Accrington Web - Con/dems v Labour

Page 3 of 4

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - Con/dems v Labour (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/con-dems-v-labour-56571.html)

garinda

27-01-2011 18:57

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Cleggs currently on ITV. (Tonight- North/south Divide.)

He's dyed his hair a rather unnatural shade of 'McCartney conker'.

:eek:

The die is cast.

The begining of the end, for the coalition.

accysimon

27-01-2011 19:25

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 878390)

accysimon, did you even bother to read my post!!!! let me reiterate it for you.
Gordon Brown as Chancellor did:

and I am meant to be grateful for that!!!!!
Rose tinted glasses.

Did you not read my post, or would you have been happy to lose your own personal savings?

JCB	27-01-2011 19:31

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878515)

The begining of the end, for the coalition.

How many times have I heard that ?

I think I said it myself the day after the coalition was formed .

Sorry but we will have to get used to it .

I used to think differently , but the alternative is not a real alternative .

Lib/Con/Lab , yes they're all in it together , locally and nationally .

garinda

27-01-2011 19:35

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 878388)

How can 'we all be in it together' when over half a dozen cabinet members are millionaires in their own right?

Further, most people on here musn't have had any savings in the banks, otherwise they would have been grateful that the Labour Government bailed them out and saved their money. They would have been complaining if they'd lost it all, the banks all collapsed and the government had done nothing, so how can they win?

Yes the last government did bail the banks out.

Sadly showing yet more stupidity, that no conditions and clauses were attached.

Thus allowing the banks, now part nationalised, to carry on paying their fat-cat executives massively obscene bonuses.

:rolleyes:

garinda

27-01-2011 19:38

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCB (Post 878521)

How many times have I heard that ?

I don't know.

How many times have seen the Politican's Bad Dye Jobs thread?

garinda

27-01-2011 19:41

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCB (Post 878521)

Sorry

Never apologise.

Never apologise. Unless you have something to apologise for.

;)

Bernard Dawson

27-01-2011 19:44

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878515)

Cleggs currently on ITV. (Tonight- North/south Divide.)

He's dyed his hair a rather unnatural shade of 'McCartney conker'.

:eek:

The die is cast.

The begining of the end, for the coalition.

He's dyed he's hair.That proves it, he is a Tory.

garinda

27-01-2011 19:50

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 878529)

He's dyed he's hair.That proves it, he is a Tory.

Never say dye! Puzzle over Blair's hair | Mail Online

No comment.

:rofl38::rofl38::rofl38:

Bernard Dawson

27-01-2011 19:57

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878532)

Never say dye! Puzzle over Blair's hair | Mail Online

No comment.

:rofl38::rofl38::rofl38:

Don't believe it G, its nowt but Tory propaganda.

garinda

27-01-2011 19:59

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 878537)

Don't believe it G, its nowt but Tory propaganda.

I knew the Mail link wouldn't wash.

Unlike Tony's colour.

:D

jaysay

28-01-2011 09:31

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 878537)

Don't believe it G, its nowt but Tory propaganda.

The last government was run on propaganda, it only went belly up when Alistair did a runner when he could see the mucky stuff was about to hit the fan, and they'd be found out:rolleyes:

Less	28-01-2011 13:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 878586)

The last government was run on propaganda, it only went belly up when Alistair did a runner when he could see the mucky stuff was about to hit the fan, and they'd be found out:rolleyes:

and what sort of 'ganda' is the present government running on?

Goosie, goosie?

garinda

28-01-2011 14:11

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 878612)

and what sort of 'ganda' is the present government running on?

Goosie, goosie?

Phonetappers & Shunters, Public Relation.

:rolleyes::D

Less	28-01-2011 14:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 878615)

Phonetappers & Shunters, Public Relation.

:rolleyes::D

It's usually Jay that I tease about spelling, but shouldn't that read...
Phonetappers & Shafters, Public Relation?

jaysay

28-01-2011 17:53

Re: Con/dems v Labour

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 878618)

It's usually Jay that I tease about spelling, but shouldn't that read...
Phonetappers & Shafters, Public Relation?

Oh come on less give somebody else a chance:D

All times are GMT. The time now is 17:31.

Page 3 of 4

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page