![]() |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
I don't think that it is entirely true....about the ideaology anyway. Since the advent of New Labour, the Labour party lost its Socialist roots and became more like the tory party.......there is no true Socialist party anymore...well, not in the terms that could win an election anyway.
You only have to look at the privileged backgrounds of the Labour MP's to check this out....how many of them have true 'working class' backgrounds? Not very many, and those who can be considered to have a bit of a working class background have all attended university. MP's are all wannabe toffs....that is why they can get away with telling us to pull in our belts, while they treat the taxpayer(you and me) as a bottomless pocket....and then look us in the face and lie about doing it. Up the Revolution! |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
The reason why you cannot see the closing of the gap in the ideologies Mancie, is that you haven't lived long enough.
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Maybe if they had not inherited such a financial mess it would not have been necessary.
We will never know what Labour would have done if they had managed to get back for another term of office so it is really all academic. And yes, I do know that governments always blame the last incumbent for their woes....but I would hazard a guess that this government have got the worst deal in living memory....while in my living memory anyway. Mancie we cannot get away from the facts that something has to be done to right the situation.......to cut the deficit.....and we know that there are people on benefits who could work, but won't get out of bed for anything less than they can get for doing nothing....and I resent them living on my earnings.....I do not resent those who have a justifiable reason for claiming benefits.......I resent money going out of this country to support polish children who do not even reside here. You cannot have it all ways when there is nothing to pay for it. |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
Margaret I don't know your age but surely you have seen Governments come and go.. they all blame the "last lot" .. but the Tories make a habit of punishing those less well off for any economic downfall. |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
It isn't supporting one side over the other, it is about basic economics... If you don't have it you can't spend it !! Unfortunately the Labour Government was doing exactly what many private households were doing, getting things on the never never, only problem with that though is that private households have to sort out their own financial problems themselves when the man comes calling, but when the Government do it ........ We know well & good who has to foot the bill then !! You, Me, Everybody has to dig deep, as Newton's third Law pointed out "For every action, there is an equal & opposite reaction" |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
It's not a question of solving anything in three months, it's the proposed intentions. A very swift schedule of taxation was slapped on the table regarding us, the poor minions who live in this country, while the proposal for the banks needs time in order to consider the implications, does it? You're still dodging the issue of why the 'coalition' aren't doing what they said they would do when they were in opposition. What has changed? |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Mancie I am 63 and retired...so yes I have seen governments come and go.
In my opinion Tony Blair did more to bring this country to its knees than the Germans. Ok he did it in a different way, but nevertheless he did it. Prudence Brown promised no more boom and bust but sold off the gold reserves when we didn't actually need the money and that meant that when we did need the money there was nothing in the pot. So when the doo-doo hit the fan he went into borrowing mode. I have said it before and will say it as many times as is necessary.....we cannot have what can't be paid for. I have worked all of my life. Paid into the system all of my life, am still paying taxes on my pension(and it isn't a big pension)......if the bus passes are to go, if the heating allowance is to go, then I will(like others) have to live with it. I won't like it, but I will know it is necessary. As long as the lard lumps who can't raise themselves out of their pits are going to feel it too, as long as the people who have paid absolutely nothing into the system are going to be targetted then I will manage. I have been poor.....I know how to make do and mend. |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
John, I retired in 2002, at the age of 55.....I could have worked on until i was 60, but to be honest I was thoroughly fed up of government meddling, target chasing and the like.
I loved my job and felt privileged to be doing it. I worked hard because that is the only way I know. I taught student nurses and tried to pass on my enthusiasm for caring for patients, but increasingly it seemed that the young women and men coming into the profession had a different focus......and it wasn't on care giving, it was about forging a career. There is nothing wrong with forging a career per se it just has to be balanced with care giving. It seemed to me(MHO) that many of the new University educated intakes felt that taking patients to the toilet, or feeding patients, or dealing with personal hygiene needs were below them. Patients reveal their fears and their worries to the people who give such intimate care. Now I am glad to be out of it....though I am always happy when past patients recognise me and remember me...which frequently happens. |
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
Quote:
|
Re: £260m 'wasted' in axing school building plans
The last Tory government left power with unemployment higher than they inherited, and it was under that lot that unemployment reached record heights: at the time I worked in a Jobcentre and it was painfully obvious to all of us that the figures were a huge underestimate. Every time they changed the way we counted unemployment (more than 20 times in 5 years) the figure went down for a month before creeping back up.
It could be argued that the parties set each other up to fail: you'll notice that when parties know they will win an election they go to the country within 4 years, when they know they'll lose they go the full 5. And of course every party makes decisions with an eye to the vote and staying in power, rather than what is right. So go for the "benefit scroungers" worth maybe £5bn according to the latest (probably inflated) estimates, not for the tax dodgers worth far more - government estimate, £40bn, pundit estimate, over £70bn. Ideologically all of the parties have lurched to the right. Since Cleggie became the leader of the LibDems the party has lurched so far to the right it's almost as Tory as the Tories. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com