Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   T.V. licence. (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/t-v-licence-48217.html)

nortype 07-07-2009 20:13

T.V. licence.
 
why do we have pay this when so many programes are repeat's

accyman 07-07-2009 20:19

Re: T.V. licence.
 
get a photocopy of last years cheque from the bank and send them that then :-)

nortype 07-07-2009 20:29

Re: T.V. licence.
 
what good would that do. ?

K.S.H 07-07-2009 20:40

Re: T.V. licence.
 
You'd be giving them "repeats" too :D

nortype 07-07-2009 20:42

Re: T.V. licence.
 
aye ok cheer's

Benipete 07-07-2009 21:23

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nortype (Post 727150)
why do we have pay this when so many programes are repeat's

Do speak up I can't hear you.:D:D

Wynonie Harris 07-07-2009 21:24

Re: T.V. licence.
 
You're not paying for repeats, you're paying for Woss and Brand's exceedingly generous salaries!

Margaret Pilkington 07-07-2009 21:28

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Because it is the law......you have to have a licence to receive broadcasts.

lancsdave 07-07-2009 21:30

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 727180)
Because it is the law......you have to have a licence to receive broadcasts.

It just happens to be one of the most compulsory taxes governed by law :rolleyes:

cashman 07-07-2009 21:40

Re: T.V. licence.
 
got to be honest i agree with nortype, cant see why the hell we should pay fer the BeeB, sorry mancie, i'm agreeing with a tory.:D;)

accyman 08-07-2009 02:43

Re: T.V. licence.
 
yup we live in a country of freedom of choice so if you dont want to watch bbc channels you dont have to pay for a tv licence..

oh hang on a sec i got that wrong

we live in a country where we have freedom of choice except when it comes to teh bbc where even if you dont watch their product we still have to pay for it

i suppose its a bit lik me selling cars and everyone having to pay me for one wether they want it or not because the govenment says they have to or face fines or going to prison

Tin Monkey 08-07-2009 06:00

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Talking of repeats, I'm sure I've seen this same topic turn up on numerous occasions in the past. :D

Margaret Pilkington 08-07-2009 06:31

Re: T.V. licence.
 
It does look like there is a move to abolish the licence fee, but before you all start cheering, it may be levied from the council tax instead.......at this stage it is just a proposal....but it might just happen.

jaysay 08-07-2009 09:14

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 727180)
Because it is the law......you have to have a licence to receive broadcasts.

And to send over 400 people to cover events like Glaso and Wimbledon and don't forget the 17 employees who earn more than the Prime Minister:(

Tealeaf 08-07-2009 09:30

Re: T.V. licence.
 
...and for the BBC to yesterday cover live an idiotic celebration of the life of some bankrupt middle aged American paedopile on BBC2. On the same day, did either BBC1 or BBC2 cover live the unveiling of the 7/7 memorial in London? No.

Wynonie Harris 08-07-2009 09:40

Re: T.V. licence.
 
...and for Wossy's contract - £18m over three years.

...and for arts supremo Alan Yentob's pension pot - £6.3m.

...and for fomer Director-General, John Birt's leaving do - £150,000.

...oh, the list is endless! :rolleyes:

garinda 08-07-2009 10:08

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 727245)
...and for Wossy's contract - £18m over three years.

...and for arts supremo Alan Yentob's pension pot - £6.3m.

...and for fomer Director-General, John Birt's leaving do - £150,000.

...oh, the list is endless! :rolleyes:

Not forgetting the £60,000 of our money the BBC spent on Tracey Emin's sparrow on top of a tall pole in Liverpool.

Though not so tall that some thieving scousers haven't nicked it
...more than once.

BBC NEWS | UK | England | Merseyside | Emin unveils 'sparrow' sculpture

jaysay 08-07-2009 10:17

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 727249)
Not forgetting the £60,000 of our money the BBC spent on Tracey Emin's sparrow on top of a tall pole in Liverpool.

Though not so tall that some thieving scousers haven't nicked it
...more than once.

BBC NEWS | UK | England | Merseyside | Emin unveils 'sparrow' sculpture

£60,000:eek: is that how much it cost Rindi, I can remember hearing about it, but didn't think it was so much. I know they say art is in the eye of the beholder, whats art to some people is crap to others, but 60k for that out of our money:( their having a larf:eek:

accyman 08-07-2009 13:01

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 727217)
It does look like there is a move to abolish the licence fee, but before you all start cheering, it may be levied from the council tax instead.......at this stage it is just a proposal....but it might just happen.


typical govenment tactic to give with one hand to look good and take away with teh other in a sneaky stealth type way :rolleyes:

Margaret Pilkington 08-07-2009 13:09

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Yes, and while I know there are not many people who do not have a TV set, they will be paying for something they choose not to receive....that can't be right.

I am waiting for them to bring in a licence for broadband access.

nicola68 08-07-2009 13:17

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 727274)
I am waiting for them to bring in a licence for broadband access.

Do you think that is maybe why Gordon Brown wants every household in Britain to have broadband access ????

accyman 08-07-2009 14:19

Re: T.V. licence.
 
iv said before that the bbc asked teh govenment to bring in an internet licence but got refused

now they have established their iplayer after been refused its only a matter of time before they go back asking for an internet licence and argue that the iplayer is now a good enough reason for the govenment to allow one

channel 4 pay for their player by adverts etc do you really think the bbc provide the iplayer for free or at no extra cost ?

i gurentee it is provided as a short term loss where tehy provide it at no extra cost so that it will lead to reaping in more revenue in teh future when an internet licence is enforced

jaysay 08-07-2009 15:59

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 727290)
iv said before that the bbc asked teh govenment to bring in an internet licence but got refused

now they have established their iplayer after been refused its only a matter of time before they go back asking for an internet licence and argue that the iplayer is now a good enough reason for the govenment to allow one

channel 4 pay for their player by adverts etc do you really think the bbc provide the iplayer for free or at no extra cost ?

i gurentee it is provided as a short term loss where tehy provide it at no extra cost so that it will lead to reaping in more revenue in teh future when an internet licence is enforced

Think you might be spot on with that accyman

Eric 08-07-2009 16:49

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 727249)
Not forgetting the £60,000 of our money the BBC spent on Tracey Emin's sparrow on top of a tall pole in Liverpool.

Though not so tall that some thieving scousers haven't nicked it
...more than once.

BBC NEWS | UK | England | Merseyside | Emin unveils 'sparrow' sculpture

Mmmm, "thieving scousers" .... I detect a little syntactical redundancy in this one.:eek:

accyman 08-07-2009 17:11

Re: T.V. licence.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 727305)
Think you might be spot on with that accyman


also an internet licence will just be another thing the public will have to pay for wether or not they watch bbc's website or not.

the BBC is way to powerfull in my opinion and has too much influence over teh govenment if it can get laws passed simply to force us into paying for somthing regardless of if we want it or not.

the bbc shoudl be stripped down to the bare essentials like news and educational programs and have the licence fee cut to a quater of what it is now, any other programs they run should be funded by advertisements or sponsorships so that way they still get funding for educational programs which is what the licence fee is supposedly justified for and any extra programs they shoudl fund themselves so that they are not only made at their expense but will teach them a few things in how to pay realistic wages

there have been many petitions sent to teh govenment both tory and labour govenments signed by hundreds of thousands of people yet it still remains in place and to me that alone says to me that no matter who is in power they will not take any notice of teh majority


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com