![]() |
The primary duty of every Government-Trident
'The primary duty of every Government is the defence of its citizens'. Can't remember who said that, although David Cameron said something similar recently.
So with that duty in mind, our Defence Minister has decided to put off a decision on the Trident replacement until 2015! Not because we don't need it, not because we can't afford it and not because there is no hurry. He's done it,he says quite openly, because it will EMBARRASS the Labour Party when they have to vote FOR it with the Tories just before the next election and presumably may lose them votes! Can we trust a man so petty to be in charge of our defence? Who let a Liberal Democrat become our Defence Minister? They don't believe in defence do they? Both main parties agree(whether we all do or not) that Trident must be replaced. To lose 5 years of design, developement and progress, together with the cost of maintaining Trident beyond its planned life just to embarrass another party is the height of irresponsibility and a typical decision of the Lib Dems when they weren't in power. Now they have some power but still haven't grown up. Should this man keep his job? |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
It`s ok for them as they don`t have to stand in line to defend the united kingdom when open war starts
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
was also on the news tonight that next year our lads will have 100s of the new heavily armored land vehicles, hang on how long have our lads been out yon? when are we supposed to be withdrawing?:rolleyes::(
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Nuclear weapons might be unusable if this reuters report is to be believed
U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects | Reuters |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
It`s took them long enough to figure out how to overcome I.E.D.`s :confused: |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
There has never been a weapon invented which wasn't fully used(however unpleasant it was).The human race is a nasty species and one day another madman will arise and we will have another World War. In 10/20 years when the future 'Taliban Government of Pakistan' finally has a missile which can reach Europe(to go with the nuclear warheads Pakistan already has) or Iran gets the warhead to go with its missiles do you think they will hesitate to threaten with them AND use them? Our only defence will be to say 'We will do unto others as they have done unto us' and ensure they know the cost to them would be so great that it wouldn't be worth it. That's the MAD policy which kept the peace between the West and the USSR for so many years, unpalatable but true.
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
But why the Trident System. The RAF are capable of hitting any target from an aircraft at significantly lower cost of transport vehicle than a Trident armed submarine. They can also do it more accurately with Laser Designation.
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
The Con-Dems proposed cuts of 36 billion in the defence budget include reductions in Tornado F3 air defence aircraft and Harrier GR7s, and early phasing out of Nimrod MR1/MR2 surveillance aircraft. A number of RAF bases will be earmarked for closure. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
It would be interesting to see a list of how much each of our European allies are spending on Trident or its equivalent. Just as it would be nice to see a list of how many troops each of our European allies has at the moment in Afghanistan.
I am all for defending ourselves, but I sometimes think the UK carries more of the burden of defending the "Free World" than other countries. If the likes of France, Germany, Italy and Spain are spending billions on Trident, then so should we. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
Country Troops
30 July 2009, Thursday |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
Thanks, Dave. I think the figures prove that the other countries are taking the p*ss out of us. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
RAF bases have been closing since I joined in '61 - post National Service. On TV last night learnt that UK Air Defernce is now centred at RAF Scampton - it used to be a V-Bomber Base (Vulcans, I think). Change has been a way of life in the RAF since Pontius was a Pilate. Changing threats, changing equipment and technology. Have not always agreed with it, but that is the way it has gone. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
You can't rely on a defence system which, while cheap, may not be effective. You might as well save the money and become a Lib/Dem. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
Troops deployed Deaths to date % Losses USA 62000 935 1.5% UK 9000 292 3.2% Germany 0nly-4050 33 0.8% France Only-3160 38 1.2% Canada Only 2800 But 129 4.6% Italy Only 2795 20 0.7% (but they don't really like fighting,do they?) Denmark ONLY 700 BUT 30 4.28% Some of our NATO allies have lost more men to suicides,friendly fire and accidents (oh and lightening strikes )than to the enemy. So can you work out whos troops are in Helmand and Kandahar Provinces and who are staying in the quiet parts, having quite a good time apparently? You bet you can! |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
Against who? Who will threaten us with a nuclear strike or even an overwhelming conventional attack in 10/20 years time? We couldn't even defend the Falklands now! Who may decide to use the UK to send a message to the world? We don't know but probably not Eire! But Iran, a Taliban controlled Pakistan, the future Chinese Empire, a new Russia rich on oil and gas? When the water, minerals, food, oil, gas and space begin to run out in the near future who knows who may decide they need the British Isles but not the British? At least we would be able to say 'Don't bother, we're not worth the cost.' |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
If the countries that now possess even more destructive nuclear weapons , and more countries come to possess them , there will sure come a time when some nutter uses them . If this accelerates into a full-scale nuclear war it will be good-bye planet earth . I'm thinking of all the folks of future generations who inhabit the earth . |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Don't forget, nuclear weapons, in responsable hands, are a deterent not a weapon. No sane nation would ever use them to attack, only to defend! But if it hadn't been for them we'd probably be speaking Russian now, if we were speaking at all. The USA would never have got into a conventional war to defend Europe but the MAD policy ensured they didn't need to.
But INSANE nations,rogue states, unbalanced leaders? You haven't enough fingers to count them on, even at the moment and some are already going nuclear. In the future? We need to be able to say 'Please don't use that thing on us or we'll get upset'. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
what determines responsible hands is debatable! whats beyond doubt is the fact that real nutters try consistently n always will, to develop nuclear weapons, so saying that us or any reasonably civilized nation should not have em as a deterrent is naive to me.
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
I'd say all this debate means nothing.. fact is that defence will be cut by over 30% .this means cuts in troops on the ground,the Navy,the RAF every area of defence...these cuts are not sort term and not high profile..they are typical cuts in defence the Tories have always done..and may only be realised when this country comes under serious threat .. by that time it could be to late for any re-arming.
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Cuts.... Mancie you forget the big one in 2006 by your lord and master Saint Tony.
Yes the then Labour government decided in their wisdom to retire the Royal Navy's fleet of Sea Harriers, the last one being decommisioned on 29th March 2006. This was done to make space for the JSF, which was due in 2012. Being a Aviator and taking to those in the forces about this I will not repeat what the nick name for JSF is, but the middle word is not Strike, it rhymes with height. So this has left our Royal Navy, the greatest Navy in the world with out Air support. Now that is okay for anywhere that is land locked and we can get jets in, but what would we do if we had to defend the Falklands again???? So HMS Ark Royal, HMS Illustrious and HMS Invincible, which was mothballed by the same people, have no aircraft and therefore are about as much use a a chocolate fireguard. 70 years ago this month, Britain would have been invaded but for the air superiority we managed to keep over the Luftwaffe, I think this is a bit more important than the debate about Trident. But of course it knocks Labour and we cannot have that can we. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Oh and one other thing, who broke the covernent with our armed forces? Your beloved Labour.
So Mancie I await your usual intelligent reply. |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Quote:
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
Love this .. an acquaintance has been involved in it and had to fight her feelings against unmanned war ethics against technology:
Taranis: The £143million unmanned stealth jet that will be hit targets in another continent | Mail Online |
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
no ethics at all to me in unmanned war, no begger on our side should get killed.
|
Re: The primary duty of every Government-Trident
"It can be controlled from anywhere in the world with satellite communications"
Of course the first targets in a global, or even regional, conflict will probably be communications satellites |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com