![]() |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
When you define which risk has greater or lesser priority, why did you not take into account that the only fire known to have ocurred in my block was caused by a night intruder? Other questions have also been raised here. We have never been given a reason why our properties have not been brought up to Decent Homes Standard - we should have been told that the programmed schedule of works was no longer going to happen, and why. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
If you want a response on the Decent Homes programme contact Hyndburn Homes Asset Management Section |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
This appears to be buck passing between HH and the fire service.
We can only judge and allocate blame based on our experiences of contact with both of you. When we approached the fire service directly we were visited by two senior officers and the locking facility was restored with surprising speed. I appreciate that there was some risk with the locks we had, and deduce that you were ready to expose us to an alternative (we consider a greater) risk from intruders if it did not involve expense. I would like to know how soon all of us will have locks. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
As you're doing an appalling job, public relations wise, on here. Since you've chosen an anonymous username on this forum, yet seem to talk with some authority on behalf of Hyndburn Homes, would it not be good manners to at least give your position and title with them, if you'd rather not give your name? |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Don't some houses owned by Hyndburn Homes have porches, presumably with a lock on an inner and outer door?
Are the fire service going to do a risk assesment on these homes, and subsequently someone from Hyndburn Homes will come along to remove one lock, to prevent people having to scrabble about with two keys if the toaster sets alight? |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Has anyone yet got round to the questions of who fitted the old locks, why that design was chosen and when were they fitted?
|
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
According to this - http://www.lga.gov.uk/lga/tio/18055650 "The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 („the FSO‟), which came into force in October 2006, brought the common parts of blocks of flats within the scope of mainstream fire safety legislation for the first time" I have not had time to peruse this doc in depth. When I do, I will report anything relevant here. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
Mind you, there was less chance of a druggie shooting up and setting themselves on fire in the seventies. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
I reason that due to the 'single brick, no cavity' walls in the stairwells. It wouldn't be logical to expose such walls to weather. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
You just walked in to the communal hall. I used to visit someone there in the seventies and early eighties. Though they had anti-social behaviour then, because there were no locks, mainly from people wandering in there drunk. A stupid decision to have easy access to any passing undesirable, then, as now. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
HH is a small organisation, If I gave my position it would be easy to guess. Sorry if you feel that way John but it is true. |
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn Homes - security compromised.
Quote:
I just politely asked you the questions that many on here were asking. You have no need to give your position away, I know exactly who you are. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com