Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!! (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/i-actually-agree-with-a-tory-shock-horror-59922.html)

lindsay ormerod 18-11-2011 17:49

I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Never thought I'd see the day but, hell yes! Backbencher Harriet Baldwin has mooted the idea that child tax credits should be capped at 4 children for familes that have no wage-earner. About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! Unless there are exceptional circumstances, eg you had 2 kids and then had a set of triplets I think that's the way forward. Too many kids think that a life on benefits is an acceptable career choice, time for a change!
:eek:

garinda 18-11-2011 17:54

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Yup, as much as it shocks me too, to say it, I agree.

walkinman221 18-11-2011 17:56

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 949434)
Never thought I'd see the day but, hell yes! Backbencher Harriet Baldwin has mooted the idea that child tax credits should be capped at 4 children for familes that have no wage-earner. About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! Unless there are exceptional circumstances, eg you had 2 kids and then had a set of triplets I think that's the way forward. Too many kids think that a life on benefits is an acceptable career choice, time for a change!
:eek:

Spot on linds, also think if the family has no wage earner and are being paid tax credits that are greater than your annual salary they probably be also getting council tax benefit ,housing benefit , jobseekers allowance the list goes on :confused:

garinda 18-11-2011 18:09

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
The lucky breeders.

jaysay 18-11-2011 18:30

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 949434)
Never thought I'd see the day but, hell yes! Backbencher Harriet Baldwin has mooted the idea that child tax credits should be capped at 4 children for familes that have no wage-earner. About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! Unless there are exceptional circumstances, eg you had 2 kids and then had a set of triplets I think that's the way forward. Too many kids think that a life on benefits is an acceptable career choice, time for a change!
:eek:

I remember a few years ago Lindsay, a young child was knocked down and killed in Ossy, she was one child in a family of seven kids, the only thing the feckless father could say was he'd lose the child benefit, this is certainly the way forward

cashman 18-11-2011 18:52

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
think linds thread has perhaps drawn summat very ironic out, the first 3 to respond,plus me, probably have socialist leanings? but cos its right we agree wi this torys words, that to me is true democracy, summat me owd mate jaysay has yet to grasp.:rolleyes::D

walkinman221 18-11-2011 18:56

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949469)
think linds thread has perhaps drawn summat very ironic out, the first 3 to respond,plus me, probably have socialist leanings? but cos its right we agree wi this torys words, that to me is true democracy, summat me owd mate jaysay has yet to grasp.:rolleyes::D

Spot on brother:alright:

jaysay 18-11-2011 19:01

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by walkinman221 (Post 949472)
Spot on brother:alright:

Din't know you two were related WM:rolleyes:

Less 18-11-2011 19:03

Yes it does seem right,
However there are some folk that only seem to have to drop their kecks and she's preggers again!
So long as they are prepared to contribute & not take advantage, I say, welcome to the world junior, may you go on to be another Faraday.

jaysay 18-11-2011 19:03

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949469)
think linds thread has perhaps drawn summat very ironic out, the first 3 to respond,plus me, probably have socialist leanings? but cos its right we agree wi this torys words, that to me is true democracy, summat me owd mate jaysay has yet to grasp.:rolleyes::D

The thing is cashy I've never heard a socialist put out forward that made sense, if I had I'd probably agreed wi um;):rolleyes::D

cmonstanley 18-11-2011 19:08

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
i agree as well but diagree with this The Green Benches: Tory plans to force 50,000 disabled youth to work for companies such as Sainsbury's & Tesco's unpaid. ;)

walkinman221 18-11-2011 19:10

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949473)
Din't know you two were related WM:rolleyes:

Not quite but not far off actually.

Margaret Pilkington 18-11-2011 19:12

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Well of course you do C'mon......But you don't make any comment.
And you agreeing with something Tory...are you not well or something?

Less 18-11-2011 19:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949475)
The thing is cashy I've never heard a socialist put out forward that made sense, if I had I'd probably agreed wi um;):rolleyes::D

The reason you've never heard such a thing is because whenever anyone talks sense, you run around in circles with your fingers in your ears shouting, 'La, La, I don't want to know'.

lancsdave 18-11-2011 19:16

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
I agree with it, but as we all know what politicians say and what they actually do are planets apart

garinda 18-11-2011 19:48

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949469)
think linds thread has perhaps drawn summat very ironic out, the first 3 to respond,plus me, probably have socialist leanings? but cos its right we agree wi this torys words, that to me is true democracy, summat me owd mate jaysay has yet to grasp.:rolleyes::D

How very dare you.

Speak to Mancie.

Politically I'm supposedly to the right of Attila the Hun.

:rolleyes:

http://snesorama.us/board/images/smilies/communist.gif

garinda 18-11-2011 19:51

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949478)

Do you get Green Shield stamps?

Retlaw 18-11-2011 20:01

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949478)

More profit fo Sainbury's & Tesco, 50,000 unpaid slaves, could mean 50,000 more being laid off.
BUT if Sainsbury's & Tesco, can find work for those 50,000 slaves, without affecting the existing work force, why have'nt they employed them in the first place.
Retlaw.

cmonstanley 18-11-2011 20:44

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
because theyve been making people redundant to fit these people in:eek: tesco redundancies - Google Search only in tory britain thats 350,000 thats been taken off the benefit statistics;)

cashman 18-11-2011 20:52

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949475)
The thing is cashy I've never heard a socialist put out forward that made sense, if I had I'd probably agreed wi um;):rolleyes::D

See yer telling porkies again.:rolleyes: i quoted yer comment on the "Metal Theft" thread the other day.

cmonstanley 18-11-2011 21:01

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
because they are shipped out to private providers who dont show up on official statistics so whats the real figures are they even worse that they are letting on.

garinda 18-11-2011 21:12

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949511)
because they are shipped out

A cruise?

I'll sign up to be a slave, if they get a free cruise.

gynn 18-11-2011 21:26

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 949497)
Do you get Green Shield stamps?

For younger readers (anyone under 30):

Green Shield Stamps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cashman 18-11-2011 21:35

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949478)

If yeh agree ok, but why not start a thread on yer other gripe, instead of deflecting yer agreement,?:rolleyes:

wallop79 18-11-2011 23:23

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 949434)
Never thought I'd see the day but, hell yes! Backbencher Harriet Baldwin has mooted the idea that child tax credits should be capped at 4 children for familes that have no wage-earner. About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! Unless there are exceptional circumstances, eg you had 2 kids and then had a set of triplets I think that's the way forward. Too many kids think that a life on benefits is an acceptable career choice, time for a change!
:eek:

Should be capped at 2 or maybe 3, contraceptives are free of charge so there's no excuse (although they're not 100% effective) why after 2nd or 3rd child you shouldnt provide fully for the child instead of bleeding government coffers dry. If you're gonna breed'em you feed'em. But one massive loophole that should be closed which would save millions, stop paying child tax credits to parents who's children aren't even living in the UK.

cmonstanley 19-11-2011 08:43

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
as i agree with this policy there is no way they could implement this they have sacked half the staff:confused::confused:

MargaretR 19-11-2011 08:52

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949577)
as i agree with this policy there is no way they could implement this they have sacked half the staff:confused::confused:

I agree - any change in the law needs civil servants to implement it.
The standard way to avoid that is to pay an enormous sum to some computer software company to design a programme to do it - which has turned out to be an expensive disaster too many times.

jaysay 19-11-2011 09:16

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 949485)
The reason you've never heard such a thing is because whenever anyone talks sense, you run around in circles with your fingers in your ears shouting, 'La, La, I don't want to know'.

No need Less cuz its never happened, everything Labour ever put their fingers on usually turns to dust AKA the UK economy whenever they're in control;)

jaysay 19-11-2011 09:18

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 949495)
How very dare you.

Speak to Mancie.

Politically I'm supposedly to the right of Attila the Hun.

:rolleyes:

http://snesorama.us/board/images/smilies/communist.gif

And they don't come much more to the right than that;)

jaysay 19-11-2011 09:21

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949511)
because they are shipped out to private providers who dont show up on official statistics so whats the real figures are they even worse that they are letting on.

Na come on where's the link to this drivel was it published in the friday edition of the Morning Star;)

jaysay 19-11-2011 09:23

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 949581)
I agree - any change in the law needs civil servants to implement it.
The standard way to avoid that is to pay an enormous sum to some computer software company to design a programme to do it - which has turned out to be an expensive disaster too many times.

Ya the NHS and Passport controll, are but two

MargaretR 19-11-2011 09:24

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
.. and the Child Support Agency fiasco was the biggest

cashman 19-11-2011 09:25

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949508)
See yer telling porkies again.:rolleyes: i quoted yer comment on the "Metal Theft" thread the other day.

Yer as bad as Graham fer avoiding the issue.:rofl38::rofl38::rofl38:

Benipete 19-11-2011 09:31

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 949434)
Never thought I'd see the day but, hell yes! Backbencher Harriet Baldwin has mooted the idea that child tax credits should be capped at 4 children for familes that have no wage-earner. About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! Unless there are exceptional circumstances, eg you had 2 kids and then had a set of triplets I think that's the way forward. Too many kids think that a life on benefits is an acceptable career choice, time for a change!
:eek:

I'd go further and cap It at two.:)

cashman 19-11-2011 09:47

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benipete (Post 949601)
I'd go further and cap It at two.:)

agree 100%

jaysay 19-11-2011 09:48

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benipete (Post 949601)
I'd go further and cap It at two.:)

Well they do in China Beni, the only difference in China is if you have more than two they shoot you:D

walkinman221 19-11-2011 09:51

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949611)
Well they do in China Beni, the only difference in China is if you have more than two they shoot you:D

And then bill the family for the bullet:D

jaysay 19-11-2011 10:21

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by walkinman221 (Post 949614)
And then bill the family for the bullet:D

That's why they've a thriving economy WM:D they sell a lot of bullets:rolleyes:

cmonstanley 19-11-2011 15:51

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949591)
Na come on where's the link to this drivel was it published in the friday edition of the Morning Star;)

dont need links see it everyday ;)

jaysay 19-11-2011 19:45

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949706)
dont need links see it everyday ;)

What with them red blinkers on, do me a favour:rolleyes:

Neil 19-11-2011 22:22

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 949434)
About time too, I've seen several instances where a families tax credits award is greater than my annual wage! .....

What about capping the amount of benefits that can be claiming instead?

Not really thought about the implications of that, it just popped into my tiny mind when I read your comment above.

wallop79 19-11-2011 22:39

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 949830)
What about capping the amount of benefits that can be claiming instead?

Not really thought about the implications of that, it just popped into my tiny mind when I read your comment above.

Neil that bill is before parliament right now, benefits will not be as we know them now, there all gonna be called universal credits. It's the biggest shake up in welfare reform that's ever happened, and about damn time too.

cmonstanley 19-11-2011 22:57

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
lets hope not the biggest cock up and dont forget the biggest outsourcing will b e the private firm who make the decision if your eligable for a sick note;) BBC News - GPs should 'not sign off long-term sick' the decisions have already been made Universal credit - Disability Alliance Factsheet F55 and i wonder what firm will get the contract.

cmonstanley 19-11-2011 22:58

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949782)
What with them red blinkers on, do me a favour:rolleyes:

first hand ;)

cashman 19-11-2011 23:03

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Gotta say its a ridiculous state of affairs, if they take that away from the docs,then the only people qualified to make that descision,should be "Specialists" in whatever field is relevant, i'm all fer nailing the dodgers, but genuine people are already suffering now, but they omit to tell yeh that, in fact we had that very discussion this afternoon.:mad:

cmonstanley 19-11-2011 23:21

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
wonder how many deaths this will be responsible for by forcing people back to work with mental health issues.first it was care in the community now its care in the work place:

Neil 19-11-2011 23:28

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wallop79 (Post 949833)
Neil that bill is before parliament right now, benefits will not be as we know them now, there all gonna be called universal credits. It's the biggest shake up in welfare reform that's ever happened, and about damn time too.


Do you know what the general idea of it will be?

garinda 20-11-2011 04:26

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949838)
the biggest outsourcing will b e the private firm who make the decision if your eligable for a sick note

Thought you'd be applauding that.

All those jobs being created.

Millions unemployed etc.

garinda 20-11-2011 04:33

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949845)
first it was care in the community

Hasn't that been a success?

We've welcomed you to our communal bosom.

Loooked after, and cared for you.

Made sure you've come to no harm.

Warned you to stay safely at a distance, when the dog stabbers have been wandering our streets.

jaysay 20-11-2011 09:01

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 949830)
What about capping the amount of benefits that can be claiming instead?

Not really thought about the implications of that, it just popped into my tiny mind when I read your comment above.

Think its in the pipeline Neil, £500 a week, the point being that it adds up to £25,000 per annum, there are people going out to work to keep their families not get £25,000 a year, so why should people who are not going out to work be better off

jaysay 20-11-2011 09:04

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949842)
Gotta say its a ridiculous state of affairs, if they take that away from the docs,then the only people qualified to make that descision,should be "Specialists" in whatever field is relevant, i'm all fer nailing the dodgers, but genuine people are already suffering now, but they omit to tell yeh that, in fact we had that very discussion this afternoon.:mad:

In fact is, according to most doctors they are in agreement, a doctor on TV this morning said she was sued because she wanted a patient to return to work and they didn't want too

wallop79 20-11-2011 09:06

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 949848)
Do you know what the general idea of it will be?

Having read about the tax credits side of it at work, the tax credit part will close loopholes for fraud (hopefully), instead of as it is now telling HMRC how much you are going to earn for the coming year, they are going to be liasing with your employer on a monthly basis, so if your wages alter each month (either up or down) then your tax credits for that month will compensate. Basically as it says below they want people to work instead of having a welfare based state, and in theory take more children out of poverty. JSA & IS pay the same amount of money so there wont be any real changes there I dont think. ESA will be all about as it is now to try & get people back to work, the old ethos of I cant do that, I used to work as ... doesn't work anymore, its not what you cant do anymore but what you can do. I dont know whats going to happen to DLA, or carers allowance that I will have to read up on. But housing benefit & I think also council tax benefit will also come under the heading of universal credits.

Principles for reform

1. We would propose to use a set of principles to guide reform. They could be to:
  • ensure that people can see that the clear rewards from taking all types of work outweigh the risks;
  • further incentivise and encourage households and families to move into work and to increase the amount of work they do, by improving the rewards from work at low earnings, and helping them keep more of their earnings as they work harder;
  • increase fairness between different groups of benefit recipients and between recipients and the taxpayer;
  • continue to support those most in need and reduce the numbers of workless households and children in poverty and ensure that interactions with other systems of support for basic needs are considered;
  • promote responsibility and positive behaviour, doing more to reward saving, strengthening the family and, in tandem with improving incentives, reinforcing conditionality;
  • automate processes and maximise self service, to reduce the scope for fraud, error and overpayments. This could include a responsive and immediate service that saves the taxpayer significant amounts of money and ensures compliance costs for employers, at worst, no worse than under the current system; and
  • ensure that the benefits and Tax Credits system is affordable in the short and longer term.

cmonstanley 20-11-2011 11:22

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 949854)
Thought you'd be applauding that.

All those jobs being created.

Millions unemployed etc.

what to give money to private equity firms that cost twice as much it does for civil servants do the same thing isnt saving money.its not creating jobs these jobs were already there but they are doin it on the cheap by being subsidized by the government so they can make ore money that doesnt make sense,that doesnt save money:confused:they are just fiddling the books because it doesnt come up as public spending.

cmonstanley 20-11-2011 11:27

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wallop79 (Post 949889)
Having read about the tax credits side of it at work, the tax credit part will close loopholes for fraud (hopefully), instead of as it is now telling HMRC how much you are going to earn for the coming year, they are going to be liasing with your employer on a monthly basis, so if your wages alter each month (either up or down) then your tax credits for that month will compensate. Basically as it says below they want people to work instead of having a welfare based state, and in theory take more children out of poverty. JSA & IS pay the same amount of money so there wont be any real changes there I dont think. ESA will be all about as it is now to try & get people back to work, the old ethos of I cant do that, I used to work as ... doesn't work anymore, its not what you cant do anymore but what you can do. I dont know whats going to happen to DLA, or carers allowance that I will have to read up on. But housing benefit & I think also council tax benefit will also come under the heading of universal credits.

Principles for reform

1. We would propose to use a set of principles to guide reform. They could be to:
  • ensure that people can see that the clear rewards from taking all types of work outweigh the risks;
  • further incentivise and encourage households and families to move into work and to increase the amount of work they do, by improving the rewards from work at low earnings, and helping them keep more of their earnings as they work harder;
  • increase fairness between different groups of benefit recipients and between recipients and the taxpayer;
  • continue to support those most in need and reduce the numbers of workless households and children in poverty and ensure that interactions with other systems of support for basic needs are considered;
  • promote responsibility and positive behaviour, doing more to reward saving, strengthening the family and, in tandem with improving incentives, reinforcing conditionality;
  • automate processes and maximise self service, to reduce the scope for fraud, error and overpayments. This could include a responsive and immediate service that saves the taxpayer significant amounts of money and ensures compliance costs for employers, at worst, no worse than under the current system; and
  • ensure that the benefits and Tax Credits system is affordable in the short and longer term.

all words how can they do self service wwithout fraud :confused:this means no civil servants just do it online which is the same old tory way say one thing and do the opposite

cashman 20-11-2011 11:31

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 949886)
In fact is, according to most doctors they are in agreement, a doctor on TV this morning said she was sued because she wanted a patient to return to work and they didn't want too

so thats a good reason why a specialist in a field should make the decision,not a panel.

jaysay 20-11-2011 17:34

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 949966)
what to give money to private equity firms that cost twice as much it does for civil servants do the same thing isnt saving money.its not creating jobs these jobs were already there but they are doin it on the cheap by being subsidized by the government so they can make ore money that doesnt make sense,that doesnt save money:confused:they are just fiddling the books because it doesnt come up as public spending.

You do talk a load of bollocks the civil service is and always has been top heave, if they had to run anything in the private sector they'd go bankrupt in 6 months

jaysay 20-11-2011 17:37

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 949969)
so thats a good reason why a specialist in a field should make the decision,not a panel.

Well they will be specialist cashy, specialist in eking out scroungers;)

cmonstanley 20-11-2011 21:26

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 950131)
You do talk a load of bollocks the civil service is and always has been top heave, if they had to run anything in the private sector they'd go bankrupt in 6 months

wrong again it is more expensive to pay the private sector who give a poor service and are subsidized with extra money to let them make a profit.its the railways all over again;)

cashman 20-11-2011 21:28

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 950132)
Well they will be specialist cashy, specialist in eking out scroungers;)

Well if yer daft enough to think that, me family know different.:(

cmonstanley 20-11-2011 21:29

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
yep wrong again as 200,000 civil servants this year alone have lost there jobs

jaysay 21-11-2011 10:14

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 950224)
yep wrong again as 200,000 civil servants this year alone have lost there jobs

1,000,000 were created under the last government at a time when computers were taking the strain out of business, was a bit like if they work for us they'll vote for use, but maybe that's why the country is close on £1 trillion in debt thanks to Labours totally reckless waste of cash:mad::mad:

wallop79 21-11-2011 19:24

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Thing is a hell of a lot of the 200,000 that have been laid off were temporary staff, so not an accurate indication of how many have truly been laid off

cmonstanley 21-11-2011 21:36

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
thats this year most of the fta were paid off last year;)

cmonstanley 21-11-2011 21:39

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 950293)
1,000,000 were created under the last government at a time when computers were taking the strain out of business, was a bit like if they work for us they'll vote for use, but maybe that's why the country is close on £1 trillion in debt thanks to Labours totally reckless waste of cash:mad::mad:

i think your way off the mark ;)

jaysay 22-11-2011 08:59

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 950507)
i think your way off the mark ;)

No sunshine its you thats always way of the mark

cmonstanley 22-11-2011 21:04

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Capita deals with £3.3bn of government spending as more work is outsourced | Politics | The Guardian ;)

wallop79 22-11-2011 21:09

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 950505)
thats this year most of the fta were paid off last year;)

No they weren't, they were laid off this year not last, I should know & if I'm right in thinking I know who you are, you know most fta's were laid off this year.

cmonstanley 22-11-2011 21:18

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
up here iast year ;) with police ,passport office,borders agency, coastguards ,council workers etc but good news the home office and tax office are recruiting;)

Margaret Pilkington 23-11-2011 06:57

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Only a link this time not even a word of comment...lazy posting.
Surely you could have put something like 'nasty tories'......you usually do.

garinda 23-11-2011 07:44

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
http://ut0.xhamster.com/u/b/1767771_671353363.gif

jaysay 23-11-2011 08:57

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 950933)
Only a link this time not even a word of comment...lazy posting.
Surely you could have put something like 'nasty tories'......you usually do.

You have to realise Margaret that he has Pole Dance Polly has his preferred bedtime reading

Margaret Pilkington 23-11-2011 10:13

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
I think G has got it right with his post.

jaysay 23-11-2011 10:21

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 950971)
I think G has got it right with his post.

Ya he's never far off the mark is our Rindi:)

cmonstanley 23-11-2011 18:55

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
as the u turns keep coming the song goes they dont know what theyre doing

Margaret Pilkington 23-11-2011 19:02

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Now there is normally a link to some banner sensationalist headline........so where is it?
What U turn?

garinda 23-11-2011 19:16

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 951089)
Now there is normally a link to some banner sensationalist headline........so where is it?
What U turn?

Told you cmoneileen was really a Tory plant, on a mission to bore us all into submisssion.

Forget fake Marxism, he's more an ardent Maggist.

Margaret Thatcher 'the Lady's not for turning' - YouTube

;)

lindsay ormerod 23-11-2011 19:38

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 

And your point is what exactly? If councils can't look after business it gets outsourced. Not rocket science really.

Margaret Pilkington 23-11-2011 19:54

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Hooray for Lindsay.....he might just take notice of you.
He thinks I am a tory supporter, rather than just someone who likes a direct and common sense approach.

cashman 23-11-2011 21:06

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 951104)
And your point is what exactly? If councils can't look after business it gets outsourced. Not rocket science really.

Think the dog incident had a detrimental effect on him Linds,have to make allowances.:D

jaysay 24-11-2011 09:50

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 951104)
And your point is what exactly? If councils can't look after business it gets outsourced. Not rocket science really.

Well your right Lindsay, but C'Mon has no sense anyway and can't really grasp reality

cmonstanley 01-12-2011 17:53

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
what outsourced to reputable companies paying their employees decent wages ,

jaysay 01-12-2011 18:00

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 953292)
what outsourced to reputable companies paying their employees decent wages ,

Have you had a full frontal lobotomy, you talk so much rubbish

cmonstanley 01-12-2011 20:59

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
here david cameron the pension robber ;) Robert Maxwell Daily Mirror advert - YouTube

jaysay 02-12-2011 09:17

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 953373)
here david cameron the pension robber ;) Robert Maxwell Daily Mirror advert - YouTube

Reading Daily Mirror is enough for me

cmonstanley 03-12-2011 02:41

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
i remember in the eighties there was an outcry now its the norm:confused:

jaysay 03-12-2011 08:45

Re: I actually agree with a Tory shock horror!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley (Post 953663)
i remember in the eighties there was an outcry now its the norm:confused:

I remember when they used to teach kids to start a sentence with a capital letter, looks like some fell on stony ground;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com