Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Full Council - 22nd September 2011 (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/full-council-22nd-september-2011-a-59284.html)

Ken Moss 19-09-2011 22:03

Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
The next meeting of the full council is this Thursday at Accrington Town Hall at 7.00pm. As always, it is open to the public to come and watch from the gallery and a full list of agenda items can be found here:

Council

garinda 23-09-2011 20:11

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Hyndburn Council Walkout - YouTube

This reminds me of when Googie Withers left the prison for the last time, in Within These Walls.

Tealeaf 24-09-2011 09:04

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
So how long has filming been allowed at council meetings?

garinda 24-09-2011 09:12

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 935700)
So how long has filming been allowed at council meetings?

Don't know, but it was the Observer who posted it on YouTube.

Tealeaf 24-09-2011 09:17

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 935702)
Don't know, but it was the Observer who posted it on YouTube.

Presumably the same reporter who who doing the twitter updates.

I wonder if he'll be at the next meeting?

gynn 24-09-2011 12:29

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Hyndburn - An Excellent Council...........

shillelagh 24-09-2011 12:35

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
as far as im concerned thats rude ... if someone has been invited to speak at the meeting then they should have stayed ... even if they didnt agree with it .. its bad manners ... oh and if it had been the other way round ... and the labour councillors had walked out i would have said the same ...

Ken Moss 24-09-2011 12:41

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
The walkout was in response to a presentation by Brian Simpson MEP who had come to give a presentation on how European decisions affect things in Hyndburn. Given my comparative ignorance of how some things are connected I found it quite interesting and it is useful to get a glimpse of the bigger picture in order to help me be a better councillor. I doubt whether the same tactics would have been employed if a certain Mr Hargreaves had still been local MP and invited along to speak.

I'm disappointed with the Conservative group, shepherded once again into leaving the chamber by Cllr Britcliffe, as several questions were raised over the course of the evening that Mr Simpson was well placed to answer.

We should be encouraging links between district, county and parliamentary levels in order to enable a better flow of information but this seems to be at odds with what the local Conservatives want. Personally speaking, whatever colour flag our local government representatives are flying we should try as far as we can to hear each other out. I note with interest that the only person reported to have turned down an invite to speak at Full Council is Conservative County Council Leader Geoff Driver.

Greater transparency, anyone?

Ken Moss 24-09-2011 12:44

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 935703)
Presumably the same reporter who who doing the twitter updates.

I wonder if he'll be at the next meeting?

As far as I'm concerned they can film the whole thing, much as they do at several other local councils. I'm not sure how interested the local populace would be but at least it would be a true and uncontestable record of events in the council chamber. Current costings for webcasting stand at around £40,000 per year which is a sticking point.

The issue of podcasting as a cheaper alternative has been raised within the Labour group only this week.

Ken Moss 24-09-2011 12:55

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 935617)
Hyndburn Council Walkout - YouTube

This reminds me of when Googie Withers left the prison for the last time, in Within These Walls.

It's not often you get to see the back of your own head.....cheers, G!

Neil 24-09-2011 16:57

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 935748)
Current costings for webcasting stand at around £40,000 per year which is a sticking point.

The issue of podcasting as a cheaper alternative has been raised within the Labour group only this week.


I think you would get more viewers if it was not live but available to view on the Council website. Would that be cheaper?

I keep saying I will come to one and would like to but we had a mad week with school hunting and Thursday was the first evening we could sit and do nothing.

As it happened I spent the evening killing zombies on a dead island, similar to a council meeting some would say.

Is podcasting just voice? I think thats a bad idea personally. I like to put faces to names.

For the £40k would it be live only or able to view whenever.

It would be nice if I could find minutes online of past meetings.
Are they all available and I am having trouble finding them?

g jones 24-09-2011 22:34

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
A video camera with wide angle lens and mike would surely do? One which records in web format and placed on the Councils website?

My cheapish Sony camera does these.

garinda 24-09-2011 23:10

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
We could have used some of this.

Row flares over £591,000 spent on outdated website | Accrington Observer - menmedia.co.uk

The over half a million quid grant, raised by peoples' taxes, for Hyndburn to have a 'community website'.

Costly website a ?desperate failure? | Accrington Observer - menmedia.co.uk

With the amount of wonga to play with, nevermind full council meetings, we could have had every councillor cammed up 24/7.

If the money hadn't been wasted, we could have had so many cameras at H.B.C. that it would have made Big Brother look unobtrusive.

http://www.xjtalk.com/images/smilies/camera.gif

:rolleyes:

garinda 24-09-2011 23:13

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 935816)
A video camera with wide angle lens and mike would surely do? One which records in web format and placed on the Councils website?

My cheapish Sony camera does these.

But Graham, if you turn up there, we'll only get to see the film you took of them leaving in protest again.

:rolleyes::D

Neil 25-09-2011 00:46

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
If its done it needs to be done properly. We don't want it to look like a small child filmed it with a web cam. That wont give the professional image we expect from our Council.

gynn 25-09-2011 00:56

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 935828)
We don't want it to look like a small child filmed it with a web cam.

Isn't that exactly what the walkout looked like? All that were missing were the toys and the pram.

Neil 25-09-2011 03:07

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 935830)
Isn't that exactly what the walkout looked like? All that were missing were the toys and the pram.

I mentioned elsewhere I can't comment without knowing the reason for the walkout and if this is the usual way to protest in these meetings.

gynn 25-09-2011 06:58

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
It would be interesting to know what happened between 18th July, when the senior members of the Conservative Group agreed proposals for Local Democracy Week (which included the visit of the MEP to the Council meeting) with the Leader of the council at the Leaders Policy Development Board (see item 5)

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa..._July_2011.pdf

and last week when they led a walkout of Conservative members at Council.

Ken Moss 26-09-2011 16:13

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 935779)
I think you would get more viewers if it was not live but available to view on the Council website. Would that be cheaper?

Is podcasting just voice? I think thats a bad idea personally. I like to put faces to names.

For the £40k would it be live only or able to view whenever.

It would be nice if I could find minutes online of past meetings.
Are they all available and I am having trouble finding them?

Podcasting is just audio and would be considerably cheaper. The idea was mooted within the Labour members about approaching one of the local colleges to see if their students would be interested in working with the council on such a scheme.

With webcasting, the footage would be archived online for viewing at any time although with finances the way they are I suspect that Cabinet would not be prepared to find £40k for it at the present time. It must be stressed that no one seems particularly against the idea, at least not within the Labour group.

The previous minutes of full council can be found here:

Council

Neil 26-09-2011 17:13

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Thank you for the info Ken. Is the £40k hosting cost or recording cost?

Ken Moss 26-09-2011 17:14

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 936055)
Thank you for the info Ken. Is the £40k hosting cost or recording cost?

As I understand it, that is the full cost per year for everything.

davemac 29-09-2011 13:46

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
I think filming coucil procedings is an excelent idea, it works for parliament, i watch it on a regular basis especialy PMQ'S.

How do we get £40,000 to film say 12 meetings per year, thats around £3500 per session, you could have it chiseled in granit for that

Tealeaf 29-09-2011 14:42

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
If some clown from the AO can do it for nowt, then I don't see why some of the kids from A & R college can come down, film it and bung it on U tube for a similar amount.

lancsdave 29-09-2011 14:48

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davemac (Post 936662)

How do we get £40,000 to film say 12 meetings per year, thats around £3500 per session, you could have it chiseled in granit for that


£1,000 for the filimg and £39k for processing the paperwork to get the tenders in

Neil 29-09-2011 15:15

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936675)
If some clown from the AO can do it for nowt, then I don't see why some of the kids from A & R college can come down, film it and bung it on U tube for a similar amount.

I would expect better quality if posted by the council that the iphoned clip posted above.

Bernard Dawson 29-09-2011 15:30

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davemac (Post 936662)
I think filming coucil procedings is an excelent idea, it works for parliament, i watch it on a regular basis especialy PMQ'S.

How do we get £40,000 to film say 12 meetings per year, thats around £3500 per session, you could have it chiseled in granit for that

We only have 6 full Council meetings a year now. If anyone wants to see what we get up to they can always come and sit in the gallery.

Tealeaf 29-09-2011 15:51

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 936682)
We only have 6 full Council meetings a year now. If anyone wants to see what we get up to they can always come and sit in the gallery.

A full council meeting is the supreme local legislative authority within the borough.

6 full council meetings each year = 18 hours.

On average, how much does each councillor take home for his/her services?

What does this translate into at an hourly rate, given 18 hours per annum?

lancsdave 29-09-2011 15:51

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 936682)
We only have 6 full Council meetings a year now. If anyone wants to see what we get up to they can always come and sit in the gallery.

Are members of the public allowed to walk out at any time or do they have to be a member of the Conservative Party ? :D

Gayle 29-09-2011 15:52

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
How on earth can it cost £40k to record 6 meetings a year and bung them online?

Allowing for an officers time to be at the meetings - say 4hrs a time - 24 hours.
Then adding a couple of days each time for editing and putting online - 8 hours x 12 - 76 hours.
So 100 hours officer time at £10 maximum = £1,000.

Buying a fairly decent camera and tripod - £1,000.

If it was to be put on the council's own website I suppose you could add something for extra bandwidth but you could stick them on youtube at no cost.

All in all, you could do it easily for under £3k, I reckon.

Bernard Dawson 29-09-2011 16:00

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936688)
A full council meeting is the supreme local legislative authority within the borough.

6 full council meetings each year = 18 hours.

On average, how much does each councillor take home for his/her services?

What does this translate into at an hourly rate, given 18 hours per annum?

Attending full Council meetings is very small part of the work Councillors do.

Gayle 29-09-2011 16:07

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936688)
A full council meeting is the supreme local legislative authority within the borough.

6 full council meetings each year = 18 hours.

On average, how much does each councillor take home for his/her services?

What does this translate into at an hourly rate, given 18 hours per annum?

I've got to defend them on this one. Most (not all) Councillors that I know work really hard for a pittance. I think it's just under £5k a year for the basic allowance. They're on call 24/7 and I know that they get called at all hours of the day. They spend a lot of time at other committee meetings and community meetings and they spend a lot of time working with the officers on various issues. I'd say they don't even make the minimum wage if you want to calculate their actual hourly rate.

davemac 29-09-2011 16:14

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 936682)
We only have 6 full Council meetings a year now. If anyone wants to see what we get up to they can always come and sit in the gallery.

I did allow a surplus of meetings to insert specialy convened meetings and meetings of special interest

Tealeaf 29-09-2011 16:34

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 936696)
Attending full Council meetings is very small part of the work Councillors do.

I'm fully aware of that.

Nevertheless, there is a parallel with the role of an MP.

Sitting in the chamber, asking questions and going through the division lobby is only a small part of the job. Attending committees, dealing with constituent's problems, lobbying for their constituency interests and other roles besides. That is the same role as a councillor, except swap ward for constituency.

The House, however, sits 5 days a week for the best part of a year.

Don't you think, therefore, that the Borough would be better served if our elected local representatives were to meet in full a little bit longer than 18 hours a year?

Here's a little sum.

MP's salary = £65K. Assuming the house meets fully 150 days a year, 8 hours = 1200hrs. £65K divided by 1200 = £54pds per hour.

I'll guess at £8,000pds average allowance for Councillors (I could be way out)

£8,000pds divided by 18 = £444pds per hour.

Draw your own conclusion.

Whittaker 30-09-2011 08:14

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
There really is a misconception that councillors get a lot of money for doing nothing and I am assuming this is what you are getting at most councillors work in full time jobs and then do another 25 - 50 hours per week on average for their wards and the Hyndburn council responsibilities also the calculation has no comparison with the real life of a councillor so I would please make your mind up after checking the daily routine of a local councillor and you are well served in Hyndburn by councillors who work hard on all political sides to help the residents of Hyndburn get the best from the area I have been in this job a short time and have had my eyes opened by the long days that most councillors work for the area so please try and get the facts together before trying to compare and coming up with the wrong answers . we are ellected memebers and beleive what you like but we all work hard to do the best for the areas we represent and "wages" dont come into it we get an allowance and i can tell you in most cases this would not pay for the telephone bill per year . I am not moaning just trying to get accross that people need to get ALL the facts before having a go at the people who are tring to make Hyndburn a better place to live

garinda 30-09-2011 08:22

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Whittaker (Post 936837)
There really is a misconception that councillors get a lot of money for doing nothing and I am assuming this is what you are getting at most councillors work in full time jobs and then do another 25 - 50 hours per week on average for their wards and the Hyndburn council responsibilities also the calculation has no comparison with the real life of a councillor so I would please make your mind up after checking the daily routine of a local councillor and you are well served in Hyndburn by councillors who work hard on all political sides to help the residents of Hyndburn get the best from the area I have been in this job a short time and have had my eyes opened by the long days that most councillors work for the area so please try and get the facts together before trying to compare and coming up with the wrong answers . we are ellected memebers and beleive what you like but we all work hard to do the best for the areas we represent and "wages" dont come into it we get an allowance and i can tell you in most cases this would not pay for the telephone bill per year . I am not moaning just trying to get accross that people need to get ALL the facts before having a go at the people who are tring to make Hyndburn a better place to live

Doesn't come across as 'moaning' at all.

More interesting, as why you wanted to be a councillor, and some of what it entails, that people don't necessarily see.

Whittaker 30-09-2011 10:32

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
I wanted to become a councillor because I hope to be able to make a difference I have been in business for quite a lot of years and have learnt all sorts over the years which I hope to be able to use in the council world my feelings on councillors are they ALL bring something to the table no matter what their political persuasion however what I do feel is that where there are positions on committees within the council they should be filled with the best man or women for the job and not just with the people whom are in political power at the time and this is something that I have tried to get across but looks like it may take a little more discussing and understanding the reasons why, to explain quickly if we had a committee on planning someone with planning experience who holds a council seat should be considered first so that their vast experience can be used when that committee meets when it comes to committees in council political persuasion should really not be important it should be the best person for the job (in my opinion )

Tealeaf 30-09-2011 11:55

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Oi! Whittaker! Have you ever heard of a bloke by the name of Aristophanes of Byzantium? He's the guy who invented punctuation, including the full stop, or period as the Yanks call it. Perhaps you should check up on him and on punctuation because I have rarely read, in either content or language, such drivel as your last post. I hope that you perform somewhat better in your role as a borough councillor than you have just done in this pathetic attempt to justify it.

Ken Moss 30-09-2011 14:02

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 936690)
How on earth can it cost £40k to record 6 meetings a year and bung them online?

Allowing for an officers time to be at the meetings - say 4hrs a time - 24 hours.
Then adding a couple of days each time for editing and putting online - 8 hours x 12 - 76 hours.
So 100 hours officer time at £10 maximum = £1,000.

Buying a fairly decent camera and tripod - £1,000.

If it was to be put on the council's own website I suppose you could add something for extra bandwidth but you could stick them on youtube at no cost.

All in all, you could do it easily for under £3k, I reckon.

Proper webcasting requires just a little more than £1,000 equipment to do it properly and to be honest if we're going to do it at all then I want it to look as near to televised parliamentary debates as possible.

Sound would be the major hurdle as the room would have to be wired up properly and I don't envy anyone that job, particularly when it comes to editing.

Ken Moss 30-09-2011 14:06

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936705)
I'll guess at £8,000pds average allowance for Councillors (I could be way out)

£8,000pds divided by 18 = £444pds per hour.

Draw your own conclusion.

I sit here quietly amused by the public perception, if this post is anything to go by.

Jaysay has summed everything up, I'll refer back to his posts.

£444 per hour.....when's the next election?

Gayle 30-09-2011 14:48

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 936903)
Proper webcasting requires just a little more than £1,000 equipment to do it properly and to be honest if we're going to do it at all then I want it to look as near to televised parliamentary debates as possible.

Sound would be the major hurdle as the room would have to be wired up properly and I don't envy anyone that job, particularly when it comes to editing.

Fair enough. Perhaps I was being a little simplistic. But, I would be interested to know how they reckon it's going to cost £40k a year. Any equipment installation would be a one off. I disagree that the whole room would need to be wired up. I'm fairly sure that the houses of Parliament don't have the whole room wired up, just a mic at each side for each speaker.

As for the Officer's time - I can't see how I could be that far out. Even if I'm being ridiculously generous, I can't see how the cost would be over £10k.

Gayle 30-09-2011 14:53

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936705)
Here's a little sum.

MP's salary = £65K. Assuming the house meets fully 150 days a year, 8 hours = 1200hrs. £65K divided by 1200 = £54pds per hour.

I'll guess at £8,000pds average allowance for Councillors (I could be way out)

£8,000pds divided by 18 = £444pds per hour.

Draw your own conclusion.


I think your figures are a bit out.
Here are my sums.

MPs salary = £65k. Assuming they work 60 hour weeks = £20 per hour.
Councillor's expenses = £5k. Assuming they work about 25 hours a week = £4.80 per hour.

Plus, that doesn't factor in MPs expenses which would bump things up and the out of hours that Councillor's do which would reduce their hourly rate.

Hard working Councillors also pay a lot of out their own pockets that they can't claim back - for example every time they go somewhere they are fleeced for raffle tickets and donations. I suspect they're usually out of pocket!!!!

Whittaker 30-09-2011 14:55

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 936881)
Oi! Whittaker! Have you ever heard of a bloke by the name of Aristophanes of Byzantium? He's the guy who invented punctuation, including the full stop, or period as the Yanks call it. Perhaps you should check up on him and on punctuation because I have rarely read, in either content or language, such drivel as your last post. I hope that you perform somewhat better in your role as a borough councillor than you have just done in this pathetic attempt to justify it.

I do apologise. I am typing on the run. very busy you see. i will try better. please do not take a tone like that i was merely joining in a debate on how councillors work hard and your obvious misconception that we are the best paid people in the world...(full stop)

Ken Moss 30-09-2011 15:10

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 936911)
Fair enough. Perhaps I was being a little simplistic. But, I would be interested to know how they reckon it's going to cost £40k a year. Any equipment installation would be a one off. I disagree that the whole room would need to be wired up. I'm fairly sure that the houses of Parliament don't have the whole room wired up, just a mic at each side for each speaker.

As for the Officer's time - I can't see how I could be that far out. Even if I'm being ridiculously generous, I can't see how the cost would be over £10k.

I can only go by the quotes we have been given for webcasting other councils and that is the average figure. It may well be less than that for HBC but we'd have to look at what potential bills we might be facing.

Parliament is wired up like a Christmas tree and during full debates I imagine the sound engineer really earns his money because someone will have to operate the console and make sure that the right microphone is being recorded otherwise you'd get a real hash. Unless you also had a vision mixer you'd also have a hell of a job editing as each council session goes on a least three hours and you'd need at least three cameras. Bear in mind that this is in my field of work and you'd need someone who knew what they were doing, not just decent equipment.

I'm keen on webcasting but all the gear and no idea wouldn't make for very good viewing.

Gayle 30-09-2011 15:41

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 936916)
I can only go by the quotes we have been given for webcasting other councils and that is the average figure. It may well be less than that for HBC but we'd have to look at what potential bills we might be facing.

Parliament is wired up like a Christmas tree and during full debates I imagine the sound engineer really earns his money because someone will have to operate the console and make sure that the right microphone is being recorded otherwise you'd get a real hash. Unless you also had a vision mixer you'd also have a hell of a job editing as each council session goes on a least three hours and you'd need at least three cameras. Bear in mind that this is in my field of work and you'd need someone who knew what they were doing, not just decent equipment.

I'm keen on webcasting but all the gear and no idea wouldn't make for very good viewing.

I appreciate that you are in that area of business and undoubtedly, you would want the quality and effect to be topnotch i.e. the equivalent of a high quality TV broadcast. However, what is being suggested is that it could be done as a simple webcast, with a fixed camera and only the speakers mic'd up.

Editing would then be straightforward as it would be a case of breaking it down into manageable chunks and posting onto youtube.

We're not asking for high quality TV drama, we're suggesting that we get the content of the meetings made more public.

garinda 30-09-2011 15:51

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 936923)
I appreciate that you are in that area of business and undoubtedly, you would want the quality and effect to be topnotch i.e. the equivalent of a high quality TV broadcast. However, what is being suggested is that it could be done as a simple webcast, with a fixed camera and only the speakers mic'd up.

Editing would then be straightforward as it would be a case of breaking it down into manageable chunks and posting onto youtube.

We're not asking for high quality TV drama, we're suggesting that we get the content of the meetings made more public.

Exactly.

People will tune in perhaps because they can't attend in person.

They won't expect, or need to see some epic cinematic masterpiece.

Eric 30-09-2011 16:29

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Whittaker (Post 936913)
I do apologise. I am typing on the run. very busy you see. i will try better. please do not take a tone like that i was merely joining in a debate on how councillors work hard and your obvious misconception that we are the best paid people in the world...(full stop)


Don't apologise ... it makes him worse ... just ignore; or, better still, get right back in his face;):D Punctuation isn't that important anyway. Bibliographers refer to punctuation as "accidentals" ... in other words, it ain't really all that important. Many great authors, Dickens and Melville among them, left punctuation to their editors ... you know, picky pedants.:)

Gayle 30-09-2011 19:09

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 936916)
I can only go by the quotes we have been given for webcasting other councils and that is the average figure. It may well be less than that for HBC but we'd have to look at what potential bills we might be facing.

Just a thought - but as this is your area of expertise (as you point out), surely you should be the one questioning this quote instead of just accepting it.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss
Bear in mind that this is in my field of work


Neil 30-09-2011 20:23

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 936923)
...... However, what is being suggested is that it could be done as a simple webcast, with a fixed camera and only the speakers mic'd up.....

I don't agree, I think the Council need to present themselves as a professional organisation as always.

I wonder what people would think if the bin wagons were hand painted with a bit of Dulux and a 6" brush to save money?

Ken Moss 01-10-2011 08:36

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 936985)
Just a thought - but as this is your area of expertise (as you point out), surely you should be the one questioning this quote instead of just accepting it.

At any other time possibly, but we need to make so many cuts just to keep on an even keel that it's pointless looking at other areas that will rack up a new bill. I'm truly sorry to talk that way but no matter how many times Peter Britcliffe crows on about the robust financial shape he left the council is I'm afraid he made the odd one or two promises that HBC could never afford to keep so now it looks like Labour are a bunch of niggardly halfwits who can't manage the books.

I would love webcasting but quite honestly even if it cost £10,000 it probably wouldn't happen just now.

Tealeaf 01-10-2011 11:09

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Why not get the money through advertising revenue:

Hyndburn Borough Council Meeting

Brought to you by MacDonalds (Accy Branch)

You never know - you might also get free nosh out of 'em. All the councillors could be captured on film, chomping away on their quarter pounders, while Councillor Britcliffe throws one of his wobblies and storms out. Exciting stuff - better than Corrie.

garinda 01-10-2011 16:56

Re: Full Council - 22nd September 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 937158)
Why not get the money through advertising revenue:

Hyndburn Borough Council Meeting

Brought to you by MacDonalds (Accy Branch)

You never know - you might also get free nosh out of 'em. All the councillors could be captured on film, chomping away on their quarter pounders, while Councillor Britcliffe throws one of his wobblies and storms out. Exciting stuff - better than Corrie.

Could you not hop on a Metropolitan tube train, when you have a spare moment, and check if these people might be interested in sponsoring a H.B.C. webcast?

Wetherspoon House
Central Park
Reeds Crescent
Watford
WD24 4QL

Welcome to J D Wetherspoon, Award-Winning Pubs


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:18.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com