Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 906708)

Eric, there will always be ladies of dubious reputation who will do what they can to feather their nest(no pun intended).......and these stupid footballers/actors/celebs think with what is in their pants pocket...they should be able to spot them coming a mile off....with their cleavage showing and their puddings boiling over.......if they didn't get into the situation in the first place, then there would be no chance of them being held to ransom.

Yes, there still is a law against blackmail, but I think in this situation they deserve all they get.......I can find no sympathy in my heart for them......for their wives,perhaps, for their children certainly, but for these guys who can't keep it in their drawers.......Not a chance!

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

with their cleavage showing and their puddings boiling over

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 906742)

Yerself, you must associate with some very strange women........I thought ferrets were those little hairy stoat like things........I have never seen a woman with furry boobs....you must let me know where you hang out and then I can come and have a look.
NO.........only joking :)

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 906742)

Yerself, you must associate with some very strange women........I thought ferrets were those little hairy stoat like things........I have never seen a woman with furry boobs....you must let me know where you hang out and then I can come and have a look.
NO.........only joking :)

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 906807)

what are these gagging orders people are speaking of?

my woman does it of her own free will :confused:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 906843)

Yes these super-injunctions are a rich man's law, but I only have a problem with the ones that conceal hypocrisy on the part of the person seeking the injunction. If, for example, they are in a position of power arguing about how the rest of us should live our lives, while they are doing something contrary to that in private, then I have no sympathy with them.

The names I've seen bandied about on Twitter (footballers, actors, comedians etc) are people who, in the main are trying to protect themselves from tabloid gossip and tittle tattle, and I say good luck to them if they can put a stop to it.

Originally Posted by mick (Post 906847)

I think we could do with Gagging orders on accyweb too:D:D:p

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 906843)

Yes these super-injunctions are a rich man's law, but I only have a problem with the ones that conceal hypocrisy on the part of the person seeking the injunction. If, for example, they are in a position of power arguing about how the rest of us should live our lives, while they are doing something contrary to that in private, then I have no sympathy with them.

The names I've seen bandied about on Twitter (footballers, actors, comedians etc) are people who, in the main are trying to protect themselves from tabloid gossip and tittle tattle, and I say good luck to them if they can put a stop to it.