Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Legal History (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/legal-history-47950.html)

jaysay 18-06-2009 11:19

Legal History
 
Legal history has been made with the court of appeal ruling that for the first time in Englandand and Wales a trial can be held without a jury. Its the case of 4 men accused of an Armed Robbery at Heathrow Airport. The judge said there was a significant danger of jury tampering, one judge will site alone to hear the case

Tealeaf 18-06-2009 11:23

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 722724)
.... The judge said there was a significant danger of jury tampering, one judge will site alone to hear the case

Do you mean sit or ****e?

derekgas 18-06-2009 11:24

Re: Legal History
 
Not sure I would agree with this, it is much easier to 'tamper' with one person, than with a whole jury numbering twelve people!

Tealeaf 18-06-2009 11:27

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by derekgas (Post 722726)
Not sure I would agree with this, it is much easier to 'tamper' with one person, than with a whole jury numbering twelve people!

That's why the majority verdict of 10-2 was introduced some years ago, replacing the requirement for all twelve jurors to agree on guilt.

Eric 18-06-2009 15:34

Re: Legal History
 
Isn't it up to the accused to elect whether he is tried by a jury or by a judge alone?

jaysay 18-06-2009 15:50

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 722725)
Do you mean sit or ****e?

Without the "e" Tealeaf:rolleyes:

jaysay 18-06-2009 15:53

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 722796)
Isn't it up to the accused to elect whether he is tried by a jury or by a judge alone?

Not here Eric, you can chose trial by jury or by magistrate for some cases, its only a short time ago that legislation was past to allow no jury trials and its the first time its been used, think it was past in 2007

***Mr D*** 18-06-2009 15:58

Re: Legal History
 
Sounds a bit dodgy to me.

How do we know the accused would be getting a fair trial.

accyman 18-06-2009 19:03

Re: Legal History
 
i wonder how long it will be before tey start dragging people into court without a jury for mush lesser crimes

they could have still had a jury if teh jury was sat in another building watching by video link so they couldnt be seen

that way there would have at least been a jury where now it all depends on what side of teh bed a judge got out of that particular day

***Mr D*** 18-06-2009 23:32

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 722864)
i wonder how long it will be before tey start dragging people into court without a jury for mush lesser crimes

they could have still had a jury if teh jury was sat in another building watching by video link so they couldnt be seen

that way there would have at least been a jury where now it all depends on what side of teh bed a judge got out of that particular day

Probably not to long.

True they could of had a jury by video link wonder why they chose not to have one at all.:confused:

accyman 19-06-2009 00:59

Re: Legal History
 
no idea but i bet when found guilty which wont be a surprises verdict even if they were innocent teh case comes up before teh european courts as an unfair trial

unless its european law that you can be tried without a jury european law usually over rides english law

steeljack 19-06-2009 03:30

Re: Legal History
 
maybe its just what the UK needs , a few modern day Judge Jeffreys, someone who doesn't take any crap . :D :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Jeffries

SPUGGIE J 19-06-2009 04:59

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 722984)
maybe its just what the UK needs , a few modern day Judge Jeffreys, someone who doesn't take any crap . :D :D

George Jeffreys, 1st Baron Jeffreys - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


How long before we end up with a legal system like that the comic 2000AD had with Judge Dredd?

jaysay 19-06-2009 09:15

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J (Post 722986)
How long before we end up with a legal system like that the comic 2000AD had with Judge Dredd?

He didn't take crap of any one:D

Tealeaf 19-06-2009 09:19

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 723021)
He didn't take crap of any one:D

Of or off..........?

jaysay 19-06-2009 09:44

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 723023)
Of or off..........?

Are you Sams Dad or what:D

accyman 19-06-2009 13:01

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 723035)
Are you Sams Dad or what:D

lol :D

Tealeaf 19-06-2009 13:15

Re: Legal History
 
Who's Sam? Am I missing something here?

jaysay 19-06-2009 15:47

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 723078)
Who's Sam? Am I missing something here?

He's a cheeky young whipper snapper who points out mistakes:D

accyman 19-06-2009 15:51

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 723129)
He's a cheeky young whipper snapper who points out mistakes:D

yeah hes a bit of a cupid stunt :)

jaysay 20-06-2009 09:01

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 723131)
yeah hes a bit of a cupid stunt :)

Exactly:D

wadey 20-06-2009 10:27

Re: Legal History
 
They don't have jury trials in Northern Ireland

jaysay 20-06-2009 11:58

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wadey (Post 723343)
They don't have jury trials in Northern Ireland

They do now

MargaretR 20-06-2009 12:16

Re: Legal History
 
A dangerous development - what next? - legal lynch mobs?

Tealeaf 20-06-2009 12:19

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 723364)
A dangerous development - what next? - legal lynch mobs?

I can't wait........

jaysay 20-06-2009 12:24

Re: Legal History
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 723364)
A dangerous development - what next? - legal lynch mobs?

Ordinary ones would be fine by me for some of today's cretins:rolleyes:

jaysay 20-06-2009 12:29

Re: Legal History
 
Just a little wander, Alan Stanford has been remanded in custody charged with embezzling $8 million, if found guilty he'll be sentenced to over 350 years inside without parole:rolleyes:. What would he get in this country, afternoon tea on the Westminster terrace with Gordon, so he could give him lessons on book keeping


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com