![]() |
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Quote:
Quote:
So Barclays employs better financial wizz's than the treasury. that sounds like good business sense to me(and not unheard of based on the fact that treasury wages are unlikely to be close to whats available in teh private sector in this sort of field). So what you upset about. The fact that someone used the rules to their advantage? or was it simply a dig at Barclays for being successful again? What is it about slagging off success? I've said it before, do you want to live in a country full of Losers? Would it make you feel better if all banks were financially ruined? |
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Quote:
|
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Quote:
I don't know if you read many newspapers, but the story has been in all of them recently, including the Times, and that great, factually accurate publication the Daily Telegraph. The banker, his socialite wife and the billion pound tax question - Times Online Can Barclays avoid being nationalised? - Telegraph Perhaps you should read a more varied selection of available media, thus ensuring a more accurate picture, so you don't jump to the wrong conclusions.;) |
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Quote:
|
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Wish I was paying the highest rate of tax, I'd be a very happy bunny:D
|
Re: 45p Tax on high earners
Bearing in mind that Richard 'Bloody' Branson employs lots of people in this country, Virgin Atlantic, Trains, Megastores, Holidays, Credit card, Bank. Maybe it would be rather silly to let him ****** off somewhere else, as he would take his companies with him, and of course make thousands of people unemployed.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com