of being taken to court by the TVL, who collect the levy on behalf of the Beeb.
Strangely the B.B.C. seem reluctant to prosecute theses people, including Noel Edmonds, and Charles Moore of the Spectator, because it fears they will become 'martyrs'. Apparently there are 2,000 people watching the box without a licence, all apparently free to do so without the fear of prosecution. BBC shies from fight with licence rebels - Times Online Is Mr. Blobby about to bring about the biggest change in television history for many years?:rolleyes: |
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
We need a licence ????
:) . |
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
must be n shortage of 'martyrs' in accy? every few months theres n abundance of dodgers in the observer, n they certainly aint.:D
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Quote:
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
It seems to help if you're a famous non-payer.;)
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Quote:
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
I actually wont have a TV now on principle. Haven’t had one for over 4 years and don’t miss it a bit. I have my Mac and the internet for all the news I need, plus any games and I would much rather spend the few spare hours I have reading rather than watch the absolute tripe that gets put on TV. I’m not in the slightest bit interested in who can dance or sing, how much talent Britain doesn’t have, cops chasing criminals or how some London snooty is re-wallpapering someone’s home. TV rots the mind and adds to the apathy of the masses.
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
The TV License is a law thing. We are required by law to hold a valid TV license if we watch TV programmes on any equipment capable of receiving TV programmes broadcast by any means. Whether a person actually watches any programme or its quality or personal interest is irrelevant.
As a law we are bound to conform and those who do not should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law without fear or favour. Sadly that appears not to be the case. I would point out to MikeSz and others with a similar view that one person’s crap is another person’s interesting programme. I would agree that from my perspective there is a load of dross on TV but I have mastered the remote control and on/off switch and select from the numerous channels what interests me. It’s called “choice” and we can all exercise that choice. TV doesn’t rot the mind unless you let it. There are multitudes of informative programmes. Sadly the majority follow each other like sheep and watch what most people watch because if they didn’t they wouldn’t have anything to gossip about the next day at work. |
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
It's interesting how the licence fee is a flat rate. Not disimilar to how the poll tax was (other than the option to opt out).
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Quote:
Odd that.;) |
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Quote:
:p |
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Quote:
|
Re: No TV licence required for 'martyrs'.
Just a few corrections for this:
Quote:
You do not need a license to watch pre recorded TV, DVD's, programs on the internet etc. You do not need a license if you own a TV capable of receiving broadcast TV. You only need a license if you "use" a TV to watch broadcast TV programs at the same time that it is broadcast. (now I'd use the word "broadcasted" there :D) Quote:
Now I'm going to run & hide. :hidewall: :D |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com