Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   police raid (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/police-raid-45185.html)

lancscat 26-01-2009 17:07

police raid
 
passing the magic wok i think its called on blackburn rd this afternoon and police were breaking the door in,about 20 went inside,anyone know what was going on?

accyman 26-01-2009 17:52

Re: police raid
 
yeah teh police were doing a raid but unfortunatly got the WONG number

lindsay ormerod 26-01-2009 18:54

Re: police raid
 
Dunno but used the place regularly for takeaway, haven't been able to get an answer since before Xmas, odd.....:confused:

K.S.H 28-01-2009 07:13

Re: police raid
 
looks like they were growing their own veg. cannabis
Posted via Mobile Device

BERNADETTE 28-01-2009 07:23

Re: police raid
 
Where abouts on Blackburn Road was it?

Mick 28-01-2009 07:37

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BERNADETTE (Post 673147)
Where abouts on Blackburn Road was it?

Its across from the garage near the chicken shop that also had its window put through just round the corner from me:)

MargaretR 28-01-2009 07:58

Re: police raid
 
20 policemen to recover cannabis plants:confused:
......they're not aggressive like triffids

BERNADETTE 28-01-2009 07:58

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mick (Post 673149)
Its across from the garage near the chicken shop that also had its window put through just round the corner from me:)

Ta Mick will have a nosey when I'm passing:mosher:

jaysay 28-01-2009 08:41

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673152)
20 policemen to recover cannabis plants:confused:
......they're not aggressive like triffids

No Margaret just the ones who smoke it:D

MargaretR 28-01-2009 08:44

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673164)
No Margaret just the ones who smoke it:D

On the contrary - as one who admits "I inhaled" - I say the effect is the complete opposite to aggression

jaysay 28-01-2009 08:54

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673165)
On the contrary - as one who admits "I inhaled" - I say the effect is the complete opposite to aggression

Well I'll take your word for it Margaret, as I've never felt the need to use any illegal substances, even though I was fetched up in the swinging 60s the era of brotherly love and peace to all men, in a laid back way of course:D:rolleyes:

***Mr D*** 28-01-2009 09:09

Re: police raid
 
Another waste of police resorses and time.

Cannabis should be reviewed, re classed, for what it is a NATURAL herb.
I dont say legalize, just decriminalise.

I have watched most street wars, policy documentry type programs, and whats the problem I see, repeat after repeat ALCHOL.

The stats speak for themselves.

Neil 28-01-2009 09:24

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673176)
Another waste of police resorses and time.

Cannabis should be reviewed, re classed, for what it is a NATURAL herb.
I dont say legalize, just decriminalise.

I have watched most street wars, policy documentry type programs, and whats the problem I see, repeat after repeat ALCHOL.

The stats speak for themselves.

But alcohol is also a natural product produced by yeast and sugar, many drugs are natural, unless you don't think poppies are natural.

MargaretR 28-01-2009 09:34

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 673183)
But alcohol is also a natural product produced by yeast and sugar, many drugs are natural, unless you don't think poppies are natural.

Alcohol is the end result of a maufacturing process using yeast.
Heroin and opium are also the result of processing poppy seed heads.
Cannabis in its leaf form is not processed (other than naturally dried)

derekgas 28-01-2009 09:57

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 672703)
Dunno but used the place regularly for takeaway, haven't been able to get an answer since before Xmas, odd.....:confused:

Had the same problem Lindsay, was good food there too!

MargaretR 28-01-2009 10:00

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by derekgas (Post 673195)
Had the same problem Lindsay, was good food there too!

...due to the 'secret ingredient' no doubt:D
I often wonder why Kentucky Fried Chicken keep their recipe secret;)

jaysay 28-01-2009 10:11

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673187)
Alcohol is the end result of a maufacturing process using yeast.
Heroin and opium are also the result of processing poppy seed heads.
Cannabis in its leaf form is not processed (other than naturally dried)

Well not as you'd notice Margaret, only when you see rooms and even warehouses set up as specialist growing rooms with heat lamps to assist with the growing process:D not to mention irrigation systems too:rolleyes:

MargaretR 28-01-2009 10:16

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673200)
Well not as you'd notice Margaret, only when you see rooms and even warehouses set up as specialist growing rooms with heat lamps to assist with the growing process:D not to mention irrigation systems too:rolleyes:

They are only grown in artificial conditions because growing is illegal without a licence.
A variety of hemp plants are cultivated under licence in this country, in open fields without need of extra heat and sunlight

PS the source of legal seeds for home growing was bird seed
.............watch out for aggressive budgies;)

jaysay 28-01-2009 10:31

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673203)
They are only grown in artificial conditions because growing is illegal without a licence.
A variety of hemp plants are cultivated under licence in this country, in open fields without need of extra heat and sunlight

PS the source of legal seeds for home growing was bird seed
.............watch out for aggressive budgies;)

So thats why I had to have micky put down, the blighter nearly pecked my eyes out:D

Neil 28-01-2009 11:00

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673203)
PS the source of legal seeds for home growing was bird seed
.............watch out for aggressive budgies;)

The seeds are not illegal as they do not contain THC.

jaysay 28-01-2009 11:03

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 673216)
The seeds are not illegal as they do not contain THC.

Excuse me for being thick Neil, but whats THC:confused:

emamum 28-01-2009 11:08

Re: police raid
 
Production of THC in cannabis

Quote:

THC (tetra-hydro-cannibol) is one of over 400 cannibols present in the cannabis plant and is responsible for the 'high' associated with smoking cannabis.

It is present in all cannabis plants, male and female but in varying quantities. Canabis with a low THC content will have a weak effect. The other cannibols present will be responsible for a heavy, sleepy stoned effect.

I saw the story in the papaer today but i didnt read it all.... the policemen said they could smell the canabis.... how many people would recognise the smell of it? there are other plants that smell a little canabis like as well..

***Mr D*** 28-01-2009 11:13

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 673183)
But alcohol is also a natural product produced by yeast and sugar, many drugs are natural, unless you don't think poppies are natural.

You could leave a cannabis plant in the open and smoke it once complete and dried with no further processing, like a apple.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673200)
Well not as you'd notice Margaret, only when you see rooms and even warehouses set up as specialist growing rooms with heat lamps to assist with the growing process:D not to mention irrigation systems too:rolleyes:

Thats because its driven underground. They are not Heat lamps the are high powered sodium lights.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673218)
Excuse me for being thick Neil, but whats THC:confused:

Tetrahydrocannabinol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am a strong believer that laws should be changed.

emamum 28-01-2009 11:14

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673223)
You could leave a cannabis plant in the open and smoke it once complete and dried with no further processing, like a apple.
.

ive never smoked an apple :D

MargaretR 28-01-2009 11:19

Re: police raid
 
I am a strong believer that laws should be changed.

Pharmacutical companies (the evil in our midst) will not let it happen because they are busy synthasising and patenting the chemicals in it, for sale at inflated prices to our cash strapped NHS, for pain relief for arthritis

***Mr D*** 28-01-2009 11:25

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by emamum (Post 673224)
ive never smoked an apple :D

Give it a Try.

Or dried Banana Skins. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673225)
I am a strong believer that laws should be changed.

Pharmacutical companies (the evil in our midst) will not let it happen because they are busy synthasising and patenting the chemicals in it, for sale at inflated prices to our cash strapped NHS, for pain relief for arthritis

Exactly and it would be hard to tax.

Im looking for changed laws, relating to possession & personal use cultivation.

The many people who say its bad dont really know anything about it.

jaysay 28-01-2009 16:15

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673223)
You could leave a cannabis plant in the open and smoke it once complete and dried with no further processing, like a apple.



Thats because its driven underground. They are not Heat lamps the are high powered sodium lights.



Tetrahydrocannabinol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am a strong believer that laws should be changed.

I feel sorry for anybody who feels the need to take any substance just for kicks, its bad enough having to take prescribed drugs let alone illegals for fun:(

MargaretR 28-01-2009 16:25

Re: police raid
 
Many people need cannabis for pain relief and are being denied it.
Pain management is a notorously neglected part of our NHS.
When distalgestics were withdrawn from the prescription list, many people were offered nothing stronger than paracetemol.

It should be allowed for medicinal use - if it also makes a sick person happy at the same time why begrudge them that

***Mr D*** 28-01-2009 16:27

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673299)
I feel sorry for anybody who feels the need to take any substance just for kicks, its bad enough having to take prescribed drugs let alone illegals for fun:(

Perscribed drugs I bet will be worse for you, the medical possabilities for cannabis are just being seen.

jaysay 28-01-2009 16:40

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673307)
Perscribed drugs I bet will be worse for you, the medical possabilities for cannabis are just being seen.

You obviously haven't had any serious health problems to make a statement like that

MargaretR 28-01-2009 16:42

Re: police raid
 
I have health problems caused by prescription drugs

emamum 28-01-2009 16:44

Re: police raid
 
i try to take as little medication as possible, i prefer to use something more natural wherever possible, same with ty.. my uncle died because his body had built up a tolerance to his medication.

***Mr D*** 28-01-2009 17:28

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673316)
You obviously haven't had any serious health problems to make a statement like that

Maybe not, but whats that got to do with it.

BBC NEWS | Health | Doctors 'recommend cannabis use'

Not bad 45% say cannabis worked better than perscribed medicine.

Do a bit of googling on the uses of cannabis, you will see its not all that bad as some people make you believe.

Even Obamah Has a Opinion.:D
YouTube - Barack Obama on Marijuana Decriminalization (2004)

panther 28-01-2009 17:57

Re: police raid
 
I believe in cannabis for medicine purposes, because its controlled, but people taking it just to 'chill out' is stupid!, it can make ya paranoid and some people i know who have took it look terrible in my opinion.

jaysay 29-01-2009 10:47

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673328)
Maybe not, but whats that got to do with it.

BBC NEWS | Health | Doctors 'recommend cannabis use'

Not bad 45% say cannabis worked better than perscribed medicine.

Do a bit of googling on the uses of cannabis, you will see its not all that bad as some people make you believe.

Even Obamah Has a Opinion.:D
YouTube - Barack Obama on Marijuana Decriminalization (2004)

Well the thing is Mr. D. I take prescription pain killers, probably the strongest you can get outside hospital, but cannabis wouldn't be any good for me as being chronic asthmatic smoking anything is a no no.

emamum 29-01-2009 10:50

Re: police raid
 
you can eat it jaysay :D

***Mr D*** 29-01-2009 11:34

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by emamum (Post 673511)
you can eat it jaysay :D

What she said. :D or drink it.

I believe threw the doctor it is in a spray form.

jaysay 29-01-2009 16:20

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by emamum (Post 673511)
you can eat it jaysay :D

I'm sure like your good self ema, I'm careful what I put in my mouth:rolleyes:

accyman 29-01-2009 18:02

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673328)

what a shocker

an american black guy whos ok with drugs pmsl :D

Morecambe Ex Pat 30-01-2009 08:54

Re: police raid
 
There are convincing arguments from both sides of the legalising cannabis fence.
Medical use has been promoted for a number of years for conditions such as MS.
I have very limited experience of its medical use so would prefer to comment on the aspect I do have experience of which is social use.

The experts against legalising/non criminalising it tell us that it is addictive, causes paranoia, leads to the use of more powerful substances and turns people into social degenerates.
Smoked in small quantities, cannabis can be enjoyed as a recreational drug and the user suffers no after effects at all. It isn't addictive and does not automatically make the user want to try something stronger. It invokes a state of mild contentment and a feeling of extreme well being. In that respect, it is just the same as alcohol which when taken responsibly, creates a very pleasant atmosphere and causes the user no after effects at all, except in the case of alcohol a hangover the following day.

On the other hand, over use of cannabis does cause mental anxiety and can trigger some very serious mental problems. Smoked in large quantities, it is a very dangerous substance indeed.

Most cannabis smokers and alcohol drinkers take their chosen substance in controlled quantities and having enjoyed the effects, return back to their normal mental state and carry on with their lives.

Heavy smokers and heavy drinkers on the other hand, just don't know when to stop. Binge drinkers will quite happily drink themselves into oblivion and try the fight with the rest of the world on the way to the kebab shop after a session.
Heavy smokers will exceed the feeling of contentment and enter a state of near unconciousness. In the same way that excessive alcohol can damage vital organs of the body, cannabis too can damage the body, particularly the brain. Small amounts of cannabis have little, long term, effect on the brain but increased use can severely affect shorth term memory and induce paranoia.
The Government seem to have a strange attitude towards what we as the general public are and are not allowed to do. They make laws preventing us from using harmful substances such as cannabis yet allow the purchase of other, far more dangerous things such as Alcohol and Fireworks to be perfectly acceptable.
I respect the wishes of people who do not wish to smoke cannabis in the same way that people can choose not to drink alcohol or eat meat etc. but I do object to not being allowed to make a choice.

Just for the record, I would not even consider taking any of the white powders and mysterious tablets which are available these days, common sense tells me that they could contain anything. I have also seen first hand how such substances can turn coherent human beings into non functioning zombies in an alarmingly short time.

jaysay 30-01-2009 10:50

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morecambe Ex Pat (Post 673773)
There are convincing arguments from both sides of the legalising cannabis fence.
Medical use has been promoted for a number of years for conditions such as MS.
I have very limited experience of its medical use so would prefer to comment on the aspect I do have experience of which is social use.

The experts against legalising/non criminalising it tell us that it is addictive, causes paranoia, leads to the use of more powerful substances and turns people into social degenerates.
Smoked in small quantities, cannabis can be enjoyed as a recreational drug and the user suffers no after effects at all. It isn't addictive and does not automatically make the user want to try something stronger. It invokes a state of mild contentment and a feeling of extreme well being. In that respect, it is just the same as alcohol which when taken responsibly, creates a very pleasant atmosphere and causes the user no after effects at all, except in the case of alcohol a hangover the following day.

On the other hand, over use of cannabis does cause mental anxiety and can trigger some very serious mental problems. Smoked in large quantities, it is a very dangerous substance indeed.

Most cannabis smokers and alcohol drinkers take their chosen substance in controlled quantities and having enjoyed the effects, return back to their normal mental state and carry on with their lives.

Heavy smokers and heavy drinkers on the other hand, just don't know when to stop. Binge drinkers will quite happily drink themselves into oblivion and try the fight with the rest of the world on the way to the kebab shop after a session.
Heavy smokers will exceed the feeling of contentment and enter a state of near unconciousness. In the same way that excessive alcohol can damage vital organs of the body, cannabis too can damage the body, particularly the brain. Small amounts of cannabis have little, long term, effect on the brain but increased use can severely affect short term memory and induce paranoia.
The Government seem to have a strange attitude towards what we as the general public are and are not allowed to do. They make laws preventing us from using harmful substances such as cannabis yet allow the purchase of other, far more dangerous things such as Alcohol and Fireworks to be perfectly acceptable.
I respect the wishes of people who do not wish to smoke cannabis in the same way that people can choose not to drink alcohol or eat meat etc. but I do object to not being allowed to make a choice.

Just for the record, I would not even consider taking any of the white powders and mysterious tablets which are available these days, common sense tells me that they could contain anything. I have also seen first hand how such substances can turn coherent human beings into non functioning zombies in an alarmingly short time.

I actually think that you put a valid argument across here, but I think the Governments thinking in this case is not the actually smoking of cannabis, but the fact that doing so leads to addiction of other narcotics such as Crack Cocaine and Heroine. Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 11:19

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673794)
I actually think that you put a valid argument across here, but I think the Governments thinking in this case is not the actually smoking of cannabis, but the fact that doing so leads to addiction of other narcotics such as Crack Cocaine and Heroine. Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis

You really dont have a clue.

It people like you that give an opinion but do not have the foggiest idea what it REALLY like.

Cannabis leads to addiction to Crack Cocaine & Heroine, dont be so pathetic.

"Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis", says Who THE SUN newspaper.

If anything, Class A Drugs, Cocaine, Anphatamine (SP) Ect are mainly used by DRINKERS to help them when they GO OUT, to KEEP UP as they cant as tehy have DRUNK to MUCH ALCHOL.

As for Smack and Crack Cocaine, you find that more likely you use/try it because you assossiate with that group of people, not becaue you had a smoke of cannabis.

Do some checking up on FACTS.

MargaretR 30-01-2009 11:26

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673794)
Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis

Also the vast majority of people who have smoked cannabis never go on to be addicted to hard drugs.

Addictive personalities exist - whether they start by using cannabis or prescription drugs like codeine and valium - addiction is not capable of being controlled by legislation

The reason why cannabis is treated differently from codeine and valium is because the pharmacutical companies are unable to profit from it
(but they are trying:rolleyes:)

emamum 30-01-2009 11:51

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673800)
You really dont have a clue.

It people like you that give an opinion but do not have the foggiest idea what it REALLY like.

Cannabis leads to addiction to Crack Cocaine & Heroine, dont be so pathetic.

"Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis", says Who THE SUN newspaper.

If anything, Class A Drugs, Cocaine, Anphatamine (SP) Ect are mainly used by DRINKERS to help them when they GO OUT, to KEEP UP as they cant as tehy have DRUNK to MUCH ALCHOL.

As for Smack and Crack Cocaine, you find that more likely you use/try it because you assossiate with that group of people, not becaue you had a smoke of cannabis.

Do some checking up on FACTS.

i think you have been a bit hard on jaysay there... we are led to believe that canabis leads to hard drugs, i agree with you, i know a lot of people that have used cannabis but not gone onto anything else and i saw more hard drugs when i was working as a bar maid in pubs and nightclubs.

MargaretR 30-01-2009 11:53

Re: police raid
 
This youtube clip will show you that cannabis does not cause aggression
YouTube - marijuana firefighter
what a happy fireman:D

jaysay 30-01-2009 11:53

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673800)
You really dont have a clue.

It people like you that give an opinion but do not have the foggiest idea what it REALLY like.

Cannabis leads to addiction to Crack Cocaine & Heroine, dont be so pathetic.

"Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis", says Who THE SUN newspaper.

If anything, Class A Drugs, Cocaine, Anphatamine (SP) Ect are mainly used by DRINKERS to help them when they GO OUT, to KEEP UP as they cant as tehy have DRUNK to MUCH ALCHOL.

As for Smack and Crack Cocaine, you find that more likely you use/try it because you assossiate with that group of people, not becaue you had a smoke of cannabis.

Do some checking up on FACTS.

I'm talking from a point of view that I have never found the need to take illegal substances of any kind, if there was no danger in smoking cannabis then it wouldn't be classed as being harmful. I have used alcohol since I was 16 and am now 62 and have never been dependant on that either, I also smoked tobacco too, but gave that up 31 years ago on the 26th Jan 1978. So we will have to differ on substance abuse, if you want to smoke the stuff carry on its you body and your health that's at stake, not mine:)

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 12:10

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673806)
I'm talking from a point of view that I have never found the need to take illegal substances of any kind, if there was no danger in smoking cannabis then it wouldn't be classed as being harmful. I have used alcohol since I was 16 and am now 62 and have never been dependant on that either, I also smoked tobacco too, but gave that up 31 years ago on the 26th Jan 1978. So we will have to differ on substance abuse, if you want to smoke the stuff carry on its you body and your health that's at stake, not mine:)

But you stated.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673806)
Its widely understood that the vast majority of drug addicts who use hard drugs start on the downward spiral by smoking cannabis

Thats stating, People who smoke cannabis are already on the downward spiral and WILL use hard drugs. Not True.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673806)
but the fact that doing so leads to addiction of other narcotics such as Crack Cocaine and Heroine

How does this work then.

emamum 30-01-2009 12:15

Re: police raid
 
jaysay.... i think what mr d is trying to say is that saying that if you smoke cannabis you will start taking hard drugs is like saying that all smokers will start smoking cannabis
does that make sense?

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 12:16

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by emamum (Post 673814)
jaysay.... i think what mr d is trying to say is that saying that if you smoke cannabis you will start taking hard drugs is like saying that all smokers will start smoking cannabis
does that make sense?

Or drinkers will drink meths/absynth. :D

emamum 30-01-2009 12:20

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673815)
Or drinkers will drink meths/absynth. :D

i really wouldnt recommend drinking absinth :hesoff:

garinda 30-01-2009 12:24

Re: police raid
 
Blimey, the argument from some of the pro-canabis brigade seems quite aggressive.

:D

cashman 30-01-2009 12:36

Re: police raid
 
with mrd on this, as one who smoked cannabis from mid 60s to 73 ish pretty regular, i never found the need to graduate to "Hard Drugs" heavy abuse of any substance leads to complications, any fool, except a government fool is aware of that i imagine.i reckon anyone who has used it, (not to extremes) would say there is more pluses than minuses to it.:)

jaysay 30-01-2009 12:46

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 673825)
with mrd on this, as one who smoked cannabis from mid 60s to 73 ish pretty regular, i never found the need to graduate to "Hard Drugs" heavy abuse of any substance leads to complications, any fool, except a government fool is aware of that i imagine.i reckon anyone who has used it, (not to extremes) would say there is more pluses than minuses to it.:)

Ya cashy but you had will power:D

jaysay 30-01-2009 12:47

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673815)
Or drinkers will drink meths/absynth. :D

Whats it like with coke (the drink that is):D

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 12:49

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673831)
Whats it like with coke (the drink that is):D

A bit to fizzy. and it alters the taste.:D

cashman 30-01-2009 12:51

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 673829)
Ya cashy but you had will power:D

I Beg Your Pardon? never had a bloke in me life.:D

MargaretR 30-01-2009 12:55

Re: police raid
 
Far more people are addicted to painkillers than cannabis, and their bodies are more damaged by those painkillers
The silent addiction to everyday painkillers | Mail Online

That very strong painkiller that you say you take, Jaysay, will be an 'opium derivative' - which translates to 'having the chemical constituents of opium' but more costly because it is manufactured and sold to the Nhs at an exhorbitant cost by pharmacutical companies.
If you had to pay for those painkillers you may well find that it would work out cheaper to grow poppies :D

garinda 30-01-2009 13:10

Re: police raid
 
Of course not every user of canabis is going to go on to harder drugs, just as all those who drink alcohol don't all become alcoholics.

What I do know is that every smack head I've known started off on the wacky-backy. Fact.

Personally I think it should be legalised, because like prostitution, legal or illegal, it isn't going to go away, and with a legal status it's safety could be controlled to some extent...plus the government could raise lots of taxes from all those dope users.:D

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 13:18

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 673839)
Of course not every user of canabis is going to go on to harder drugs, just as all those who drink alcohol don't all become alcoholics.

What I do know is that every smack head I've known started off on the wacky-backy. Fact.

Personally I think it should be legalised, because like prostitution, legal or illegal, it isn't going to go away, and with a legal status it's safety could be controlled to some extent...plus the government could raise lots of taxes from all those dope users.:D

Supprising as it sounds I dont want cannabis to be legalised.

I would go for decramanilisation (SP).
In my view rules like this would be better.

You can possess a certain amount on your person in Public.
You can possess a larger amount kept on your premises.
You can cultivate a certain number of plants for Personall use only.
You cannot smoke it in a public area

All the smack heads I know also started of on the drink - Fact.

Morecambe Ex Pat 30-01-2009 13:27

Re: police raid
 
Just to play devil's advocate
All the smack heads I know started on baby milk

There has always been the lame argument that once a person tries cannabis that they will automatically move on to stronger drugs. Many users of the stronger drugs, who I have known personally, did start on cannabis and then moved on to the stronger stuff but they would have gone in that direction anyway. It wasn't the cannabis that turned them into cocaine addicts but their personalities which drove them to find something that was missing from their lives. I am not saying that cannabis is 100% safe because any 'poison' you inflict on your body has to have some effect but there is more danger from the tobacco in a joint than there is from the cannabis. The obvious answer is to leave both well alone but if that doesn't get you, the artificial additives and preservatives in the food we eat probably will. They won't ban them because they are for our own good.
I think there is a greater danger to modern drinkers who quaff these alcopop type drinks and energetically dance in a crowded night club. Dehydration with a high concentration of alcohol in your system is a great problem and can lead to some serious organ damage.

Morecambe Ex Pat 30-01-2009 13:32

Re: police raid
 
I would not like to see it made legal either but I think certain amount of tolerance should be shown. Wasting Police time dealing with someone with a small quantity is a waste of resources.

jaysay 30-01-2009 16:04

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 673835)
Far more people are addicted to painkillers than cannabis, and their bodies are more damaged by those painkillers
The silent addiction to everyday painkillers | Mail Online

That very strong painkiller that you say you take, Jaysay, will be an 'opium derivative' - which translates to 'having the chemical constituents of opium' but more costly because it is manufactured and sold to the Nhs at an exhorbitant cost by pharmacutical companies.
If you had to pay for those painkillers you may well find that it would work out cheaper to grow poppies :D

Those tablets are like you say, DF118s Margaret, as for growing poppies, I ain't got a garden and I think it would be give away if I had to use the little strip of ground outside my palatial abode on Mallard :D

garinda 30-01-2009 18:26

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 673842)
Supprising as it sounds I dont want cannabis to be legalised.

I would go for decramanilisation (SP).
In my view rules like this would be better.

You can possess a certain amount on your person in Public.
You can possess a larger amount kept on your premises.
You can cultivate a certain number of plants for Personall use only.
You cannot smoke it in a public area

All the smack heads I know also started of on the drink - Fact.

Why would you not legalise it though, seeing as you proclaim it's benefits?

I know people who take it for medical as well as social reasons, and they are good upstanding citizens.

I also see as generation of work shy layabouts every morning on the Jerermy Kyle programme, who also smoke it, and it doesn't seem to benefit them much.

***Mr D*** 30-01-2009 23:48

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 673934)
Why would you not legalise it though, seeing as you proclaim it's benefits?

I would not legalise it as could be abused, and then become a problem, more just let those who use it for whatever reason do so for personal use without fear of prossicution. (SP)

Anyone who can benefit medically from using cannabis should be allowed, without being a law breaker.

garinda 30-01-2009 23:54

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 674074)
I would not legalise it as could be abused, and then become a problem, more just let those who use it for whatever reason do so for personal use without fear of prossicution. (SP)

Anyone who can benefit medically from using cannabis should be allowed, without being a law breaker.

It could still be abused if it was decriminalised, which it more or less is at present, in that prosecutions for personal possesion are few and far between.

Could you give more details how legalising it would lead to more further abuse than there is at present?

Mancie 31-01-2009 00:17

Re: police raid
 
The law on cannabis was changed the other day from class C to class B... but still states that 1st offence for possesion is a caution..upgraded to a court procedings for supply and gaining income from selling... even at that stage the court guidelines are to fine the offender.
If you condsider smoking cannabis as drug abuse then to legalise it would definatley increase the use of cannabis but increase Goverment income through high taxes on the substance...but then just as tobbaco there will be people eager to undercut by selling it cheaper without tax.. so back to square one!

garinda 31-01-2009 08:33

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 674081)
The law on cannabis was changed the other day from class C to class B... but still states that 1st offence for possesion is a caution..upgraded to a court procedings for supply and gaining income from selling... even at that stage the court guidelines are to fine the offender.
If you condsider smoking cannabis as drug abuse then to legalise it would definatley increase the use of cannabis but increase Goverment income through high taxes on the substance...but then just as tobbaco there will be people eager to undercut by selling it cheaper without tax.. so back to square one!

Even though cannabis has recently been reclassified from Class C to Class B, it still sounds highly unlikely that someone would face court proceedings unless they were supplying it.

Cannabis | Home Office

I'm still puzzled as to why some people think it would be 'abused' more if it was legalised, than it is now.

SPUGGIE J 31-01-2009 08:37

Re: police raid
 
If all those that like a bit of weed skunk black soapbar etc were taken to court and even jailed we could fill the prisons twice over. It is a habit that like smoking has a fair wack of bods in its grip and with more serious damage in the long term.

cashman 31-01-2009 08:51

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J (Post 674108)
If all those that like a bit of weed skunk black soapbar etc were taken to court and even jailed we could fill the prisons twice over. It is a habit that like smoking has a fair wack of bods in its grip and with more serious damage in the long term.

same with drinking spug, anyone does it to excess is likely to get serious damage.:)

SPUGGIE J 31-01-2009 09:06

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 674110)
same with drinking spug, anyone does it to excess is likely to get serious damage.:)

Well I wont be one of the damaged drinkers. Aint had any since the meet before crimbo. :( And will be at least 2 weeks before I get another taster.

***Mr D*** 31-01-2009 09:31

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 674107)
Even though cannabis has recently been reclassified from Class C to Class B, it still sounds highly unlikely that someone would face court proceedings unless they were supplying it.

Cannabis | Home Office

I'm still puzzled as to why some people think it would be 'abused' more if it was legalised, than it is now.

Because if it was legalised it could result in more people who wouldnt of normal used it to give it a try, Im not after encouraging people to use cannabis, just those that do for personal reason be free from prosicution. (SP)

garinda 31-01-2009 09:47

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D*** (Post 674140)
Because if it was legalised it could result in more people who wouldnt of normal used it to give it a try, Im not after encouraging people to use cannabis, just those that do for personal reason be free from prosicution. (SP)


But they'd also be free from prosecution if it was legalised, and since it's current usage seems quite well spread, and it's as harmless as you claim, what's the problem if more people tried it?

You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too, free from any responsibility, and taxation, that legalisation would bring.

***Mr D*** 31-01-2009 11:29

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 674153)
But they'd also be free from prosecution if it was legalised, and since it's current usage seems quite well spread, and it's as harmless as you claim, what's the problem if more people tried it?

You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too, free from any responsibility, and taxation, that legalisation would bring.

Where have I clamed its harmless?

How would legalisation bring responsability?

Im not against legalisation, I just dont think it would be the best way forward.

Speedy 31-01-2009 22:29

Re: police raid
 
Im against legalistion, its expensive enough as it is without paying tax on it:eek:.

Tax man takes enough out my wage as it is:mad:.

Benipete 31-01-2009 22:36

Re: police raid
 
quote;
You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too, free from any responsibility, and taxation, that legalisation would bring.


only if It's Space Cake.:D:D

garinda 31-01-2009 22:58

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benipete (Post 674458)

only if It's Space Cake.:D:D

I'm happy at least someone spotted that.:mosher:

garinda 03-02-2009 19:30

Re: police raid
 
Tonight's Horizon, BBC 2 at 9 pm, looks scientifically at the pros and cons of cannabis.

BBC - BBC Two Programmes - Horizon, Cannabis: The Evil Weed?

panther 03-02-2009 19:42

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 675633)
Tonight's Horizon, BBC 2 at 9 pm, looks scientifically at the pros and cons of cannabis.

BBC - BBC Two Programmes - Horizon, Cannabis: The Evil Weed?

Sounds interesting, but its on when CSI is on, so i wont be watching, but i migt flick over when adverts are on!:D

garinda 03-02-2009 19:55

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by panther (Post 675650)
Sounds interesting, but its on when CSI is on, so i wont be watching, but i migt flick over when adverts are on!:D

You don't have to flick yourself off.:rolleyes:

You can watch it later on the BBC iPlayer.:D

BBC iPlayer - Home

:mosher:

citizenx 03-02-2009 20:21

Re: police raid
 
Funny :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 672680)
yeah teh police were doing a raid but unfortunatly got the WONG number


garinda 03-02-2009 23:50

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 675633)
Tonight's Horizon, BBC 2 at 9 pm, looks scientifically at the pros and cons of cannabis.

BBC - BBC Two Programmes - Horizon, Cannabis: The Evil Weed?

An interesting programme, though it did feature more heavily on the downsides, rather than the positive.

In California, where cannabis can be legally prescribed, a doctor was asked if he'd prescribe the drug for 'writer's block', as well as the more regular ailments of 'pain' and 'fatigue', and the answer was yes.

I'm certain I don't want to come back to this world as a lab rat/mouse.

Given regular dope at the human equivalent age of thirteen, then having to put your nose through a hole a certain number of times to get your smack.

Even worse were the doped up mice who had to swim through milk to find the hidden platform.

It was like Rodent Big Brother.

steeljack 04-02-2009 01:10

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 675717)

In California, where cannabis can be legally prescribed, a doctor was asked if he'd prescribe the drug for 'writer's block', as well as the more regular ailments of 'pain' and 'fatigue', and the answer was yes.

.

not sure what was shown on the TV program but this is a bit of an update
Attorney general proposes sensible rules on medical pot

a few years back California voters approved "medicinial marijuana" for folks who needed 'homeopath' (sp?) relief from wasting/painfull medical conditions ...ok, I think , its not a bad idea I'll vote for it , knowing full well that that this was 180° opposite to U S Federal law , but what the hell , it was on the ballot so I voted for it for humanitarian reasons .
What you need to know about the US and States rights in particular is that any group can get a law/by-law passed in their local area/county/state is by collecting enough signatures (not sure but I think its 10% of registered voters in the area to get the item on a ballot )
the proponants ran a good election , great TV ads etc. so the ballot passed .......only problem , the US has private medical system and there was no way for drug stores/chemists to be part of the distribution system (they would be violating Federal/National law) so it was decided that private Cannabis dispensaries/co-opratives be allowed to operate with the proviso that any "patient" provided a doctors prescription was presented , Doctors in the US work for money , not the betterment of humanity instantly jumped on this as a money making scheme and began writing out re-fillable scrips out for anything at $50 a time . Cannabis clinics stated popping up everywhere without any control selling the stuff for cash only ......what happened ...every low-life gang-banger decided the areas and car parks around these places were ripe for picking , not only were the patients being mugged but the "clinics" were ripe for armed robbery for the cash on site , requiring the need for on-site armed guards........enough was enough , the Local Govt. association finally got permission from Sacramento (State Capital ,Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger) to regulate these places and most of them have been closed down .

garinda 04-02-2009 23:32

Re: police raid
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 675721)
not sure what was shown on the TV program but this is a bit of an update
Attorney general proposes sensible rules on medical pot

a few years back California voters approved "medicinial marijuana" for folks who needed 'homeopath' (sp?) relief from wasting/painfull medical conditions ...ok, I think , its not a bad idea I'll vote for it , knowing full well that that this was 180° opposite to U S Federal law , but what the hell , it was on the ballot so I voted for it for humanitarian reasons .
What you need to know about the US and States rights in particular is that any group can get a law/by-law passed in their local area/county/state is by collecting enough signatures (not sure but I think its 10% of registered voters in the area to get the item on a ballot )
the proponants ran a good election , great TV ads etc. so the ballot passed .......only problem , the US has private medical system and there was no way for drug stores/chemists to be part of the distribution system (they would be violating Federal/National law) so it was decided that private Cannabis dispensaries/co-opratives be allowed to operate with the proviso that any "patient" provided a doctors prescription was presented , Doctors in the US work for money , not the betterment of humanity instantly jumped on this as a money making scheme and began writing out re-fillable scrips out for anything at $50 a time . Cannabis clinics stated popping up everywhere without any control selling the stuff for cash only ......what happened ...every low-life gang-banger decided the areas and car parks around these places were ripe for picking , not only were the patients being mugged but the "clinics" were ripe for armed robbery for the cash on site , requiring the need for on-site armed guards........enough was enough , the Local Govt. association finally got permission from Sacramento (State Capital ,Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger) to regulate these places and most of them have been closed down .

They didn't say where the shop featured in the programme was, though it looked like Palm Springs.

Dope olive oil, dope muffins, dope ice cream, dope on a roap.

:rolleyes:

steeljack 06-02-2009 06:51

Re: police raid
 
Thanks to Rupert Murdoch and his slimeball employees at the News of the World US swimmer Michael Phelps has been suspended by the governing body of the sport in the US for 3 months, ..........now someone please tell me in language an idiot could understand how using Cannabis could enhance his performance in the pool ?
Where is the common sense ? if he had been using steroids or boosters OK , I can live with that, it would give him an unfair advantage in competition , using cannabis/marijuana in a swim meet would probably mean he would think he was in the womens sycronised swim competition or the water polo competion .
Evidently Kellogs one of his major sponsors has also cancelled his contract .......a word to Kellogs .....the only time most folks eat your sugar laden crap is when they get the munchies
BBC NEWS | Americas | Phelps suspended over 'pot pipe'


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com